Sentences with phrase «yield investors seem»

Not exact matches

Every oasis seems to turn into a mirage, as investors rush into a class of high - yielding investments only to push the prices up — and the yields effectively down.

In combination with their relatively high yields, these features made them seem highly attractive to investors.

I think every dividend growth investor gravitates to where the best value and yield can be found and for many months, the Canadian banks seemed to offer both which is why I continue to nibble in that sector.

In the meantime, investors do not seem to be concerned by the interest rate warnings and continue to fuel the ETF market looking for the greatest amount of yield.

While Treasury yields may seem unappetizing to U.S. investors, they are much higher than in some other developed markets — like Germany.

It is interesting to note, however, that investors do seem to be differentiating between the various types of high - yield investments.

Going forward, it seems that BWW will need to find a way to continue appealing to consumers with changing tastes and preferences, while also better controlling costs to improve profitability, as the company seeks to deliver the above - average returns it historically yielded for investors until recently.

All in, investors seem to prefer to sell zero - yielding companies before they sell the companies willing to «pay them to wait» for appreciation.

Investors seem to believe that those yields are relatively safe, unlike yields from oil and gas partnerships, some of which are in the stratosphere due to the plunge in share prices.

Indeed, because all of this yield seeking has driven a persistent uptrend in speculative assets in recent years, investors seem to believe that «QE just makes prices go up» in a way that ensures a permanent future of diagonally escalating prices.

To me it looks like that in the short term and in the current yield starved environment, investors seem to prefer the dividend yield compared to the ecoenomically better share buy backs which I find very interesting.

It seems everyone is talking about the yield curve right now, but most economists and investors are quick to dismiss that it may actually be a red flag worth paying close attention to.

Market Killer When rates are low, investors reach for yield beyond what seems logical, according to a study outlined in The Wall Street Journal, which concluded that if rates rise and investors revert to less risky portfolios, equities could «be in for a big drop.»

It seems that DOLLAR - based investors are searching for any type of investment that can yield more than inflation.

It seems like investors are hoping to sell the debt elsewhere and make a profit when, and if, prices go up when yields fall.

On Tuesday, in response to evidence of accelerating yield pressures, as well the recognition that QE2 was much further along than investors widely seem to believe, we substantially cut our bond duration to about 1.5 years in Strategic Total Return.

With two accurate warnings that followed - in 2000 and again in 2007 - the yield curve seems to have taken on a special status with analysts and investors.

All in, investors seem to prefer to sell zero - yielding companies before they sell the companies willing to «pay them to wait» for appreciation.

It would seem that investors are perhaps chasing yield in the current extremely low - yield environment, but not other measures of relative value.

But like I said earlier, I understand why investors are looking for more yield and preferred stocks may seem attractive on the surface.

But overall, the scope for capital gains seems compelling, noting particularly the recent 10 - 15 % pa rent increases (albeit, interrupted by the recent heavy - handed two year rent freeze), though obviously this should already be reflected within the IRES portfolio valuation / yield & investors» total return expectations — a 1.0 Price / Book ratio still seems appropriate: Continue reading →

At least that seems to be the conventional wisdom: Mortgage REITs and their high yields are just too risky for the average investor.

Even the revered bond investor Howard Marks, who appears correctly concerned about the depressed risk premiums in high - yield debt, seems to give a pass to stocks.

If you're a real estate or stock market investor, then a 1.5 % yield on a savings account may not seem very exciting.

As you've mentioned, on the first view $ 83 seems not very high over the year, but other investors would need to invest $ 2300 based on 3,5 % yield to receive the same.

Besides, while bonds certainly seem risky in that at their current low yields they're especially vulnerable to rising rates, viewed from another angle they may be a lot more valuable than many investors realize.

But overall, the scope for capital gains seems compelling, noting particularly the recent 10 - 15 % pa rent increases (albeit, interrupted by the recent heavy - handed two year rent freeze), though obviously this should already be reflected within the IRES portfolio valuation / yield & investors» total return expectations — a 1.0 Price / Book ratio still seems appropriate: