Fama and French attribute the variation in average returns between high and low BM stocks to «relative distress,» arguing that value strategies (i.e. high BM stocks) produce
abnormal returns because they are fundamentally riskier.
Not exact matches
Apparently a lot of
Abnormal Returns readers want to become hedge fund managers
because Ted Seides» So You Want to Start a Hedge Fund: Lessons for Managers and Allocators did well.
Because technical analysis uses price and volume information, all three levels of efficiency state that an investor would be unable to earn an
abnormal return with this information.
The paper is a response to Fama and French's 1992 paper, The Cross-Section of Expected Stock
Returns, which argued that value strategies produce abnormal returns only because they are fundamentally r
Returns, which argued that value strategies produce
abnormal returns only because they are fundamentally r
returns only
because they are fundamentally riskier.
I don't do them not
because they are not valuable, but
because others do them better then me, like
Abnormal Returns.