He said there seems to be a «paranoia that
abortion license is being restrained or setback,» which he believes — much to his chagrin — is not the case.
Privacy is a porous legal concept with an uneven history ranging from Justice Brandeis's 1890 definition of «the right to be left alone» to the so - called constitutional right of privacy delineated by William O. Douglas and used by William J. Brennan to support
the abortion license in Roe v. Wade.
The abortion license is continuing to gnaw at the conscience of our nation, as the....
The battle cry is this war was notoriously formulated by Justice Kennedy in the Casey decision upholding
the abortion license in America: «At the heart of liberty is the right to define one's own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life.»
She assumes that
the abortion license is guaranteed by the Constitution, and it therefore follows that anybody who does not affirm that license is «obeying» some authority other than the Constitution.
Notable defenders of
the abortion license, such as Naomi Wolf, have conceded that abortion is no ordinary surgical procedure....
The sexual revolution and the associated
abortion license were immeasurably facilitated by a culture now preoccupied with what Mary Ann Glendon has famously termed «rights talk.»
In addition, some changes, such as
the abortion license, are not so set in concrete as Fukuyama suggests.
Now it is about the proper roles of men and women, same - sex unions and divorce and having children and a host of other questions once thought not to be political, and all of them somehow entangled with and ever returning to the conflict created by the Roe v. Wade discovery in the Constitution of an unlimited
abortion license.
Those who do not accept the regime of the unlimited
abortion license, sexual liberation, divorce, and the wholesale assault on what are called traditional values should simply get lost.
People who say they never go to church backed Gore 61 - 32, as did 70 percent of those who support the unlimited
abortion license and the same percentage of those who identify themselves as gay, lesbian, or bisexual.
«Catholic politicians should build new coalitions in support of protecting innocent human life: Coalitions, first and foremost, with American women» the majority of whom are pro-life» who understand that Roe's
abortion license has encouraged irresponsible male sexual behavior more than any other legal act in our history.
To establish justice and to promote the general welfare, America does not need
the abortion license.
The abortion license has not brought freedom and security to women.
In plain English:
The abortion license saved the taxpayers $ 1.6 billion a year because those terminated before birth were from social classes most likely to be welfare clients.
That a lot of secular progressives are fierce supporters of
the abortion license because they're eugenicists at heart shouldn't come as a surprise; one current member of the Supreme Court, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, had a Gruberian moment some years ago when she admitted in an interview that legal activists promoting
the abortion license prior to 1973 did so in part because they thought it would cut down the «growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of.»
Here's what Dr. Gruber wrote, describing his research into the economic effects of
the abortion license imposed on the United States in the 1973 Supreme Court decision, Roe v. Wade:
The defendant is
the abortion license in America.
In its 1992 Casey decision the Court said that the country faces a «crisis of legitimacy» if the people fail to follow the Court in upholding the present
abortion license.
The answer is that those who support
the abortion license have no choice.
Following on
the abortion license and its declared dominion over life and death, the revolution is entangled today with biomedical activities that constitute nothing less than a return to eugenics (see my article, «The Return of Eugenics,» Commentary, April 1988).
Taranto is taken with what he calls «the Roe effect,» namely, that the people enamored of the unlimited
abortion license are killing off the progeny who might have carried on their cause.
And, of course, that body is relentless in its support for the unlimited
abortion license, including partial - birth abortion.
In upholding
the abortion license in the Casey decision, a plurality opinion of Justices Souter, O'Connor, and Kennedy called upon pro-life Americans to stop their resistance to legalized abortion and accept «a common mandate rooted in the Constitution.»
As we read this history, the furor over stem cells was fueled by numerous factors: the near - universal human desire for magic; patients» desperation in the face of illness and their hope for cures; the belief that biology can now do anything; the reluctance of scientists to accept any limits (particularly moral limits) on their research; the impact of big money from biotech stocks, patents, and federal funding; the willingness of America's elite class to use every means possible to discredit religion in general; and the need to protect the unlimited
abortion license by accepting no protections of unborn human life.
Nor do the editors of America mention that Mrs. Clinton and her allies insist that the unlimited
abortion license, «at home and abroad,» is a nonnegotiable part of their understanding of women's rights.
Mary Ann Glendon has observed that
the abortion license manufactured in Roe and upheld in Planned Parenthood v. Casey is more sweeping than that of any other democratic nation on the face of the earth.
Within days of taking office, he was promoting the compatibility of soldiery and sodomy, and gleefully reversing very modest limitations on
the abortion license - the latter on the very day of the annual pro-life march, and without the slightest acknowledgment that the great majority of Americans have deep moral anxieties about abortion on demand.
That doesn't mean that no one should propose abolishing the EPA, or making large changes to the tax code, or sharply restricting
the abortion license.
He deems unfit to live in his state those who disagree with his fervent, indeed fanatical, embrace of the most extreme form of
the abortion license.
The publicity about, and consequent opposition to, partial - birth abortion rendered a great service in educating the public on how extreme is
the abortion license created by Roe v. Wade.
Just as regularly, federal courts have overruledthe bans, claiming that they transgress against
the abortion license guaranteed by Roe v. Wade.
Further, Gov. Cuomo, along with many others today, do not simply «deal with the law as it is» but energetically work to keep the law as it is with respect to the unlimited
abortion license.
The first faction, those favoring the unlimited
abortion license, is, at least for the moment, politically and legally triumphant.
The two «no compromise» factions in the abortion debate are, on the one hand, the 20 percent who favor the present unlimited
abortion license and, on the other, those who would effect a national prohibition of all abortions, which is also about 20 percent of the population.
It is comparable to the arrogance of the Supreme Court in the 1992 Casey decision, when it declared that not the Court but the character of the nation is being «tested» by whether or not it follows the Court's five - to - four edict in support of
the abortion license.
He cites data showing that support for the unlimited
abortion license imposed by Roe v. Wade is also declining, as more and more Americans identify themselves aspro - life.
Not exact matches
I'm all about Life, and I'm all for
abortions, but what's with the interracial agenda they are pushing with that black dude and the white girl with the red bow in her hair??? does anybody really expect that
license plate to get approved in North Carolina??? come on...
Here, I think, John Paul II's joining of
abortion with the death penalty in Evangelium Vitae is exactly right: A culture that can not bring itself to rescind its
license of murder in the womb is unlikely to understand the proper ways in which justice should be done.
What is to keep states from requiring medical students to learn to perform
abortions as a condition to becoming
licensed to practice medicine, from requiring medical schools to offer training in
abortion, or from requiring public employees to subsidize
abortion through health insurance?
By way of dramatic contrast, it is beyond dispute that an
abortion kills an innocent human being at an early stage ofher development, and it is beyond dispute that Sen. Obama favours an unlimited
license to perpetrate such killings.
By 1973, with the sexual revolution well underway,
licensed doctors were increasingly performing elective
abortions for their patients, but they were worried about criminal and civil liability.
Most orthodox Christians are likely to find it impossible to support a political regime under which the judiciary» without any legislative
license» sanctions
abortion, euthanasia, and homosexual marriage.
Since
abortions will be illegal, the poor will be forced to go to filthy back alleys, where the doctor may be a veterinarian or a «doctor» who has no
license to practice.
States also permit citizens to kill (self - defense,
abortion, euthanasia) without directly
licensing or requiring them to do so.
Already, the conscience division has drawn criticism from civil groups concerned that the protections will be used as a
license to discriminate, particularly against gay or transgender patients, as well as from
abortion rights groups.
Recent developments are not particularly encouraging, as claims to individual autonomy are generally thought to trump the conscientious objections of Christians, Jews, and others who might recoil at, say, funding
abortions or issuing marriage
licenses to same - sex couples.
Their agenda includes electoral reforms like early voting, a strengthening of the state
abortion laws, creation of a single - payer health care system, criminal justice changes like an end to cash bail, passage of the Child Victims Act, enactment of pro-immigration measures like creation of a state DREAM Act and the issuance of drivers»
licenses to undocumented immigrants.
Under the legislation, passed by the Council in March, the centers would have been forced to explicitly advertise that they do not perform
abortions and disclose whether they have a
licensed medical provider on site, provide referrals for prenatal care and
abortions and provide emergency contraception.
One
abortions within the final 24 weeks of pregnancy «to protect a woman's life or health as determined by a
licensed physician» allows too much leeway, he said.