Sentences with phrase «abortion on demand no»

This law has become, in effect, abortion on demand.

I understand that the SNP candidate who won Glasgow East opposes abortion on demand and is extremely uncomfortable with embryo experimentation.

The Republican says he will never sign a law that would expand «abortion on demand through nine months, and potentially performed by non-doctors.»

He says he will «never, ever sign a law» that the GOP candidate says would expand «abortion on demand through nine months, and potentially performed by non-doctors.»

British legislation does not allow for abortion on demand but requires the consent of two doctors.

To the Republican it is about control and restoring America to its Christian foundation, ending abortion on demand, restoring the sancti ty of marriage, reinstating school prayer, seeing that the various citizenry know their place and taking out the garbage.

(Can those who champion abortion on demand worship without contradiction an emblem of fertility?)

In 1962 only 10 per cent of the population supported what is now called «abortion on demand.»

The search for «a middle way» had become «abortion on demand.»

The deconstruction of marriage, abortion on demand, legalization of marijuana, acceptance of pornography, expansion of gambling, provisions for doctor - assisted suicide — progressives either endorse or refuse to speak up against these and other policies and trends.

The bad faith that can infect holders of this position becomes apparent when feminist cries of «femicide» and «previctimization» over the selective destruction of female embryos curiously lapse into silence at the random destruction of embryos (abortion on demand) or at multiple abortions (abortion as a contraceptive).

Would Jesus support abortion on demand?

And, within no time at all, Ireland will have de facto abortion on demand.

As of mid-2013 only thirty - nine percent of those polled supported abortion on demand, indicating little movement since 1983.

Finally, there was Harold O. J. Brown, commenting in Christianity Today:» [Francis] Shaeffer asks whether Evangelicalism can tolerate in its fellowship those who are unwilling to condemn abortion on demand; [likewise] the inerrancy group is asking whether it can tolerate within its leadership those who will not affirm inerrancy» («Assessing the Church of the 1970s: A Decade of Flux?

It was not long, however, before one woman's necessity turned out to be another's convenience, and abortion on demand became the order of the day.

Liberty and Sexuality is his account of how abortion on demand came to enjoy the protection of the United States Constitution and of why Harry Blackmun's rationale for individual autonomy (especially in matters sexual) should be retained and expanded.

More likely than not one of the next few federal elections will strongly favor the Democrats; this will not be a mandate for abortion on demand.

People can recognize that practice of abortion on demand leads to suffering, not just of the fetus but of others too.

The insistence by supporters of abortion on demand that only «wanted children» be allowed to be born has not improved our infant mortality rates, which have remained among the worst in the industrialized world; nor has it helped us cope effectively with the incidence of child abuse, the frequency and severity of which have increased dramatically during this time.

Unfettered access to abortion on demand has addressed none of women's true needs; nor has it brought dignity to women.

Abortion on demand, throughout the full nine months of a pregnancy, for virtually any reason, became public policy in the United States of America.

They are, therefore, understandably distressed that controversy continues to swirl around his determined efforts to explain how he can be both a faithful Roman Catholic and a proponent of abortion on demand.

Using this data, the team found that supporters of abortion on demand had, on average, fewer than two kids for every 2.5 born to parents who favored legal restrictions on abortion.

That one action by Senator Kennedy paved the way for a judicial appointment that almost surely was the key to preserving a constitutional right to abortion on demand and to the overturning of U.S. laws protecting marriage as the union of one man and one woman.

«Federal taxpayer subsidies are helping pay for over 1,000 health plans that cover abortion on demand, and [last week's] Supreme Court decision underscores that only Congress can put a stop to that,» said Carol Tobias, president of National Right to Life Committee (NRLC).

Many Americans refuse to recognize the horror of abortion on demand, many have gotten used to it, and a substantial number support it.

The new order imposed by the Court is abortion on demand.

Economic sanctions on already poor countries may cause as much death and pain as abortion on demand.

More than any other question in public dispute, abortion on demand is the core commitment of the American establishment.

In Abuse of Discretion, the latest book lobbed at the unsteady edifice of Roe v. Wade, Clarke D. Forsythe turns to the Supreme Court justices» private notes and memos from 1971 to 1973 in order to «solve the puzzle» of the court's legalization of abortion on demand.

The reason: «Proponents of abortion rights overcame Americans» qualms about the procedure with a long series of claims about the benefits of unrestricted abortion on demand.

Within days of taking office, he was promoting the compatibility of soldiery and sodomy, and gleefully reversing very modest limitations on the abortion license - the latter on the very day of the annual pro-life march, and without the slightest acknowledgment that the great majority of Americans have deep moral anxieties about abortion on demand.

Thus some advocates of abortion on demand are now admitting that the fetus might very well be more than a part of the body of its mother but, nevertheless, because it is dependent on its mother for its life, she has the right to end that life if it interferes with the exercise of her own personal liberty.

Is it a belief that abortion on demand is a form of legal anarchy which is eroding the moral fabric of Western civilization?

Is it a belief that abortion on demand is a triumph of respect for individual moral autonomy?

Already there is talk of pressure to legalize abortion on demand and euthanasia — always described as voluntary euthanasia, of course.

With each passing day another pro-life public figure» Ted Kennedy, Jesse Jackson, Al Gore, Bill Clinton» evolved to embrace abortion on demand.

Even before Roe v. Wade, he wrote and spoke against abortion on demand and served as president of the National Right to Life Committee.

• The promotion of easy - to - get divorces, abortion on demand, and lesbianism as acceptable lifestyle choices.

As far as I know, he hasn't appealed to any of Jesus» teachings to support his position on embryo destruction, abortion on demand, partial birth abortion, or born - alive abortion.

If this is left to stand, then the government can also FORCE religious schools to no longer teach creationism, government can FORCE religious hospitals to perform abortion on demand, government can FORCE a Catholic DIOCESE to recognize gay marriage, government can FORCE...

One thing making traditionalists of these young Americans, at least according to some of them, is the fact of their having grown up in a world characterized by abortion on demand.

Abortion on demand — abortion at any time, for any reason — unleashes too many toxic results, which too many people know intuitively to be wrong.

Wait a minute... what's wrong with Christians trying to stop the legalization of abortion on demand and same sex marriages?

@Ed, «Wait a minute... what's wrong with Christians trying to stop the legalization of abortion on demand and same sex marriages?»

the person being voted for by these individuals probably does have the right scientific markings like, no God, abortion on demand no matter how late in term, good in business and stealing (er) expropriating for personal gain, cheating on your mate, etc, etc. 2nd.

If he would denounce his positions on gay marriage and abortion on demand it would help though.

Can we support a man who support abortions on demand?

We take God out of the courts out of schools we allow abortions on demand without a single question.