Sentences with phrase «abatement policies»

This is at the heart of problems with AGW theory — There is no evidence that climate sensitivity to CO2 is anywhere near large enough to justify the scary scenarios spun by AGW supporters nor to justify the draconian abatement policies they advocate.
The European Commission said that the benefits of avoiding catastrophic climate change will clearly outweigh the costs of abatement policies.
A plethora of integrated assessment models (IAMs) have been constructed and used to estimate the social cost of carbon (SCC) and evaluate alternative abatement policies.
Parry, Ian W.H., Williams III, R.C. and L.H. Goulder (1997), When Can Carbon Abatement Policies Increase Welfare?
He suggests that since the Copenhagen failure in 2009, the prospects for substantial emission - abatement policies in the foreseeable future are so low that the availability of a substitute could not drive them any lower.
Bovenburg, A. and L. Goulder, 2001: Neutralizing the adverse industry impacts of CO2 abatement policies: What does it cost?
Thirdly, a substantial portion of the economic impact (previous modelling exercises indicate around one third) is due not to Australia's carbon abatement policies but to the actions of other countries.
That level is in practice impossible to calculate or predict with accuracy, particularly when abatement policies are in place.
The geo - clique are lobbying for a huge injection of public funds into geoengineering research, justified on the grounds that «the world» (read America in the era of the Tea Party) will never countenance the carbon abatement policies we so badly need.
Goulder, L. H. and S. H. Schneider (1999): «Induced technological change and the attractiveness of CO2 abatement policies,» Resource and Energy Economics, 21, 211 - 253.
That would be a horrible scenario, since we all know noise - abatement policies don't work and the only way to reduce noise at the airport is to restrict aircraft use, as this town board has done by passing legislation to implement curfews and restrict the frequency of use of the noisiest aircraft, mainly helicopters.
Also at noon, NYC Council members call on the NYPD to adjust its noise abatement policy, City Hall steps, Manhattan.
K. Dobesova, J. Apt, and L. B. Lave, «Are Renewable Portfolio Standards Cost - Effective Emission Abatement Policy
One can think of a GHG abatement policy as a form of insurance: society would be paying for a guarantee that a low - probability catastrophe will not occur (or is less likely).
The benefits will depend on preference parameters, but if they are sufficiently large and robust to reasonable ranges for those parameters, it would support a stringent abatement policy.

Not exact matches

Cuomo and de Blasio exchanged increasingly heated words over the tax abatement issue over the weekend, though the rhetoric has cooled in recent days after the governor in a radio interview called the mayor «a friend» even as they have disagreements over policy.
Policy agendas for important issues like the 421a tax abatement and New York City rent laws are being set by publicly elected leaders who have become dependent on the real estate industry's onslaught of millions of dollars in campaign contributions.
But despite an end - of - session slate of bills passing that included needed extensions for rent control, the property tax cap, the 421a tax abatement and mayoral control of New York City schools, it's likely unresolved policy questions will linger through the rest of the year.
And in early 2015, the city said, it adopted a new policy in which it prioritized the payment of reimbursement funds while creating procedures to ensure that legally required lead abatement would be completed.
«This proposed abatement would be really historically bad public policy.
When considering options for using CERs from registered projects, a key question for policy makers is whether the projects are likely to continue greenhouse gas (GHG) abatement even in the absence of CDM revenues or whether they are vulnerable of discontinuing abatement.
Below is the AmeriFirst Home Mortgage Mold Policy for when home buyers are considering a renovation loan and the need for remediation or the abatement of MOLD is warranted.
The December Scientific American has a fine article laying out the policy landscape for climate change abatement.
That isn't the track the world has been on for over 20 years as many policies have led to abatement cost multiples above what was necessary.
The SkyShares model enables users to relate a target limit for temperature change to a global emissions ceiling; to allocate this emissions budget across countries using different policy rules; and then uses estimated marginal abatement costs to calculate the costs faced by each country of decarbonising to meet its emissions budget, with the costs for each country depending in part on whether and how much carbon trading is allowed.
When denominated by such indicators, all responsible projections indicate that we expect to be made worse off by coercive policies to force immediate, aggressive abatement of carbon dioxide emissions.
I've used the present value abatement costs and the projected global temperature change for the mitigation policies listed in Table 5 - 1 to calculate the cost per °C temperature change avoided.
Therefore, in arguing policy, I suggest we should compare policy options on the basis of the «CO2 abatement cost» of different policies.
The cost per °C temperature change avoided is calculated from the present value abatement costs and the projected global temperature change for the mitigation policies listed in Table 5 - 1.
We need new policies, regulatory frameworks, and institutions focused on four areas: creating market - based incentives to innovate and raise carbon productivity; addressing market failures that prevent abatement opportunities from being captured profitably; resolving issues of allocation and fairness, in particular between the developed and developing worlds and between industry sectors; and accelerating progress to avoid missing critical emissions targets.
Importantly, what is missing, is the analysis of the probability that a chosen policy would deliver the projected benefits for the projected abatement costs.
Costs and benefits of the proposed mitigation policy compared with no mitigation policy Item; Units; Optimal Carbon Price; Low - cost backstop; Table Benefits (Reduced damages); 2006 US $ trillion; 5.23; 17.63; 5 - 3 Abatement Cost; 2007 US $ trillion; 2.16; 0.44; 5 - 3 Net Benefit of policy; 2005 US $ trillion; 3.37; 17.19; 5 - 1 Implied CO2 Tax; 2005 US $ / ton C; 202.4; 4.1; 5 - 1 CO2 emissions in 2100; Gt C / a; 11; 0; 5 - 6 CO2 concentration in 2100; ppm CO2; 586; 340; 5 - 7 Global temperature change in 2100; °C from 1900; 2.61; 0.9; 5 - 1
Comparing these two policies the «Low cost backstop» policy gives 3 times higher benefits, 5 times lower abatement costs, 5 times higher net benefits, and a 50 times lower implied carbon tax.
Item Optimal Carbon Price Low - cost backstop Benefits (Reduced damages) 5.23 17.63 Abatement Cost 2.16 0.44 Net Benefit of policy 3.37 17.19 Implied CO2 Tax 202.4 4.1 CO2 emissions in 2100 (Gt C / a) 11 0 CO2 concentration in 2100 (ppm CO2) 586 340 Global temperature change in 2100 (°C from 1900) 2.61 0.9
Climate policy through the abatement of greenhouse gas emissions is important, given the likelihood that continued warming of the planet could lead to other (sometimes irreversible) impacts in second half of the 21st century.
When you run your numbers for the cap - and - trade policies, you don't see output reduction as an abatement mechanism being that important, do you?
Compared with the globally efficient policy (with a globally harmonized emissions price at all times), near - term emissions prices in developed countries rise from between a few percent and 100 percent under the different scenarios, and discounted global abatement costs are higher by about 10 to 70 percent.
I don't know, I think tying this to California is the priority in California's policies more renewables or greenhouse gas abatement?
China's climate policy meshes with concerns about energy security, pollution abatement and the cost of energy itself, as well as the impacts of climate change and China's international reputation.
If the SCC can be shown to be negative at current levels of abatement (and bear in mind that your excellent chart of net benefits for various abatement paths refers to benefits relative to the 2010 policy stance) then I'd be content to freeze policy at current levels but to steadily transfer all policies to a carbon tax, or at least to cost them on a common basis, ie to treat renewable subsidies as implicit carbon taxes.
The theory of prices versus quantities for pollution control (Weitzman 1974) shows that such uncertainty will invariably lead the policy to under - or overshoot the optimum: imposing a quantitative target will lead to higher or lower marginal abatement costs than expected, while a given tax rate will lead to greater or lesser abatement effort than expected.
Global emissions abatement by technology and region in the 66 % 2 °C Scenario relative to the New Policies Scenario.
A moderate mitigation policy targeting emissions from both the agricultural and land - use change sectors with a carbon price of US$ 10 per tCO2e could lead to an abatement of 3,223 MtCO2e ⋅ y − 1.
The Secretariat's 2.5 GtCO2 estimate of the abatement effort implied by the Chinese pledge is calculated relative to a constructed reference case (not the IEA WEO2009) that explicitly excludes the effort associated with China's existing energy intensity policy.
The Secretariats 2.5 GtCO2 estimate of the abatement effort implied by the Chinese pledge is calculated relative to a constructed reference case (not the IEA WEO2009) that explicitly excludes the effort associated with China's existing energy intensity policy.
With two policy tools (abatement and SGE), the regulators can choose the policy portfolio that maximizes net benefits, taking into account both the advantages and disadvantages of SGE.
Importantly, though SGE plays a substantial role in optimal climate policy, abatement plays a vital role as well because SGE is an imperfect substitute for abatement.
Ellerman, A.D. and A. Decaux (1998), Analysis of Post-Kyoto CO2 Emissions Trading Using Marginal Abatement Curves, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report No. 40, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Methane experts and policy - makers from around the world are meeting to discuss options for methane reduction and abatement activities at the Global Methane Forum from 16 - 18 April 2018 in Toronto, Canada.
Policy A has a small investment in abatement of CO2 emissions.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z