We must either
abolish our law societies, or change their management structure so that they do have a permanent civil service — only one for all societies in Canada.
The best thing for all of us and all victims of the problem would be to
abolish law societies.
Abolish law societies or force them to change because you don't want to serve out the rest of your legal career in a severely financially - depressed legal profession.
So: threaten law societies that if they don't get competent to solve the problem of unaffordable legal services, then we must petition government to
abolish law societies which would be the best thing that could be done for the population, the justice system, and the legal profession itself.
Not exact matches
But despite the real gains in social morality that came in the wake of the abolition of the slave trade, despite the rise in the status of women, despite the benefits that came from the enactment of child - labor
laws and the establishment of the welfare state, did not the nineteenth century also bequeath to us those proposed «solutions» to social ills that led to mass starvation in Russia and China, to the utopian nightmares of communism and fascism, to wars unending, and ¯ in those
societies that actually managed to
abolish most social evils ¯ to a hedonism that is undermining
society from within?
In terms of societal values and tort
law, it's interesting that states had
abolished those torts while most people in
society still claim that marriage and family is important and should be protected.
It provides a solution to the unaffordable legal services problem in Canada («the problem»), so as to: (1) maintain
law society management structures as they are; (2) fulfilling their duties in
law to make legal services adequately available; and thus, (3)
law societies can avoid being
abolished.
Treasurer of the
Law Society of Upper Canada Paul Schabas even joked with me about my last column — which was extremely gracious of him, as I had been more than a little pointed in my criticism of the LSUC's recommendation (since reversed) to
abolish the Legal Practice Program.
So, change the structure of
law society management, or
abolish them.
The
Law Society of Upper Canada is looking at options to address the increasing shortage of articling placements, including
abolishing the articling requirement.
Law societies are fated to either be: (1)
abolished because of their refusal to try to solve the problem of affordability; or, (2) greatly diminished in purpose, power, and prestige by the commercial production legal services.
Therefore,
law societies must either be
abolished and their regulatory powers transferred to an agency that is more responsive to the democratic process, or change their management structures.
As long as benchers do nothing to resolve that conflict of interest,
law societies have to be
abolished and replaced with permanent institutions that are much more responsive to public need and to the political system that makes possible our
law - based democracy.