Sentences with phrase «writing life accounts»

Their self - publishing program Writing Life accounts for 10 percent of units (not dollars) sold worldwide.

Step - by - step: How to self - publish your book using Kobo's direct sales portal Authors can create a Kobo Writing Life account here.

Just create a Kobo Writing Life account, upload your manuscript, and set the price.

Please take the time to do this as it will help us with migrating your existing titles in to your new Kobo Writing Life account (but please note that the process to migrate any pre-existing titles over will take several weeks)

You can create a Kobo Writing Life account as a single - sign on from your existing Kobo reader account at the following address:

Anyone with a Kobo Writing Life account can set up a preorder at Kobo up to 180 days in advance.

Not exact matches

You however don't see your own hypocrisy in greater depth when you say that the bible was deliberately written to be sacred and holy, without ANY sourcing and you take the word of people who lived a really long time ago who also can not provide you with anything more than «eye - witness accounts» which have undoubtedly been changed, tweaked or even just falsly made up in order to cement their point.

«sensible Austin, we don't know what christ did, we just have partial accounts of his life wriiten decades after the supposed facts in a book written by anybody's guess that contains myths and fairytales.

Actually Bishop Samuel WIlberforce, the very existance of the legendary Jesus Christ is also highly suspect, since prior to the writing of the various sections of the Bible long, long after the supposed time of his life, there are no contemporary accounts of him that can be trusted... They're all fabrications and «he said she said's... and the writings of Josephus can't be trusted not to have been changed to include accountings of Jesus long after they were first written...

Austin, we don't know what christ did, we just have partial accounts of his life wriiten decades after the supposed facts in a book written by anybody's guess that contains myths and fairytales.

By first hand account do you mean a live witness or something that Jesus himself wrote?

Um,... actually,... the very existance of the legendary Jesus Christ is highly suspect, since prior to the writing of the various sections of the Bible long, long after the supposed time of his life, there are no contemporary accounts of him that can be trusted... They're all fabrications and «he said she said's... and the writings of Josephus can't be trusted not to have been changed to include accountings of Jesus long after they were first written...

The author may make a nice salary, but unless you can dig up some more detailed account of his life and work, it's hard to say he's uncharitable, or that he shouldn't have written this article.

In my efforts to account for Mantel's animus against God and the Catholic Church, I have indeed written about her personal life.

But while it is hard to imagine theologians writing scientific papers that use the Bible's cosmology or creation account in a literal way, as though Copernicus or Darwin never lived, theologians and clergy abound who accept the Bible's communitarian social framework as normative for political - economic analysis today.

He said nothing of a book that would combine the old covenant scriptures with the account of His life on earth and letters that were written to people who lived under the law, that people who have never lived under the law would have to try to discern and apply to their lives until He returned, or they died.

Maybe it's just because I've lived in the Bible Belt my whole life, but when Smith writes that, among evangelicals, Jesus often gets «sidelined by the interest in defending every proposition and account as inerrant, universally applicable, contemporarily applicable, and so on in ways that try to make the faith «relevant» for everyday concerns,» I totally get it.

Indeed, he writes; «I hope my account of Bonhoeffer makes life difficult for my critics who hold Bonhoeffer in high regard but dismiss me as a «sectarian.»

Sensing an opportunity to be heard by unprejudiced ears, and, writes Las Casas, «knowing the odor of holiness that they produced, he let himself into the straw hut which had been given to the religious for their quarters and made an account of his life.»

In Mantel's case, when she began writing about Cromwell, by her own account she was «filled with glee and a sense of power,» a conviction that everything in her life had prepared her for this.

Ok detective you have the four witnesses and they gave their written statement about Jesus aka Jesus Christ, aka the savior, aka messiah, aka the truth, aka the life, aka the lamb of God, etc et al, and you have pointed out the differences in the accounts.

Writing the Confessions about a decade after the cataclysmic event that altered the rest of his long and productive life, Augustine gave his readers a detailed account of his conversion — an event intimately intertwined with hearing and reading.

This may be a character flaw in someone who writes autobiographies purporting to be true accounts, although even on that score more charitable interpretations are possible (politics of any sort didn't seem to be very important in the life and thinking of Eliade).

There are numerous reasons for why we have four gospel accounts, but one reason is that each Gospel provides a different perspective on the life of Jesus, and is also written with different purposes and motives.

The ordinary pleasures of life — both those simply given to us in nature and those derived from culture — play a large role in Lewis's thinking and account for much of the power of his writing.

As they started approaching the end of their lives, they realized that maybe it was going to take longer than they thought, so they wrote their accounts.

Many accounts of Jesus life were written, the most ancient ones written by eye witnesses (luke is the only one that wasnt written by an eye witness) were canonized.

In order to get the verse right, we must take in account that it was written for people, which want to follow Christ, that means for people, having submitted themselves (all areas of life) to Jesus.

After going into some of the theories of how the evidence about Jesus could have been «tampered» with along the way, he then shows how each theory does not have the evidence to support it, and in the following chapters, goes «link by link» through the chain of custody to show how the Gospel records we have today are an accurate reflection of what was originally written down, and are also an accurate account of what actually happened during the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Even in the second century, a hundred years and more after the time of Jesus, there were doubtless still in circulation oral accounts of incidents in his life and quotations of his teachings which had not until then been committed to writing.

Some Christians, however, have written quite objective accounts of Muhammad's life and teaching.

These letters to dad, written by Sam Riviera, are real - life accounts of real homeless youth he knows.

And in verse 3, we also discover that Luke's purpose in writing was to give an orderly account of the life of Christ.

The Gospel accounts written by unknown authors many decades after the protagonist of their tales supposedly lived incorporate myths from Greek mythology as well as others.

Genesis was written in its current form by Moses likely though about 5 eyewitness accounts ---- So, God created 5 human beings before he created them a world to live in?

Of courses, there's no contemporary accounts of the life of Jesus, just stuff written well after his death, and there's certainly no evidence that he was raised from the dead, but if believing a myth makes you happy, then good for you.

She writes that «while many modernists saw scriptural discrepancies as evidence that the Bible was not «true,» postmodernists would attribute discrepancies to the pluralistic situatedness of interpretation,» making the Bible a more true - to - life and authentic account of human interaction with the divine.

Writing in 1982, after a decade in which the church as a whole had pursued the inner mechanisms of congregations, several sociologists reported as follows: «We share the conviction that in recent years congregational analysis has over-emphasized the internal dynamics of congregational life and has failed to sufficiently account for the influence of the social and ecological context of the church's inner life.

He says that he wrote his Gospel account so that those who read it might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing they might have life in His name.

Judy Barron's chronicle of Sean's life, his autism, and its impact on the entire family is based on journals she kept for years and describes as «a written account of a life we lived but never understood.»

From the sixties of the first century, accounts of Jesus» life began to be written down (Luke 1:1) and presumably the letters of St Paul were collected.

So here at the end of his Gospel account, John explains that he wrote his Gospel so that those who read it might believe that Jesus has the right to rule over all areas of life.

Carl Jung explained why I resist accounting for myself and prefer to take your inventory (from Wikipedia): ~ «Everyone carries a shadow,» Jung wrote, «and the less it is embodied in the individual's conscious life, the blacker and denser it is.»

How about we give some thought to the fact that, despite all of his alleged miracles, no one, not one living soul, thought to commit to writing any accounts of those events during Jesus» lifetime.

I would advise you to get a parallel, or a chronological account written from parallels such as the book «One Perfect Life.»

In the creation story, in the promise to Noah, in Yahweh's pledge to Moses at Sinai, in Jeremiah's prospects for a new covenant written on the heart, and in accounts of the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus, God is always portrayed as promising everlasting loyalty.

Even the accounts of Jesus were not written so that we can follow His example blindly, but so that we can live in our day, and our time, and be Jesus to the people around us, NOT try to be like Jesus as He was 2000 years ago.

It is judged by many scholars to have been written by one who had lived as an eye - witness through that critical period, and who gathered the necessary information together to write this account of that important crisis.

Probably, but the accounts written of Jesus» life, words, deeds, death and alleged ressurection do not prove God exists.

And then there's the individual interpretations of what they think Jesus would DO as if we knew every motivation of a man that may or may not have lived over 2000 years ago of whom we only have these va - gue and ambiguous accounts from other people that were written DECADES after this Jesus guy died.