Sentences with phrase «wrong timing article»
Darn it, I keep quoting from the wrong Times article!
http://www.theworldsbestrealestateagent.com/ Not exact matches
Regardless of your beliefs and views, is it not tasteless for CNN to run this as their lead story on Easter morning??? Americans are appalled by anything done to insult Islam believers, so why is this felt to be appropriate??? There is nothing wrong with the article, but its timing makes it a poor and inflammatory choice of journalism, and would be taken as «persecution» if was directed toward any other belief system.
org the muslim community have condemed and said this was wrong numerous times but as usual it is downplayed over radical attacks on the news, that's why it's never heard sadly, I've seen articles online and short interviews on local tv and news papers of outrage in the muslim community over attacks but nothing out of a grand media news giant have shown.
These citations say you are wrong — and you've been given these articles many times before.
This is going on in a part of the world you probably didn't even know existed before reading this article, and would probably will never visit anyway, out of fear that your boat might take a wrong turn and fall off the edge of the «flat» earth on the way over (I'm assuming that if you intend to fly over, you'll just end up spending the entire the entire time at your local airport staring in amazement at the moving sidewalk).
Or the pair of evangelical professors who wrote an article in The New York Times, criticizing evangelical leaders for their «rejection of knowledge» and for embracing «discredited, ridiculous and even dangerous ideas» — such as believing that homosexual behavior is sinful and that Darwin was wrong.
Around a hundred years ago The Times newspaper invited prominent authors of the time to submit articles under the title «What's wrong with the world?»
Mertz should never have been our captain in the first place... who has ever heard of a team that makes 11th hour transfer buys (Arteta & Mertz) then seemingly places those same individuals into prominent leadership positions from the get - go... indicative of the problems that have permeated our clubhouse for the better part of 7 years under the Kroenke & Wenger... what is wrong with the players chosen and / or the management style of Wenger that doesn't develop and / or encourage strong leadership from within... Mertz was the fine collecting lackey from year one... this is what happens when you don't get world - class players because many times they want to have a voice on and off the pitch and this can't happen when you play for a fragile manager who has developed a coddling wage structure where everyone is rewarded for simply wearing the shirt and participating in the process... not enough balance between performance and pay, combined with the obvious favoritism shown to some players regardless of their glaring lack of production... remember that Ramsey has played in positions that make no sense considering his skill - set (out wide) and has forced other players off the field or into equally unfamiliar positions with little or no justification (let's remember when you read articles about how Ramsey's goals this upcoming season being the potential X-factor for our success that this is the same individual who didn't score a goal until the final week last season)... this of course is just one example of many... before I hear another word from Mertz I want this club to address the fact that no former player of any real consequence has any important role in the management structure of this club, yet several former Gunners have expressed serious interest in just such an endeavor (Henry, Viera, Adams, Bergkamp... just to name a few legends)... there is only one answer: an extremely insecure manager!!!
- and articles about the same thing about benzema has been written about 41 times this month alone, so why is it suddenly wrong when all guns blazing does the exact same thing like the writers and commenters?..
talk about skewing the stats to fit your own conclusions... this is like a slap in the face to every real Arsenal fan... have you no shame, have you no dignity, have you no sense of right from wrong... if you think everything was so well orchestrated why is everyone and their brother laughing at the way in which we conduct business both on and off the field... either you're a paid hack or a delusional buffoon... regardless you can't be a genuine Arsenal fan because the difficulties facing this club having been going on for years and this latest episode in our pathetic recent history is but a glaring reminder of how far we have fallen... I'm not going to waste my time discrediting every single ridiculous statement you made in your love letter to Wenger, but if you write another article I will gladly expose you for the fraud you truly are... this club is in desperate need of a serious cleansing and for you to try and package this dog and pony show as a well - oiled machine is a direct insult to anyone who has supported this team during the supposed «lean» years... the deceptive and disrespectful manner in which this organization has treated it's fans is an abomination to supporters everywhere and for you to even try to justify their actions is akin to saying just shut - up and keep filling our pockets... so please crawl back under whatever stone you crawled out from under and think carefully before you spew this type of propaganda ever again
As for the Article, Theres nothing wrong with it and Yes, Wenger's reaction does come across as if it's the first time he saw Perez play.
sorry to sai but this article is pointless and more importantly, came and the wrong time... did u watch the liverpool vs barca match... I'll pretty sure we'll b dismantled like that....
The timing of the Article is all but wrong.
never waste CAPITAL LETTERS on an article about Chambers at this juncture... I still can't believe that no one from management has ever explained why such a frugal club spent so much money on him in the first place... we haggle for months and years with clubs for players who could have a monumental impact on the very future of our club but somehow we found $ 16 million for someone who couldn't regularly crack a Southampton lineup (very fishy)... don't get me wrong, I like what he showed at times last season in Middlesbourogh but from the handful of games I watched him play I still have some serious questions about his consistency as a back - line player in the EPL; as such he should prove himself on loan for another season, making sure that he goes to a team that wants him in the starting 11... bottom line, let's not get bogged down with the semantics of peripheral players and focus on the real task at hand = figure out who the hell is going to be our starting 11 for the foreseeable future, which means getting contracts signed, getting rid of a lot of deadwood and bringing in talented players into the positions which truly need upgrading... the rest is just unnecessary noise
Wish thinking is something we can discuss for the time being but our season was over even before it began even Usmanov on his article a while ago said Arsenal needs two world class players in every position but our below average manager thinks the other way try to prove everyone wrong and keep pushing young players who are not ready for 1st team he has been doing experience for over ten years now and still he can't see it!
A few times a day, I stumble across a parenting article that swears I am doing everything wrong and irrevocably maring my poor children.
Although I agree that an infant can become dependent on the breast to fall asleep and yes, once I gently weaned my daughter from night time feeds at around 10 months she did sleep for longer stretches but it by no means solved all our sleep «issues» — To say that all healthy infants should be able to STTN at 6 months, is an incredibly discouraging thing to say to moms who then start thinking there is something wrong with their child and in the end let them cry it out because they read articles like this where it worked for one person.
I remember the article saying a woman has to BF during the day for 100 + minutes (I could be wrong about the amount of time) to delay fertility.
As Michela Wrong pointed out in an article written at the time of the first DRC elections in 2006 — and which still proves potentially timely for today's situation — «If all hell breaks loose in the DRC [after the elections]... it will be tragic evidence of the damage a very human inclination to hope for the best can do» (Wrong, 2006).
I am only an observer here, but after another article critical of someone who does not agree with RealClimate's view, I must say that I think it is an eyebrow - raising coincidence that there appears to be a 1:1 ratio between those scientists who disagree with RC's CC view, and those scientists who, according to RC, are wrong - headed, every single time, in nearly every instance except the most minor.
After reading your article on insulin, I'm thinking that I eat carbs at the wrong time of the day.
Maybe you've heard of it, maybe you haven't, but in the kinds of places I like to hang out the internet has been all up in a twitch over an article published in the New York Times earlier this month titled Why Everything We Know About Salt May Be Wrong.
If you're new to the paleo approach, the Taubes article is a rich goldmine of information, and a great antidote to the wrong - headedness of the NY Times piece.
As described in «Out of Sync,» an article in the current issue of The Scientist, eating at the wrong time can throw off the body's metabolic cycles, leading to weight gain and other problems.
This article helped me understand what's wrong with my current color and what I need to tell her to do different next time.»
Either way, right or wrong, this is article where some of this information is heard about for the first time.
As Michael Fullan points out in his article entitled, «Choosing the Wrong Drivers for Whole School Reform,» real reform takes place when schools have the time and resources to focus on student learning, instruction, and assessment.
In an article titled «Right Answer, Wrong Score: Test Flaws Take Toll,» the Sunday New York Times reported that exam manufacturers «can not guarantee the kind of error - free, high - speed testing that parent, educators and politicians seem to take for granted.»
I was glad when I took a glance at the title, I thought Financial Times has developed an user client, so i use install in my IE and avant browser.but after reading part of this article, I knew I was wrong....
Nice article, but there's so much wrong with that statement, and surprised to see it being stated by an author (who knows just how much time and effort and money goes into writing a book).
Don't get me wrong, it is a good article, but for an insurance analyst that spent time analyzing the mortgage insurers, it is old news.
At a time like this, a bevy of survey articles come out to describe what has gone wrong.
I have «gone wrong» many times and in many areas of my life, but let's keep this article focused on my dealings as a shareholder of General Electric (GE).
I had been thinking about it for a long time but felt a little lost at how to do it, what product to use, being concerned to do it wrong but Carol's article truly help me start and I will be forever grateful for that.
A long time ago, Falcon Game Reviews wrote a fantastic article about all the things wrong with the way the gaming industry handles DLC and microtransactions, putting a number of aspects of modern gaming in his crosshairs.
The main thing is that the Time article gives a correct overall impression of the nature of the problem, even if it is wrong in some of the details.
The NY Times has a long article describing how billions of dollars is being spent, but somehow it seems to be going to the wrong places.
Unfortunately, the New York Times gets it wrong and corrupts the meaning of our article when it says:
I don't have time to deal with every one of the mistakes his article contains — it takes 100 times as long to show why a claim is wrong as it does to make it — but here's a quick breakdown, beginning with the first sentence: (I've been able to pull this together with the help of the Climate Science Rapid Response Team, which put me in touch with the relevant scientists and pointed me to the primary datasets.)
Many times in the past, when WUWT does an article about Monckton, they are all over the page whining about this or that or stating he's been proven wrong about this or that.
The most recent article includes cases where lawyers were sanctioned for appealing a case based on a knowingly false claim, the dismissal of an appeal for failing to file a brief (after two extensions of time), and a decision in which the appellate court found the controlling contract provision itself, after both sides had been arguing the wrong provision since the trial began.
Some time ago I wrote an article titled «Lying on Resumes Alarmingly Common», where I referenced a newspaper article with the heading «Official Résumé Wrong»!
The article presumes that the wronged party is a husband, and many times this is true, but I can say from my experience that false allegations of abuse in high conflict custody cases know no gender: