Sentences with phrase «york appeals court decision»

The feature story notes a New York appeals court decision affirming a lower court's order denying a community group's attempt to renew a challenge to $ 84 million in city tax subsidies approved for FreshDirect LLC to move its distribution center to Harlem River Yard in the Bronx.

Not exact matches

«While we had significant victories in the federal district courts in New York and Boston and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, the reversal of the Second Circuit decision in June by the U.S. Supreme Court has proven difficult to overcome,» Kanojia conceded in a blog post titled «The «Next Chapter.»

The decision by the New York Court of Appeals gives such individuals legal standing to seek custody or visitation rights.

The decision by the state's Court of Appeals is the latest victory for the New York attorney general's office, which has been pursuing the case for 11 years.

Election - integrity advocates nationwide are celebrating a decision by a New York state appeals court that classifies electronic ballot images as public records.

However, the de Blasio administration is entitled to cancel the City's contract with QDG, and to rescind the sale of two acres of Willets Point property already transferred to QDG for $ 1, due to the recent decision of the New York State Court of Appeals which found that QDG's proposed «Willets West» mega-mall on parkland located west of Citi Field stadium can not proceed as it lacks legislative approval.

Suffolk County lawmakers and farmers are supporting the county's decision to appeal a recent New York State Supreme Court ruling that deems development on preserved farmland illegal.

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday threw out the 2015 conviction of former New York State Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver on honest services fraud because the charge to the jury did not comport with the Supreme Court's 2016 decision in the case of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, which narrowed the definition of an «official act.»

The justices let stand a decision by the federal appeals court in New York last year that threw out insider trading convictions of two high - profile hedge fund managers.

The NYCLU — along with Public Advocate Letitia James, the Legal Aid Society, the NAACP and the New York Post — filed the appeal in the appellate division of New York Supreme Court to overturn a judge's decision not to release testimony from the grand jury.

The New York federal appeals court denied the pagan ex-politician's request in a decision released yesterday.

Legislators, union leaders and activists rallied outside City Hall today to attack Gov. Andrew Cuomo for what they alleged was his failure to honor a Court of Appeals decision in the Campaign for Fiscal Equity v. New York State case, which determined that Albany had shortchanged New York City schools some $ 15 billion.

[39] The reinstatement of the death penalty was later suspended by the New York Court of Appeals (the state's highest court) in a 4 — 3 deciCourt of Appeals (the state's highest court) in a 4 — 3 decicourt) in a 4 — 3 decision.

Howie Hawkins hailed the New York Court of Appeals decision announced today that upholds the right of municipal governments to ban fracking within their jurisdictions.

A federal appeals court on Thursday overturned the 2015 corruption conviction of Sheldon Silver, once the powerful speaker of the New York State Assembly, saying the judge's jury instructions were in error in light of a United States Supreme Court decision that has since narrowed the legal definition of corrupcourt on Thursday overturned the 2015 corruption conviction of Sheldon Silver, once the powerful speaker of the New York State Assembly, saying the judge's jury instructions were in error in light of a United States Supreme Court decision that has since narrowed the legal definition of corrupCourt decision that has since narrowed the legal definition of corruption.

In its conclusion, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Manhattan cited a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court decision last year that allowed Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell to escape ethics charges, the New York Times reported.

A federal appeals court's decision to overturn the convictions of former New York State Assembly speaker Sheldon Silver shows how public corruption cases have become much more difficult to substantiate in the wake of a Supreme Court decision narrowing what qualifies as corruption, legal analysts court's decision to overturn the convictions of former New York State Assembly speaker Sheldon Silver shows how public corruption cases have become much more difficult to substantiate in the wake of a Supreme Court decision narrowing what qualifies as corruption, legal analysts Court decision narrowing what qualifies as corruption, legal analysts said.

In response, UFT President Michael Mulgrew said, «Given the harm that could be done by the release of these misleading and inaccurate reports, we will be filing a motion directly with the New York State Court of Appeals seeking leave to appeal the Appellate Division's decision in this case.»

That measure was explicitly rejected in the New York Court of Appeals decision, which the referees were being asked to implement.

A state appeals court in New York has reversed a landmark school finance decision that had ordered lawmakers to overhaul the state's school funding system.

For example, the federal appeals court in Chicago (7th Circuit) will still make its own determination on the appeals for the Cook County and Chicago ordinances and will not be required to follow the decisions on appeal in Phoenix and New York because they are in a different circuit.

If the worker disagrees with the panel's decision, the worker has 30 days to file a written appeal with the Appellate Division, Third Department, Supreme Court of the State of New York.

Unanimously allowing the appeal, nothing in s 103 (2) or (3)(or in the underlying provisions of article V of the New York Convention) provides a power to make an enforcing court's decision on an issue raised under these provisions conditional on an award debtor providing security in respect of the award.

Won dismissal of legal malpractice claims (and secured award of fees) in a decision affirmed by the New York State Court of Appeals

A recent Court of Appeals (New York's top court) Decision has New York personal injury lawyers «reading the Riot Act» to their cliCourt of Appeals (New York's top court) Decision has New York personal injury lawyers «reading the Riot Act» to their clicourt) Decision has New York personal injury lawyers «reading the Riot Act» to their clients.

Bloomberg BNA quoted Ronald Minkoff in an article on New York Court of Appeals» decision in the matter of In re Thelen LLP, 2014 NY Slip Op. 04879 (N.Y. Ct. of App., July 1, 2014).

In a recent decision of the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, Maryland's intermediate appellate court addressed the question of whether a New York resident could be subject to personal jurisdiction in a Maryland paternity and support action based on his filing of an answer to the original complaint for custody, his request for genetic testing, and his request for discoCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland, Maryland's intermediate appellate court addressed the question of whether a New York resident could be subject to personal jurisdiction in a Maryland paternity and support action based on his filing of an answer to the original complaint for custody, his request for genetic testing, and his request for discocourt addressed the question of whether a New York resident could be subject to personal jurisdiction in a Maryland paternity and support action based on his filing of an answer to the original complaint for custody, his request for genetic testing, and his request for discovery.

The Federal Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, holding that it was not appropriate for the Federal Court judge to rely on the decision of the New York Court of Appeals to effectively overturn relevant decisions of the Alberta and British Columbia cAppeal allowed the appeal, holding that it was not appropriate for the Federal Court judge to rely on the decision of the New York Court of Appeals to effectively overturn relevant decisions of the Alberta and British Columbia cappeal, holding that it was not appropriate for the Federal Court judge to rely on the decision of the New York Court of Appeals to effectively overturn relevant decisions of the Alberta and British Columbia courts.

Abbott, Austin, 1831 - 1896 Title Abbott's New York digest: table of cases criticised, presenting decisions of the courts of the state of New York, which have been affirmed, reversed or modified in error or on appeal, or examined and explained, limited, questioned, overruled, or approved and followed in later decisions of American or English courts, or by commentators and text writers: from the earliest period to January 1, 1887 / ed.

In a narrow 4 — 3 decision, the New York Court of Appeals held that the motion court's conditioning the defendant's plea on the withdrawal of his constitutional speedy trial claim did not run afoul of the Court's long - standing precedents in People v. Blakley, 34 N.Y. 2d 311 (1974) and People v. White, 32 N.Y. 2d 393 (1Court of Appeals held that the motion court's conditioning the defendant's plea on the withdrawal of his constitutional speedy trial claim did not run afoul of the Court's long - standing precedents in People v. Blakley, 34 N.Y. 2d 311 (1974) and People v. White, 32 N.Y. 2d 393 (1court's conditioning the defendant's plea on the withdrawal of his constitutional speedy trial claim did not run afoul of the Court's long - standing precedents in People v. Blakley, 34 N.Y. 2d 311 (1974) and People v. White, 32 N.Y. 2d 393 (1Court's long - standing precedents in People v. Blakley, 34 N.Y. 2d 311 (1974) and People v. White, 32 N.Y. 2d 393 (1973).

In his view, Lord Mance said the Court of Appeal had erred with its justification that an enforcing court could make the decision, under the provisions of s103 and article V of the New York Convention, of an issue raised under either subsection, conditional upon the provision of security by the award debtor in respect of the award, there were no such provisions in either s103 nor articCourt of Appeal had erred with its justification that an enforcing court could make the decision, under the provisions of s103 and article V of the New York Convention, of an issue raised under either subsection, conditional upon the provision of security by the award debtor in respect of the award, there were no such provisions in either s103 nor articcourt could make the decision, under the provisions of s103 and article V of the New York Convention, of an issue raised under either subsection, conditional upon the provision of security by the award debtor in respect of the award, there were no such provisions in either s103 nor article V.

The New York Court of Appeals, which is the highest state appellate court in New York, recently released a decision affirming two lower court decisions to exclude a plaintiff's proposed expert witnesses in a personal injury case filed on behalf of a child who was born with serious birth defects and disabilities alleged to have resulted from his mother inhaling gasoline fumes while she was pregnant withCourt of Appeals, which is the highest state appellate court in New York, recently released a decision affirming two lower court decisions to exclude a plaintiff's proposed expert witnesses in a personal injury case filed on behalf of a child who was born with serious birth defects and disabilities alleged to have resulted from his mother inhaling gasoline fumes while she was pregnant withcourt in New York, recently released a decision affirming two lower court decisions to exclude a plaintiff's proposed expert witnesses in a personal injury case filed on behalf of a child who was born with serious birth defects and disabilities alleged to have resulted from his mother inhaling gasoline fumes while she was pregnant withcourt decisions to exclude a plaintiff's proposed expert witnesses in a personal injury case filed on behalf of a child who was born with serious birth defects and disabilities alleged to have resulted from his mother inhaling gasoline fumes while she was pregnant with him.

The New York Court of Appeals issued a decision holding that when two parties agree to the material terms of a sale, the parties have entered into a binding agreement, even though the sale remains subject to the execution of a written sales agreement.

The Court of Appeals then summarized decisions from the Second and Fifth Circuits addressing whether the New York Convention applied to the states as a treaty or as implementing federal lesiglation, and the Fourth Circuit saw a conflict in the holdings of the Second and Fifth Circuits.

The English Court of Appeal has today handed down a unanimous judgment dismissing an appeal from the earlier Commercial Court decision of Phillips J upholding the enforcement of a New York Convention (CIETAC) Arbitration Award for a significant US dollaAppeal has today handed down a unanimous judgment dismissing an appeal from the earlier Commercial Court decision of Phillips J upholding the enforcement of a New York Convention (CIETAC) Arbitration Award for a significant US dollaappeal from the earlier Commercial Court decision of Phillips J upholding the enforcement of a New York Convention (CIETAC) Arbitration Award for a significant US dollar sum.

In our October 22, 2010 post, we reported on the New York Court of Appeals» decision in Flemming v. Barnwell Nursing, which denied awarding attorney's fees to a class action settlement objector whose efforts helped reduce requested class counsel fees of $ 448,000 down to $ 425,000 in a $ 950,000 settlement.

The Ontario Court of Appeal recently released its decision in Thorne v. Hudson Estate, 2017 ONCA 208, which arose out of the crash of a twin - engine Beech aircraft in New York State.

In 2013, she successfully argued for reversal by the New York State Court of Appeals of an adverse decision by an intermediate appellate court in a lease interpretation matter, thereby obtaining dismissal of the suit in its entirety against her clCourt of Appeals of an adverse decision by an intermediate appellate court in a lease interpretation matter, thereby obtaining dismissal of the suit in its entirety against her clcourt in a lease interpretation matter, thereby obtaining dismissal of the suit in its entirety against her client.

In line with a growing trend reflected in decisions from state supreme courts (those in Georgia, Massachusetts and Oregon), as well as from several federal trial courts, the New York intermediate appeals court recognized that «attorneys who have sought the advice of their law firm's in - house general counsel on their ethical obligations in representing a firm client may [properly] invoke [the] attorney - client privilege to resist the client's demand for the disclosure of communications seeking or giving such advice.»

Laval argued that its policy on the use of third - party works was similar to York's policy and that the appeal court's decision in that case could impact the fair dealing analysis in the class action.

The Ontario Court of Appeal recently released its decision in Jaffer v. York University, 2010 ONCA 654, which reaffirms the proposition that the Superior Court of Justice does have jurisdiction over academic disputes that are grounded in contract or tort.

In a long - awaited decision, the New York Court of Appeals in Kramer v. Phoenix Life Ins.

DOJ's Decision Denies Courts Guidance on When to Authorize Tracking San Francisco - The US Department of Justice (DOJ) has told the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) that it will not appeal a New York decision that forcefully rejected its request to track a cell phone user without first showing proDecision Denies Courts Guidance on When to Authorize Tracking San Francisco - The US Department of Justice (DOJ) has told the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) that it will not appeal a New York decision that forcefully rejected its request to track a cell phone user without first showing prodecision that forcefully rejected its request to track a cell phone user without first showing probable...

The decision was appealed and sent to the New York Second Circuit Appeals Court.

MODIFICATION PETITIONS In the landmark case of Tropea v. Tropea, the New York Court of Appeals ruled that decisions on relocation requests must be made on an individual basis, taking into consideration all facts specific to each case.

The New York Court of Appeals in March issued a decision that provides clarity for New York business partnerships,... twitter.com/i/web/status/9...