Sentences with phrase «ypi callous»

Youths from the high - risk sample with a higher score on the YPI callous and unemotional scale had a higher probability for having committed non-violent offenses than youths scoring low on this scale.

Next, we considered the YPI callous and unemotional scale for non-violent offenses (Table 1, Model 2); the first block significantly predicted non-violent offenses [χ2 (4) = 140.25, p < 0.001; Nagelkerke R2 = 0.15].

Meaning that having a higher score on the YPI callous and unemotional scale increased the probability for having committed non-violent offenses for youths from the high - risk sample and not for youths from the general population sample.

In addition, the two - way interaction term sample × YPI callous and unemotional contributed significantly to the regression equation.

Not exact matches

Although some studies include the antisocial dimension as a fourth dimension, the YPI assesses three dimensions: grandiose / manipulative (interpersonal), callous / unemotional (affective), and impulsive / irresponsible (behavioral) psychopathic personality dimensions (Hare 1991).

However, there was a moderating effect of sample for the relationship between the callous and unemotional YPI scale and non-violent offenses.

Youths from the high - risk sample scored significantly higher than youths from the general population sample on all the YPI scales: grandiose - manipulative [10.58 versus 9.38; t (587) = 7.06, p < 0.001], callous and unemotional [11.01 versus 9.84; t (1218) = 7.77, p < 0.001], and impulsive - irresponsible [12.92 versus 11.36; t (577) = 9.33, p < 0.001].

Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFA) showed that the variance of the YPI subscales could be explained by the three latent constructs, the grandiose / manipulative dimension (interpersonal), the callous / unemotional dimension (affective), and the impulsive / irresponsible dimension (behavioral), replicating the findings of Andershed et al. (2002).