Sentences with phrase «written arguments posted»

Not exact matches

«I've heard several arguments over the years about how this doesn't really matter, but I believe it does,» writes Rae in his LinkedIn post.

In response to a post by a Twitter user which said Musk should provide «some very strong arguments in a well written blog piece to win over the (myself included) skeptics,» the Tesla and SpaceX CEO wrote: «Movie on the subject coming soon...» Now, why hasn't anyone thought of that before?

Gawker had written an article challenging his argument, similar to an article from The Washington Post and others on the same topic.

Byfield's blog post made a powerful argument for why Bill 24 is necessary to protect LGBTQ students, wrote Postmedia columnist Graham Thomson.

Wong, the former Reddit CEO, summed up the argument for «situational» work flexibility, writing in his Quora post that «remote work and multiple offices work for some people at some companies, some of the time.»

You might want to re-read what Ted M. initially posted, and then your responses... to me at least... what you wrote was not an isomorphic argument that in any way refuted Ted's, and i think - Ace made reference to that as well as - Ted.

In fact, today I had planned to write a post speaking out against tentative plans in the Tennessee legislature to adopt immigration policies similar to those that caused such controversy in Arizona, basing my argument on the inherent worth of our Hispanic neighbors.

His posts are reliably written on a level, both gramatically and in terms of presenting his argument, that should embarrass any fourth grader.

Here's my latest list — this seems like a good spot to set this down, as nobody's posting much on this thread... ---- bad letter combinations / words to avoid if you want to post that wonderful argument: Many, if not most are buried within other words, but I am not shooting for the perfect list, so use your imagination and add any words I have missed as a comment (no one has done this yet)-- I found some but forgot to write them down.

Part of the problem with the way I am writing «Close Your Church for Good» is that these individual blog posts don't carry the full argument and train of thought the way a chapter in a book does.

Since there are many new readers on this blog, and since probably everyone who has been here longer than a year has forgotten the basic argument I am trying to present, I figured I would spend one post summarizing my view and inviting people to go back and read some of what I have written previously only this topic.

Raison's Filter Fiber © (joking about the copyright)-- bad letter combinations / words to avoid if you want to post that wonderful argument: Many, if not most are buried within other words, but I am not shooting for the perfect list, so use your imagination and add any words I have missed as a comment (no one has done this yet)-- I found some but forgot to write them down.

Counsel - When you write something as a post you will find THE PACK ready to pounce and rip apart anyone who writes an article such as yours.Defend Wenger if you must (and god knows he could do with some support from somewhere) but you are a feeding frenzy for THE PACK (which includes me by the way) by writing as you have.Try putting some argument or reasoning to your Post next tpost you will find THE PACK ready to pounce and rip apart anyone who writes an article such as yours.Defend Wenger if you must (and god knows he could do with some support from somewhere) but you are a feeding frenzy for THE PACK (which includes me by the way) by writing as you have.Try putting some argument or reasoning to your Post next tPost next time.

I responded to numerous comments on here that call into question the logic of my argument and even wrote follow - up posts that are linked from the end of the post.

,» In the piece, Dana comes out essentially right where I did, suggesting that we modify flavored milk rather than eliminating it entirely, and she backs up her arguments with many more facts and figures than I had at hand when I wrote my own post.

«This prosecution is a theory in search of a crime,» defense attorneys wrote at the opening of written arguments aimed at wiping out charges that led Democrat Sheldon Silver to step down from his leadership post.

Samuel Russell writes: «Putland's analysis in that blog post relies on the US constitution to make an argument in relation to Australia...»

I found this a useful and timely post and have used it today to respond to a man writing to me with the argument that CO2 is not a pollutant but a fertilizer.

This post is the Basic version (written by Anne - Marie Blackburn) of the skeptic argument «It warmed before 1940».

This post is the Advanced version (written by dana1981) of the skeptic argument «It's the sun».

This post is the Advanced version (written by dana1981) of the skeptic argument «Climate sensitivity is low».

Mitch Daniels Says Anti-GMO is Immoral, Perhaps the GMO Industry is Immoral by Jeffrey Dach MD Mitch Daniels, ex-governor of Indiana and President of Purdue University recently wrote a Pro-GMO editorial for the Washington Post declaring Anti-GMO arguments are «immoral»... Continue reading →

Honestly i still do nt understand what made you write this post with non sense arguments that make no sense

There was an interesting post on Bloomberg regarding asset class correlations, and a lot of blogs wrote about it, including Abnormal Returns, which did a nice summary, and expanded the argument to...

I wrote a post a few months back showing why I think that a segment of British Airways flyers should actually be crediting their flight to AAdvantage and the main argument behind that post was that you need a lot fewer AAdvantage miles to fly in comfort around the world than you do Avios.

Well, let's say, for the argument's sake, that I can't write blog posts that would last forever.

Now I'm not highlighting this poster's comments to shame him, but rather the opposite; I believe that his posts are useful as a well written example of the types of arguments pay - to - win apologists usually put forward.

Someone writes a guest post on RC and then for eternity it's a done deal and assumed «true» when it was little more than egregious incompetent SPIN more worthy of a biased politician than a couple of biased scientists obviously incapable of thinking holistically and unable to stop creating fraudulent Strawmen arguments out of thin air trying to prove they are «right» and the other is «wrong».

I've also written a book on the subject (self - published) and have posted portions of the argument in a range of other places.

But, as I wrote in a comment on that post, «It's important not to conclude that moral arguments for action on global warming, even conveyed by a pope, are a world - changing breakthrough.

This post was written by Dana Nuccitelli (dana1981) has been incorporated into the Intermediate version of the skeptic argument «CO2 limits will harm the economy».

John Nielse - Gammon seems to have written a full post on arguments discussed by many (including myself) on this site in a shorter form.

An American meteorologist writes in the Washington Post to rebut 10 of the most popular arguments in favour of man - made global warming.

NOTE: This post is the Advanced version (written by dana1981) of the skeptic argument «It's not us».

When Rose has written misleading articles in the past I have responded by writing detailed blog posts criticising his arguments, by writing to the Mail (they did publish my letter) and writing to the mail's ombudsman (no response).

Paul, I enjoy reading your writing; you post with eloquence and offer cogent and thoughtful argument.

This post is the Advanced version (written by dana1981) of the skeptic argument «Hansen's 1988 prediction was wrong».

This blog post is the Basic version (written by Graham Wayne) of the skeptic argument «Global warming is good».

This post is the Basic version (written by Graham Wayne) of the skeptic argument «Hurricanes aren't linked to global warming».

This post is the Intermediate version (written by Dana Nuccitelli [dana1981]-RRB- of the skeptic argument «CO2 only causes 35 % of global warming».

This post is the Basic version (written by Graham Wayne) of the skeptic argument «Does ocean cooling prove global warming has ended?».

I have written two previous posts that address the idea that uncertainty increases the argument for action

Or, if you'd rather, write it up in WUWT style and email it to me [email protected] and, if I agree with the argument and so on, I'll help with the formatting and post it (if Anthony and you agree) under my Guest Contributor authorship with you credited as Co-Author.

It's a truism that whenever I write about the solid fact that the Earth is warming up, that post will get comments that make it clear that denialists — and please read that link before commenting on my use of the word — are like religious zealots, writing the same tired long - debunked arguments that are usually debunked in the very post they're commenting on.

Silverglate points to Scott Horton's post last week for Harper's Magazine, in which he makes a similar argument, specifically directed to John Yoo and Steven Bradbury, the Office of Legal Counsel staffers who wrote the torture memos.

A written transcript will be available within about an hour after the argument concludes, and will be posted on this blog as soon as it is available.

In contrast to my market - related argument from last November, I write this post to make the simple point that the discovery - related amendments to the Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure are a practice - related reason to engage in systematic discovery planning and management.

Our earlier post (and see update) mentioned that Eugene Volokh had written about the contours of a constitutional right to self - defense, and now the UCLA lawprof (at the newly un-paywalled site of his Conspiracy) has sketched a possible argument against the Philly Plexiglass measure along those lines.

In contrast to my market - related argument from last November, I write this post to make the simple point that the discovery - related amendments to the Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure are a practice - related reason to engage in... [more]

Last week, I posted an extract from an interview with Chief Justice John Roberts on preparation for oral argument found in the 2010 edition of the Scribes Journal of Legal Writing.