Sentences with phrase «wrong book for»

Wrong book for that.

If you were looking for «War and Peace» this is the wrong book for you.

If you think that birth control doesn't provide a benefit, such as alleviation of menstrual migraines, endometriosis, PMDD, and prevention of menorrhagia, then your nose has been buried in the wrong book for far too long.

Not exact matches

There is only a wrong or bad book for certain goals.

«If they were buying it for the real estate investment, they made the wrong decision,» says Kelly, who notes that Intrawest's remaining developable property in Whistler had a modest book value of between $ 75 million and $ 100 million.

Poundstone's book argues that this answer, however intuitive, is wrong (for the right answer, click here).

With the ability to transfer points to travel partners, book directly through the Chase portal, or redeem for cash or gift cards, you can't really go wrong.

The real problem is how people live them in a wrong way and we instead of learning the religion from their holy books try to understand from the people who claim they are doing it for one religion.

Published a decade ago to considerable acclaim for all the wrong reasons, this book, in its revised edition, continues to be the perfect manual for rearing politically correct bigots who dismiss as bigots all with whom they disagree.

«He was just the wrong man for the wrong time, which is nothing to do with him as a person,» said Christopher M. Bellitto, author of the book «101 Questions and Answers on Popes and the Papacy.»

Of course you can be proven wrong... your holy book was written by man, no god involved; thus your belief is based on the fairy tales told by men who saw a gullible fool a mile away - see, how easy that is??? As for the actual number being only 1.6 billion, sorry the stats say different and your opinion on who the actual number includes is moot.

You hate when people show you where you are wrong or where your bible fails... to admit the problems within that book would start to destroy your life... I feel bad for you to be living such a shallow life in need to the non-existent to get by.

GW can be a christian yes but there are some people who are catholics and christians and jehovas and atheist and so on that don't understand their wrong doing, saying God is on my side to go ahead and kill millions of innocent woman and children based on lies while the truth is for oil, that's not a real christian in my book, There's plenty of serial killers out there that says they've heard God telling them to kill.

Again you need to know the original Hebrew for LORD Isaiah 1; 9 1000 pardons wrong book, Jeremiah 1:9 LORD again is used, «The LORD reached out his hand and touched... «physical presence Isaiah 6:1 is not a parable, it is a historically dated testimony «In the year that King Uzziah died I (Isaiah) saw the LORD seated on a throne» That is Isaiah describing his meeting with God check your Hebrew easily verified 1John 1 and following read the whole book He, John touched the LORD, Jesus is LORD, Jesus is GOD.

She could write a new book and prove me wrong... but I do not think she is in it for the facts.

While the official course books treat topics like abortion and euthanasia as controversial issues for which there is no definitive judgement of right or wrong, they all have a range of topics which are presented as moral absolutes.

While I can prove Phil Roberston's assessment wrong by opening up any book on the Jim Crow Era and the Civil Right Movement, I don't think that would create space for Shalom.

Firstly, it must be remembered, that he disclaims very early in the book that he can only speak for the mainline denominations with which he is familiar, and although my memory may fail me, he implies that he can only speak for his observations of the churches / leaders with whom he is familiar, and also that he may be wrong, and also, that he is only pointing out what he calls a possible cause for the problems he has seen, and hopes that his suggestions / ideas, will be considered, researched, etc, and that time will tell if his thesis bears any truth or not.

These fears are not so different from the fear I see in the eyes of protestors carrying signs that depict President Obama as Hitler, the fear I see in the red faces of angry preachers urging their parishioners to «take America back for God,» the fear I detect in some of the books against emerging church, the fear I detect in some of the books in support of the emerging church, the fear I hear in the voices of both gays and the conservative evangelical activists who lobby against them when both sides consider for just a second the possibility that maybe they have it wrong.

There is no scripture that says anything that indicates anyone's name was ever written in the Book of Life at any time during their lives for any reason, o it seems the Arminians got that wrong.

Because according to this same book, in these times of evil (and even the most positive - minded atheist should know something is WRONG with our environment) men will distort the teachings for their own gain.

Now say me being ignorant of this Hebrew verse and the whole book itself continued with this sin, even though I know that adultery is wrong because as you say, «thank God for Grace».

Plan B by Pete Wilson is a great book for reviving hope in a person whose life has gone terribly wrong.

@Apple Bush «Wrong, the ti.tles were added by editors later for all four books.

This summary of the first two books of The Star of Redemption explains why it is not precisely wrong for Pollock to say that Rosenzweig has written a philosophical system in which he has demonstrated a particular type of All or totality.

A. Wrong, the titles were added by editors later for all four books.

Joseph Smith, who had little formal education, writes a 532 page fiction book with multiple story lines, more than three major ethnic groups that intermingle with one another, creates over 200 new names, many of which have Hebraic origin (Mosiah for instance), writes in chiasmas poetry, accurately predicts latter day pollution, international intrigue, the dispersing of the Gospel message and a host of other fictional and hysterical points was WRONG?

In his book Beegle attacked «inerrantists» for being overly rationalistic, obscurantist in fixing upon the «autographs» of Scripture, naive linguistically in thinking language can be precise, misguided in their use of proof - texting, Docetic in their denial of Scripture's humanness, and wrong in their commitment to a domino theory regarding inspiration.

The author is Archbishop Charles Chaput of Denver, the publisher is Doubleday, and the price should be no obstacle to a book that offers a fresh analysis of what has gone wrong with the Church in America, a convincing case for encouragement, wise counsel on how to engage the public square and, not incidentally, restored confidence in the ability of (some) bishops to teach on faith and morals.

For a generation to pick up a book and say, «The teachings of millenniums are wrong,» is about as self - centered and arrogant as I can imagine.

That is, without those special decoder rings for understanding his book that seems to get so much wrong...

I imagine they were trying to get all the church - goers as they left for church, because the book was called National Sunday Law and was about why it is wrong for Christians to worship in church on Sunday rather than Saturday.

Opening the phone book to «Churches» and blindly pointing to one is not the answer — this is not the time for your fingers to do the walking — but neither is bouncing to a new church when something rubs you the wrong way.

They do not in any way represent the Sikhs and if you look further you will see they have there own Gurdwara's and follow their own, militant sub-set of the Sikh religion, which if you read our holy book is totally and completely wrong and immoral and goes against everything a Sikh stands for.

I mean, if it is so wrong for an atheist to trust his own conscience, why is it so right for Christians to trust so firmly in a man - made book?

No - one will ever know in the grand scheme of it who is right or wrong because there simply is no way of telling for sure and I'm sorry your holy book doesn't cut it for me.

And now I just feel «guilty» because I respect my friend who recommended the book to me, and it «worked» for him, but it doesn't «work» for me, so I wonder what is wrong with me, or wrong with my kids, or wrong with our family.

This book reveals how terribly wrong this perspective is, and instead reveals to us that Jesus died on the cross to reveal to us what we have been doing to others (and to God) for all of human history, namely, we have been scapegoating them.

This is wrong, you are supposed to read the Bible as a book and interpret it how you will, I don't want someone to tell me what I just read, That is what my english comp class was for.

He will burn in hell for being WRONG!!!! you know your book was written a thousand years ago by people who thought that the earth is flat.

Nothing wrong with staying with the facts ma'am just the facts not the mythological comic book dreams which are not a true foundation for wisdom or logic.

Although I have to admit that David went through a very, very, hard time for his wrong doings, all of the book of Psalms was not a good time for him, but he kept YHWH in his heart wholeheartedly, and was loyal, and dedicated, with a lion's heart, so his «seeds» would get recognition in the future generations, and grace in the end, he accepted his wrong doings, and like a man dealt with them, being responsible for them.

Have we been wrong for well over two thousand years now in assuming that the book of Amos or of Jeremiah reflects the mind, personality, and utterance of the prophet Amos, the prophet Jeremiah?

someone, you are absolutely correct, these doctors are front men getting paid; and it sounds good but not good enough James, and JWT, but no matter how you change it it is not right by YHWH, and romans is not the best of book, for that matter the NT is not a guide to follow, it comes, and goes, just like christian s using what is convenient to them only to excuse the wrong.

People, there is also much that has to be discerned about the book of remembrance, the so called OT, and this NT, that I call the (Not True), book, for it does not fulfilled the OT book, it changes the laws of life, and is why we today have so much confusion of what is right, and of what is wrong, as prophesied in Isaiah 24:1 - 5, and YHWH says, He changes not in Malachi 3:6.

If you have an issue with evolutionary theory, then do your work on why it's wrong and submit it for publication and collect your many prizes (Nobel and otherwise) and rejoice at the reprinting of every single science book in the world with your theory in it.

Now every body will tell me I was wrong but I find no other explaination for such treatment but surely if we go through the Holy bibles and books of Judisem and Christianity or prophecies might we then understand why Arabs are treated like this...!!?

=============== @momoya» If you have an issue with evolutionary theory, then do your work on why it's wrong and submit it for publication and collect your many prizes (Nobel and otherwise) and rejoice at the reprinting of every single science book in the world with your theory in it.»

It was the Light because the knew creator was of Light but searched for it in the wrong sources, or made an idole of light sources to worship rather than reading and looking in to ones self by reading the light that is within the books that was meant for them to read thing and believe in to submission!.

When your god gets the very first verse of the very first chapter of the very first book wrong, it does not bode well for the rest of the book.