Male and female bodies being forced to provide contraception and
abortion pills against their religious convictions, females (Sebelius) rules
All because they were forcing a moral company to contribute to
an abortion pill against their will.
Not exact matches
Whether we like it or not, this argument is very attractive to parents, even to those who are instinctively
against abortion and the morning - after
pill.
A federal judge denied Hobby Lobby's request for an injunction
against the Affordable Care Act's (ACA) contraceptive mandate on Monday, ruling that the arts - and - crafts giant must cover emergency contraceptives in its insurance policies even though it believes the
pills cause
abortions.
Many of the people from these same institutions advocate
against abortion, but pretend not to understand the realistic benefit of the morning after
pill or even basic contraception; their unrealistic wishful thinking is causing the death of many at the hands of disease.
But I would like to add that many of the reasons an «unwanted» pregnancy happens in the first place is due in large part to the same people who are
against anything resembling
abortion... like opposing birth control
pills, opposing any form of birth control at all for that matter, opposing s - ex education, and so on.
If you believe that fooling a woman's system to avoid pregnancy is
against your moral code then fine, we'll agree to disagree on the evils of foiling God's plan for every coupling to produce a child, but to claim the
pill is
abortion is just sad.