Sentences with phrase «wrong number say»

Not exact matches

Trump's legal team was initially looking at a number of options to avoid having the president submit to a face - to - face sit down with the special counsel, including providing written responses to questions and submitting an affidavit saying Trump did nothing wrong.

«I didn't want to do just the traditional «This is the wrong number» and be rude about it that way, so I assumed if I just responded with anything, that would pretty much clarify to them that they shouldn't have included me on this,» he said.

The Community Bankers Association (CBA) says they want to be let off the hook if a robocall is made to the wrong cellphone number by mistake.

(Neither league has confirmed those numbers; Bettman said at the news conference that early reports «on the economics of this deal» were wrong.)

«The reason the Republican party essentially forgot to celebrate America this year might have been because they were too busy celebrating Donald Trump's claims that he would fix whatever Donald Trump thinks is wrong with America,» Oliver said before launching into a takedown of the «countless awful things» Trump has said over the past year, stirring up any number of controversies throughout his campaign for the White House.

(The number of complaints filed increased sharply when the NLRB said in October that American Medical Response of Connecticut was wrong to fire an employee for criticizing her boss on Facebook.)

«The fact that he can register what looks like a massive drop and still collect a massive number shows there was something wrong with the original plan,» says Stefan Stern, director of the High Pay Centre, a U.K. think tank focused on pay.

However, let's say I am wrong and there are like 10 countries that aprrove of the practice... that number is 5 %.

Society says a number of things are wrong.

Over fifty years ago, G. Ernest Wright in The Biblical Archaeology (1955, p 46) said: «It may be noted that the new Carbon 14 method of dating ancient remains has not turned out to be as free from error as had been hoped... Certain runs have produced obviously wrong results, probably for a number od reasons.

Of course you can be proven wrong... your holy book was written by man, no god involved; thus your belief is based on the fairy tales told by men who saw a gullible fool a mile away - see, how easy that is??? As for the actual number being only 1.6 billion, sorry the stats say different and your opinion on who the actual number includes is moot.

You are saying that because of your flawed calculation we should see fossil evidence of an astronomical number of species — you are simply wrong.

ddeevviinn I know of a number of people who say that they can find no sensible reason for denying equal marriage rights to gays, but they will because the Bible declares it wrong.

The number of these involuntary exiles was not large — about forty - six hundred according to Jeremiah 52:28 - 30; but since this is probably the number of adult males, we would not be far wrong in assuming a grand total of, say, fifteen to twenty thousand.

«That said, if the churches do not take the opportunity now to «advocate» and «teach» why same - sex marriage is wrong for everyone (i.e., harmful to children, to the couple, and undermining of a culture of marriage), religious people should not expect to find a lot of sympathy for their right to exercise their religious freedom to dissent from same - sex marriage,» Esbeck told CT. «In other words, church leaders no longer enjoy the luxury of not teaching biblical marriage, as much as large numbers of the laity don't want to hear it.

Where there is knowledge there's also faith, and Peirce also says in a number of places that extreme pessimism is wrong in principle.

That's why the 2nd verse says that he is a root out of dry ground, he has to convert to righteousness, he didn't know who he was at first until he grew to know, and is why it says in verse 12, he was numbered with the transgressors, he «bare» did wrong too, the sins of many, but made intercessor, (turned his life around) praying, working for the transgressors for YHWH telling them to convert, pouring out his soul.

Her education or lack thereof, the additional number of children, where she lives, etc. have absolutely NOTHING to do with the fact that the judge was so obviously wrong, in appropriate, disrespectful and did I say WRONG, spewing the same ignorance as the jwrong, in appropriate, disrespectful and did I say WRONG, spewing the same ignorance as the jWRONG, spewing the same ignorance as the judge.

After saying Australia needs to cut immigration numbers, former PM Tony Abbott has been criticised by government ministers, who say he's just wrong.

v are not saying sanchez and ozil didn't play bad in the matches but most of the time u can c the chances they created went invain ozil created highest number of chances in epl history still only 18 went in the net doesn't it show the potential of the guy alexis rant his heart out in matches but he was moved to wrong position by manager his form dropped..

«The decisions that are being made right now are whether a sport makes money for the university, or whether it in some ways gets the numbers wrong with Title IX,» he says.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

this window has just finished i am already thinking about who we will get for the january window we might try for khedira on a really low offer as he is free agent almost would help boost numbers in midfield in the new year as we will no doubt need to filling the numbers about then also i will hold my hands up and say i was wrong this morning for giving wenger stick and saying welbeck is rubbish i have been out in the cold light of day and had a chance to reevaluate the situation and realized that this could be a canny shrew transfer on wenger behalf actually if wenger can turn the clock back and work his magic on welbeck and get him scoring goals and improve his game then we could have a great underrated signing on our hands its wengers absolute trust in him that might be what makes him a great player as this is something that he never had at old mordor if anybody can make him a world beater wenger can he loves this little pet projects improving players against the odds welbeck has the skillset to be high class player upfornt he just needs to work very hard on his finishing i think once he gets a few goals under his belt he will settle in fine and he is a team player you could put him on the left against man city to shore up that side and he will put in a great shift without a complaint that could be his biggest asset to us or on the right whenever we need him there ithinkwenger might start himon the left against city to protect the left back against navas and i bet you if he does a great job we will take a shine to him quickly i am hopeing he will be one of those wenger gems that he finds and polishes up to a high finish i must admit i was annoyed as some other gunners were at not signing d / m and c / h but if wenger does win the league with this lot it will be his greatest win yet and what might play in to our hands is the unpredictable nature of the league in the last few seasons if we get on a good run at the right time we might be hard to stop look at city they should have never lost to stoke but the result is there in black and white for all to see and i think chelsea will hit the skids after a while to just because cesc and costa are doing well now thats there main threat but teams will work out how to stop them as the season goes on and chelsea will become predictable i think we might just do well this season after all

you're isolating yourselves because you want to resort only to numbers in a sport where there are variables you can't quantify, so to sit here and say the eye test group is wrong is bs because no matter what numbers you throw at me you'll never be able to prove it.

(Maybe seethed is the wrong word, but in a television interview last week Sorenstam said, «I've been Number 1, and I know how it feels.

Putting aside my intense hatred for terry aside on a number of factors, You're wrong on this one my friend... Terry was by far the best defender in the league, its not just me saying it, he stats prove it he was unanimously voted by the rest of the players in the league into the pfa team of the year... Don't let your love of Arsenal cloud the obvious were talking of a man who has had more world team of the year and uefa team of the year appearance's, that Per can only dream of having... Having rose tinted glasses on would have you thinking Giroud was the worlds bes striker and theo walcott is on an equal ability to Cristiano Ronaldo.

Your not wrong, I remember a good number of years back we would give our say on Stokes footballing abilities leading up to a game and I remember thinking that they will use those headlines hanging on locker room wall against us and then we would get bulldozed during the game.

Personally, I don't find anything wrong with assigning odds to which paw my dog will lift first, or coming up with an over / under on the number of times my mom will say «Has anyone seen my phone?»

Someone else gives you what is said to be his home number — and the warning, «You didn't get it from me» — but when you call and ask for Bob Gibson, you're told, «You got the wrong number.»

A number 2 needs to say to AW this shit is wrong and not sit on the bench with his head in his hands.

It's a bit of an understatement to say that Van Gaal has got a lot of things wrong in his time at United, but whether the number of academy debutants has come about by accident or design, youth development is certainly not one of them.

I don't think I've said anything about it yet — and I can't remember you saying anything about it either, (I apologise if I'm wrong, but I'm a pretty fervent reader) but what about Walcott in number 14??

While he was praised highly for some of his shrewd purchases of players, it isn't until you really delve through the Villa ranks and discover who is no longer involved in first - team affairs that you unravel where the whole Randy Lerner (Aston Villa owner) Martin O'Neill relationship really went wrong, with the club's acquisitions of several talented individuals not enough to overshadow the large number of flops which entered Villa Park via O'Neill's say - so, nor did it help balance the books.

Sadly, she is wrong in believing that «being a good wife shouldn't be any different than being a good husband»; an overwhelming number of never - married women want a husband who has a steady job (while men say they favor someone who shares their ideas about raising children) and that male - as - provider model most likely perpetuates gendered expectations when it comes to marriage.

Don't get me wrong, there are some things on this list I definitely agree with, but when it starts out with number one saying it's a mistake to share a bed with your baby, you can bet that I'm going to take the whole list with a grain of salt.

I understand Tuteor implied this here by 1) saying that the study was wrong to count when who survived morbidity instead of women who experienced morbidity and 2) making a graph with the number of dead women being comparable to the number of sick women....

All that being said, I am still responsible for a number of egregious environmental wrongs.

Since writing about this subject three years ago I can not count the number of messages I have received that said, «My pedi said there was nothing wrong so we suffered for months, then we got a second opinion and discovered a severe tie!»

«I think it's quite wrong to make the assumption that simply because the number of police officers is falling that means there will be a worse frontline service,» Mr Herbert said.

«New York's number one in all the wrong things under this governor and we're paying a price for it,» Astorino said.

Silver's attorney suggested that Taub's referrals — which were to a number of firms in addition to Weitz — were done in the most altruistic manner, and noted that he'd fought to retain his tenured position at Columbia despite being removed in the wake of Silver's arrest, because — as he said in his suit against the university that brought a temporary injunction against the school — he believed he had done nothing wrong.

I accept what the Home Secretary said, that apparently it's only going to apply to a limited number of people, but the fact that it applies to a limited number of people doesn't make it any less wrong.

She said: «Is he also concerned that given the number of Home Office decisions that were got wrong on these Windrush cases about a wider culture of disbelief, about whether a net migration target is distorting decisions and also about the lack of checks and balances in the system to prevent injustices?»

The numbers for Monroe County were 48 percent who said it's going in the right direction, 42 percent saying it's on the wrong track; for Rochester, 47 percent said it's on the wrong track and 39 percent say it's going in the right direction.

Schimminger said at an economic development hearing in Albany that Empire State Development reported «wrong numbers from the companies» in Start - Up NY.

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio blamed his tanking poll numbers on «negative headlines» and said the public will welcome him back with open arms once the law enforcement probes wind down — and show he did nothing wrong.

Tony Blair's spokesman said that any suggestion Number Ten had released the email was «just plain wrong».

John Schoonmaker said there are a number of reasons why approving the pipeline would be the wrong choice.

«They are wrong on the numbers, wrong on the facts and their mind - numbingly dumb personal attacks would be insulting if they even had an ounce of accuracy,» Dani Lever, a spokeswoman for Cuomo, said in an emailed statement.

The number of people who secretly agree with him but would never dream of saying so is a small part of everything that is wrong with politics.