CLIENT ALERT: Recent New
York Federal Court Decision Confirms Applicability of the Americans with Disabilities Act to Various Commercial Consumer - Oriented Websites as Places of «Public Accommodation»
In a 1992 New
York federal court decision about glide paths for aircraft on county property (County of Westchester v. Town of Greenwich, Connecticut), the court wryly observed: «Aircraft regularly passing overhead during their landings and takeoffs are hard to miss.
Not exact matches
«While we had significant victories in the
federal district
courts in New
York and Boston and the Second Circuit
Court of Appeals, the reversal of the Second Circuit
decision in June by the U.S. Supreme
Court has proven difficult to overcome,» Kanojia conceded in a blog post titled «The «Next Chapter.»
· Amend The Penal Law To Prohibit Undisclosed Self - Dealing By Public Officials: To address the Supreme
Court's
decision in Skilling, which severely hampered the
federal government's ability to prosecute cases involving deprivation of «honest services» by public officials, New
York State should enact a felony - level crime of «Undisclosed Self - Dealing» to target public officials who further their own financial self - interest while purporting to be acting on behalf of their constituents or government employer.
The U.S. Justice Department has filed
court papers in a New
York case arguing that a major
federal civil rights law does not protect employees from discrimination based on sexual orientation, taking a stand against a
decision reached under President Barack Obama.
An 11 - page policy paper released by the New
York Public Interest Research Group on Friday takes issue with the state Board of Elections to suspend the aggregate political contribution limits in the wake of the Supreme
Court decision, McCutcheon v.
Federal Election Commission.
The justices let stand a
decision by the
federal appeals
court in New
York last year that threw out insider trading convictions of two high - profile hedge fund managers.
The New
York federal appeals
court denied the pagan ex-politician's request in a
decision released yesterday.
In a $ 60 million lawsuit filed in New
York federal court, Optima Media Group is attributing a
decision by Bloomberg LLP to walk away from an African television partnership to negative publicity.
As the U.S. Supreme
Court's
decision in Roe v. Wade marked its 45th anniversary yesterday, efforts to codify the
federal law's abortion protections in New
York law continue at the start of the legislative session.
A
federal appeals
court on Thursday overturned the 2015 corruption conviction of Sheldon Silver, once the powerful speaker of the New York State Assembly, saying the judge's jury instructions were in error in light of a United States Supreme Court decision that has since narrowed the legal definition of corrup
court on Thursday overturned the 2015 corruption conviction of Sheldon Silver, once the powerful speaker of the New
York State Assembly, saying the judge's jury instructions were in error in light of a United States Supreme
Court decision that has since narrowed the legal definition of corrup
Court decision that has since narrowed the legal definition of corruption.
A
federal appeals
court's decision to overturn the convictions of former New York State Assembly speaker Sheldon Silver shows how public corruption cases have become much more difficult to substantiate in the wake of a Supreme Court decision narrowing what qualifies as corruption, legal analysts
court's
decision to overturn the convictions of former New
York State Assembly speaker Sheldon Silver shows how public corruption cases have become much more difficult to substantiate in the wake of a Supreme
Court decision narrowing what qualifies as corruption, legal analysts
Court decision narrowing what qualifies as corruption, legal analysts said.
For example, the
federal appeals
court in Chicago (7th Circuit) will still make its own determination on the appeals for the Cook County and Chicago ordinances and will not be required to follow the
decisions on appeal in Phoenix and New
York because they are in a different circuit.
The
Federal Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, holding that it was not appropriate for the
Federal Court judge to rely on the
decision of the New
York Court of Appeals to effectively overturn relevant
decisions of the Alberta and British Columbia
courts.
Members of the group monitor state and
federal appellate
courts in Pennsylvania, Delaware, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New
York, as well as the Supreme
Court of the United States, to report breaking appellate
decisions important to our clients.
The
Court of Appeals then summarized
decisions from the Second and Fifth Circuits addressing whether the New
York Convention applied to the states as a treaty or as implementing
federal lesiglation, and the Fourth Circuit saw a conflict in the holdings of the Second and Fifth Circuits.
According to Law 360, «[t] he
federal government on Wednesday [December 10, 2014] joined state bar associations from California, Florida, New
York, Texas and others urging the U.S. Supreme
Court to reverse a Fifth Circuit
decision that overturned fees associated with Baker Botts LLP's $ 117 million fee award for defending Asarco LLC in the mining company's bankruptcy.»
In line with a growing trend reflected in
decisions from state supreme
courts (those in Georgia, Massachusetts and Oregon), as well as from several
federal trial
courts, the New
York intermediate appeals
court recognized that «attorneys who have sought the advice of their law firm's in - house general counsel on their ethical obligations in representing a firm client may [properly] invoke [the] attorney - client privilege to resist the client's demand for the disclosure of communications seeking or giving such advice.»
York University
decision Update on the lawsuit between Access Copyright and
York University: on July 12, 2017, the
Federal Court delivered its
decision in favour of Access Copyright and ruled that
York University's guidelines (which were very similar — possibly identical — to Université Laval's) did not meet the requirements of the fair dealing exception.
In July 2017, the
Federal Court released its
decision in The Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency («Access Copyright») v
York University, 2017 FC 669.
In their latest New
York Law Journal column on
Federal E-Discovery, litigation partners Christopher Boehning and Daniel Toal discuss a recent district
court decision that applied the new version of Rule 26 (b)(1) of the...
In their latest column on
Federal E-Discovery, litigation partners Chris Boehning and Dan Toal discuss two recent federal district court decisions, including one from the Southern District of New York, that threaten sanction
Federal E-Discovery, litigation partners Chris Boehning and Dan Toal discuss two recent
federal district court decisions, including one from the Southern District of New York, that threaten sanction
federal district
court decisions, including one from the Southern District of New
York, that threaten sanctions on...
After the
court decision in Mr. Merrill's case, a
federal judge in the Eastern District of New
York denied gag orders in more than a dozen cases related to Facebook subpoenas last May.
In a case previously summarized in the The Letter of the Law, a New
York federal court has considered whether a jury properly awarded damages to a handicapped individual who was alleging discrimination against an apartment - locating service - click here to read the earlier
decision in this case.