Sentences with phrase «written back claims»

Pending are yet to be settled and Written back claims are «sent back for more information.)

Pending are yet to be settled and Written back claims are «sent back for more information)

Not exact matches

A few weeks back I wrote about skin - cream marketer Beiersdorf, which was sanctioned by consumer protection authorities in the U.S. and Canada because it claimed one of its Nivea - brand skin cream products helped users slim down.

While it's true that you can claim a tax write - off, you're not getting 100 % of your money back, and you must wait for months to get a portion of your money back after your purchase.

This is too long, but I want to end with something I wrote about Moltmann's theology a while back, which is very relevant for at least 2 of the players here, who have published claiming his works as defining for them.

Occasionally I'm annoyed by a fly buzzing slowly past me (and I'm reminded of a line from a hymn my grandfather claimed to have sung: «There may be flies on you and me, but there ain't no flies on Jesus») Once in a while I feel twinges of boredom as the sermon wears on, or pangs of regret as my mind wanders back to the letters I meant to write the past week.

A few thousand years ago, unnamed desert dwelling goat herders wrote a book, making all sorts of outrageous and outlandish claims, backed up by zero evidence, and they have hundreds of millions of followers.

Last century, L Ron Hubbard wrote a book, as foolish as it is, making all sorts of outrageous and outlandish claims, backed up by zero evidence, and he has millions of followers.

200 years ago, Joseph Smith wrote a book, as foolish as it is, making all sorts of outrageous and outlandish claims, backed up by zero evidence, and he has tens of millions of followers.

So we fight back with logic and ask them to prove their beliefs with something substantiative that can be tested without a doubt and not some ancient texts written by MEN (no matter how many times they claim it's «HIS» word).

Sure, David goes on to say that he was uneasy with such a claim and wasn't even sure that it was true, but still... how do you write a book which is supposed to be about taking back your faith from the American Dream and start the book by stating that you are the youngest megachurch pastor in American history?

We do not get to claim non-religiosity simply to fit in, or to feel better about ourselves,» wrote Laura Turner back in 2012, in response to «Why I Hate Religion, But Love Jesus.»

Just looking back at what Atheist Hunter wrote I find an enormous amount of contradiction and outrageous claims.

If credence is given to the claim that the Katthavattu or fifth book was actually written in connection with the Third Council, then the scholastic development of Buddhism must go well back into early Buddhist times, because this book makes reference to at least two other parts of the pitaka.

He has written several books and claims that his theories have scientific backing.

I can only hope that this attempt is taken more seriously than the largely muted and clearly unsuccessful protests of late last season... although the plane writing escapade brought some much - needed attention to the matter, it failed to resonate with fence - sitters and those who had just recently fell off the Wenger truck... without a big enough showing of support the whole endeavor appeared relatively weak and poorly organized, especially to the major media outlets, whose involvement could have significantly changed what was to follow... but I get it, few wanted to turn on their club, let alone make a public display of their discord... problem is, they are preying on that vulnerability, in fact, their counting on you to keep your thoughts to yourself... who are you to tell these fat cats how to steal your money... they have worked long and hard to pull the wool over your eyes... they even went so far as to pay enormous sums of cash to your once beloved professor to be their corporate spokesmodel so that the whole thing would be more palatable... eventually the club made it appear as if this was simply a relatively small fringe group of highly radicalized supporters, which allowed the pro-Wenger element inside the club hierarchy to claim victory following the FA Cup win... unfortunately what has happened to this club can't be solved by FA Cups or a few players coming in, the very culture of this club needs to be changed and that starts at the top... in order to change the unhealthy and dysfunctional narrative that has absorbed this club we need to remove everyone who presently occupies a position of power... only then can we get back to the business of playing championship caliber football, which should always be the number one priority of this organization... on an important side note, one of the most devastating mistakes made in the final days of this hectic and poorly planned transfer window didn't have to do with the big name players like Sanchez or Lemar, but the fact that they failed to secure Jadon Sancho, who might even start for Dortmund this season... I think they might seriously regret this oversight... instead of spending so much time, energy and manpower pretending that they were desperately trying to make big moves, they once again lost the plot due to their all too familiar tunnel vision

At the time of writing Aguero can be backed at 11/1 with Sportsbet to finish as the league's top scorer, and it would be wise to bet now to claim such generous odds.

He had «gone into cardiac arrest caused by dehydration,» she wrote, a claim backed up by Los Angeles County medical examiner's records.

My old NET colleague John Anthony (who's soon off to a new gig at the U.N. Foundation) writes in today to note an online aspect to the current Democratic «scandal» — to back up her claim that Barack Obama plagiarized Massachusetts governor Deval Patrick, Hillary Clinton's campaign has emailed political reporters a link to a YouTube video that shows speeches by the two side - by - side:

Why not write back politely to the same list with a link to a credible article debunking the claim?

My old NET colleague John Anthony (who's soon off to a new gig at the U.N. Foundation) writes in today to note an online aspect to the current Democratic «scandal» — to back up her claim that Barack Obama plagiarized Massachusetts governor Deval Patrick, Hillary...

Republican Sen. Bill Larkin's campaign has written to cable providers and a national ad buying firm calling on them to yank ads by a super PAC backed by the New York State United Teachers union which claim he received a 47 percent pay increase.

While the group backed by Cuomo's allies claims that they're the only one for which two of four statewide candidates — the governor and Lt. Gov. Kathy Hochul — endorsed the rules, Caruso wrote it would be an «unfortunate precedent» for the court to assume other candidates, Attorney General Eric Schneiderman and Comptroller Tom DiNapoli, were undecided about adopting that set.

In the strongly worded letter dated 16 May from seven Center department heads and senior scientist Harvey Alter, they wrote that the claim that patient safety took a back seat to research is «quite simply, incorrect.»

Three things happened to the TEKS and all - science education standard that called for teaching the strength and weaknesses of theories, which had, back in the last time biology text books were adopted in the mid»90s, had been used as a club to beat publishers over whether or not they included weaknesses of evolution; by which they may enlist creationists and their claims, was taken out by the writing committees and attempted to be put back on several occasions actually by the school board members.

John Fitzpatrick of Cornell University and the other scientists who originally wrote about the ivory - billed sighting shot back with a their own technical paper, claiming that, among other things, Sibley used inaccurate models of takeoff and flight behavior to interpret the video.

He has written several books and claims that his theories have scientific backing.

, Interestingly Ms. Minger references, more than once, the work of Chris Masterjohn in backing up some of her claims against the findings in «The China Study», the same Chris Masterjohn who at the time of writing did not have any qualifications or credentials in the areas of health, nutrition and biochemistry, much like Ms. Minger, but who does have the credentials to write a foreword in MS. WInger's first book «Death by Food Pyramid».

Dr Perlmutter IS right and years of science and research back up his claims along with true testimonials from real people - have you even read the book??? like I said before people like you who are not willing to give up gluten carbs and sugars are going to be the first ones to come on here with skepticism and claims that this is just another «fad diet - «newsflash Will this is a lifestyle and the followers are not in a cult they are real people who want to take charge of their health and live to see their great grandchildren and still be sound in their minds its fine to have questions but to come on here and insult this fine doctor who has helped so many people throughout his career and has written a New York times best seller to educate and help so many more people just makes you sound absurd and immature - he is speaking the truth everything we've been told about nutrition is a lie to profit the wheat industry, doctors and pharmaceutical companies because as long as people keep eating the wrong foods and getting sicker and fatter they will all profit.

The second dimension they looked at was «warranting» — basically, backing up any written claims by including some kind of evidence, such as detailed personal information that could be verified online, or links to a third - party professional site that could verify their biography.

This year Wimmer is back with Ultraviolet, an Aeon Flux - like sci - fi movie he claims to have written specifically with lead actress Milla Jovovich of Fifth Element and Resident Evil fame in mind.

It's predecessor missed out on a spot in our top ten back in 2011, but 20th Century Fox's simian sequel Dawn of the Planet of the Apes had enough love among our writing team to claim eighth place this time around.

Someone claiming to be his assistant emailed back, Todd said, «in the same broken English Tommy wrote in.»

«The first great film of 2015,» we wrote in our review of «Ex Machina» back in January, when the film opened in the U.K. and that's a risky claim.

Arsen, who wrote a review of the literature on the competitive effects of choice back in 2012, warned against making «broad, generic claims about the competitive effect.»

Our writing service also guarantees the money back, and we are proud to claim, that throughout the whole history of our team we have never been asked for this option.

I didn't want to write memoir or non-fiction: I wanted to go back to the freedom of fiction, where you can claim ownership of the material, and handle it in any way that enables you to create a larger, deeper truth.

Unfortunately, many companies in the essay writing industry have no valid proofs to back up their claims of professionalism.

However, we have been working and writing drugs and alcohol essays for ages, and no one has claimed for returning money back because of full satisfaction after making use of our custom writing site.

These claims fall under the category of claims repudiated or pending or written back.

If your card company says your case is on hold, write back to clarify that your claim is in relation to credit cards and that you will be continuing with your complaint.

One can sympathize with Mr. Marr's intention to provide a counterpoint to the constant rah - rahs from the real estate industry (As a matter of fact, many years back, I wrote a very similar post in response to industry claims that real estate beat stocks here).

«We still are failing to see the changes required to back [these claims] up,» wrote Grant.

Ahh one of the minions of the forces of confusion have dropped by to say that I'm not allowed to say «The warming has stopped since 2001» even though it was accurate when I wrote it, backed by research, that I didn't claim it proved AGW was wrong or that the world would not get warmer at some later date (but does show the models were wrong and other forces are at work).

An outstanding example of someone getting it totally wrong is the case of a prominent economist who wrote a submission to a parliamentary committee claiming that it would take more than 3000 years for a wind farm to «pay back» the carbon dioxide emissions resulting from the manufacturing of the concrete used in the turbine's footings.

«Nullius in Verba» writes in to contest the article's claim that «This pattern of a warming surface and a cooling upper atmosphere is due to an enhanced greenhouse effect: since more heat is trapped near the surface, less is radiated back up through the stratosphere.»

Turns out that Tierney's reference fails to back up his claim on this issue, although it could just be a matter of poor writing by Tierney.

As written, I do not think the consensus can back away from paleo - work and maintain their claim of confidence.

Recently, Steven Goddard writing for The Register backed off his earlier claim that the Arctic ice data from the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) were erroneous and that there was no massive loss of ice.

Well, it looks like the press release was carefully worded, and referring back to Anthony Watts article on his blog which is criticized at the beginning of the RC article, i see no wrong claim there... Hiss main argument is written in bold: «The IPCC is under scrutiny for various data inaccuracies, including its claim — based on a flawed World Wildlife Fund study — that up to 40 % of the Amazonian forests could react drastically and be replaced by savannas from even a slight reduction in rainfall.»