Sentences with phrase «wrong ideas in»

Dr. Rick Albrecht, author of Coaching Myths: Fifteen Wrong Ideas in Youth Sports, will lead the session, Sports Specialization: Training One - Trick Ponies.
The development company may have executed the wrong idea in the right location.

Not exact matches

An example of what can go wrong when tech business builders put their ideas into motion without having coding knowledge is the experience of former NFL cornerback Phillip Buchanon, who was drafted 17th overall in the 2002 draft and played for the Houston Texans, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Detroit Lions and Washington Redskins.
In the Lean Startup model what we're trying to show is that something can be wrong with your idea but that doesn't mean your company has to fail.
I was totally wrong for an operations position; I'd always be coming up with new ideas, driving everyone else crazy in the process.
There are times when an idea is ripe but the market is wrong — a situation many entrepreneurs find themselves in right now.
And then, in what was either a clever tactical play, or a spineless submission, the Gap announced it would revert to its old logo, and admitted crowd - sourcing was the wrong idea.
It gives you the option to look at things in a «just the facts» manner (white hat); where things could go wrong (black hat); and possibilities, alternatives, and new ideas (green hat), for example.
«But he's wrong in that, if it's a good idea, there are going to be other people doing it.
We are all counting on future users to Google our company name and reach our desired pages — but choosing the wrong name will result in a life of horror, pain and blood (okay, maybe the results will be a little less dramatic, but you get the idea).
Denmark's flexicurity is also another one of those pragmatically human ideas that makes one wonder whether we're coming at things all wrong here in North America.
«They're full of ideas and ready to make a new plan for their businesses, especially when they have an understanding of where things are going wrong in the first place.»
However, in this video, Entrepreneur Network partner Ben Angel wants to give viewers some out - of - the - box ideas about what might be wrong and how they can fix it going forward.
It Starts with a Buzz The University of Life Service, Service, Service What Business Should You Be In When is the right time to Start a business Don't Be a Flake Get It Right from the Start - Build Your Business like an Egyptian Pyramid My First Business Venture How I Started My Business Where It Went Wrong Making a Mistake Don't Burn Your Bridges Damage Limitation and Control How I Moved On Controlling Your Financial Exposure Getting Help with Your Idea How do You Research Your Idea Why You Have a Business Always Be Prepared Vertical or Horizontal Vision What Direction to Follow Leadership and Employing Staff Guiding Your Management Team Enjoy Your Work and Your Life Get Your Products and Services Right Low Cost Products and Service is not the Way Ahead Do You Need a Business Partner Business Expansion If You Want to Diversify, of What Should You Be Aware More Examples of Business Expansion The Importance of Good Time Keeping Time Management Real Estate Investment Finding the Solution
«The idea that everybody needs to be terrified of Amazon is completely wrong,» says Brian Spaly, who cofounded two e-commerce-centric startups, Bonobos (menswear) and Trunk Club (a wardrobe - in - a-box service), which sold to Walmart and Nordstrom, respectively, for nine - figure sums.
With the software laid down, it's also a safe bet there will be advances on the idea that blockchains can and should connect in order to assuage businesses wary of investing in the wrong tech, or being worried about getting boxed out of future business opportunities.
These people know the basics and at the same time they make very basic mistakes like pick wrong keywords, have no idea of landing page is, get involved with companies that offer Google ranking in 24 hours, etc..
Instead, they would have bought because they like the idea of BitGold, oblivious to the fact that a good business can be a bad investment at the wrong price, or because they think that someone else will be dumb enough to pay an even higher price in the future.
Those who have the wrong ideas about momentum and trend following and who ignore it true potential are missing out on opportunities that one could only imagine in days past.
Additionally, investing legend Howard Marks published a widely - read memo on Wednesday that warned on a variety of market conditions right now, including positioning around the FAANG stocks and a lack of ideas about what could go wrong in markets.
Nye's premises is all wrong about children believing in creation are behind in the world of Science, thus the idea should be abolished.
wow you have no idea what you're talking about... everything you said is wrong in this statement... i am now dumber for having read it
Ya, all the ideas are wrong, what mister «pastor» says is right... The answer is in the bible, but he never quotes texts explaining why suffering.
They also fear it as, in the back of their mind, there is always this tiny idea scratching at their mind saying «What if you're wrong???».
Second there are plenty of people who come to their faith as it were through something more than bible verses its called critical thinking people can critically think their way to the idea that they are rather small beings in a relatively huge universe and that they realize that they can't know everything and leave some things including the nature of the universe to faith and acknowledge it as faith if that's how they see the world fine is there anything particularly wrong with that?
To make gains among these voters, Republicans needed to make detailed (but pithy) arguments about what was wrong with Obamacare and the benefits of Republican health care policy X (read National Affairs to get an idea of some of the things they could have said), and do so in plain language.
The idea that a huge portion of the world that believes in things that can not be proven nor seen nor understood by reason, is affecting the life and death of the rest of the world that doesn't find those things based in truth or reality... IS WRONG, AND IS RUINING LIVES AND DESTROYING OUR PLANET...
I cintend that the bible also calls us to do the same thing — it calls us to action and then says when we have donr everything we can and there is nothing else we are to stand in faith that it will work out — of course i paraphrase — but wht do people think all christians do is sit on their butts and pray and look pie eyed at the sky - this christian worked her butt of on the streets - and look at Mother Thresa - and other christians working for humanity all over the world - i think athiests have the wrong idea about chtistians...
Therefore, a believer in unicorns could easily say to me, no matter how absurd the idea, «unicorns are real, prove me wrong, scientific evidence only please».
In other words, David is not receptive to new ideas, and if they counter his own, they are wrong, and not worth discussing.
To attack a proposal as supposedly being wrong simply because it is spoken by Someone the Speaker does not like is argumentum ad hominem, is logically invalid, and strongly suggests said Speaker has no real way discrediting the * ideas * put forth in said proposal.
It's ok to not buy into the Christian ideas of god and what not, but to spread lies in order to further justify your lack of belief / hatred is just wrong.
someone who is locked in to the wrong idea.
In this way, the genuine but gentle consideration of other ideas either shows us where we were wrong, or reinforce what we already believe.
In other words, its basically giving the young African Americans the wrong idea about what they (NAACP) are truly here to do.
I repeat: I hope I am wrong; but I am, all the same, beginning to wonder if the warm support with which even quite unexpected people in our hierarchy (like Bishop Hollis) greeted the establishment of the Ordinariate this time round (you will remember the hostility with which they squashed a similar but less radical basic idea in the Nineties) was really as wholehearted as it seemed at the time: or were they simply saying what they knew the Pope wanted them to say, but without any real belief in the idea itself?
I think most people who believe in prayer don't have insidious reasons for it... I am open to the idea that I am wrong, but the paranoia of many on this blog is disturbing.
I find that people who are fiercest in their defense of «church» are often those who simply can not handle the idea that (1) their church can do any wrong, and (2) they themselves were wrong in their belief that the church can do no wrong.
If a group like this fails in their predictions, they are then forced to adapt to their wrong ideas and try to find a new meaning in which they are forced to deal with a reality they can not change.
And the idea that, as a wife, I would need to «become passive» or smaller or somehow less in order to make my marriage work is damaging and wrong.
Oh, the Calvinists could make perfect sense of it all with a wave of a hand and a swift, confident explanation about how Zarmina had been born in sin and likely predestined to spend eternity in hell to the glory of an angry God (they called her a «vessel of destruction»); about how I should just be thankful to be spared the same fate since it's what I deserve anyway; about how the Asian tsunami was just another one of God's temper tantrums sent to remind us all of His rage at our sin; about how I need not worry because «there is not one maverick molecule in the universe» so every hurricane, every earthquake, every war, every execution, every transaction in the slave trade, every rape of a child is part of God's sovereign plan, even God's idea; about how my objections to this paradigm represented unrepentant pride and a capitulation to humanism that placed too much inherent value on my fellow human beings; about how my intuitive sense of love and morality and right and wrong is so corrupted by my sin nature I can not trust it.
Firstly, it must be remembered, that he disclaims very early in the book that he can only speak for the mainline denominations with which he is familiar, and although my memory may fail me, he implies that he can only speak for his observations of the churches / leaders with whom he is familiar, and also that he may be wrong, and also, that he is only pointing out what he calls a possible cause for the problems he has seen, and hopes that his suggestions / ideas, will be considered, researched, etc, and that time will tell if his thesis bears any truth or not.
If, nevertheless, historically endless disputes and radical disagreements over the interpretation of the doctrine have in fact arisen, this is one piece of evidence that there is probably something wrong, perhaps self - contradictory, in the basic idea.
Buddhists, for millennia, have rejected some of the ideas that Whitehead found wrong in modern Western thought.
I can see how one can look at this idea and look at the following examples in Hebrews 11 as «Because they were sure they would get this reward, they did this thing» but as the author points out in verse 39 that they didn't get what they imagined they would, so if we understand faith as «being sure» it would turn out that it is «being sure» of something and being totally wrong — instead it makes more sense to understand Hebrews 11:1 as saying that «faith is a realization (or actualization)» of our hopes, a realization that the author points out is greater than we could expect and be sure in.
It is an idea absolutely impossible to express in any word: «reign» or «kingship» would be too abstract and «theocracy» puts the emphasis in the wrong place.
Kuhns delineates five areas in Bonhoeffer's thought that hold particular fascination for Roman Catholics: (1) «his idea of community» (the church is the community where Christ is); (2) «his search for the true nature of the Church's authority» (in the concrete situations facing the church who can speak with authority about wrong or right?)
For in the Old Covenant such as it appeared in history there was much that was right and willed by God, but there were also a great many errors, wrong developments and depraved ideas, while there was no permanent infallible authority to separate the two.
I guess that if your ego doesn't allow you to entertain the idea that you might just be wrong in this then you can die without any such worries of who you may have hurt along the way, but some of us aren't willing to step over people just to get ahead.
That fellow voted for the wrong guy in the last election, he cheats on his wife, is dishonest in business, drinks like a fish, doesn't go to church, has crazy religious ideas, and his neighbor tells me he may be gay!
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z