Abortion Policy in the United States,» analyzed statements about embryological and fetal development from information booklets produced by 23 states that require informed consent.
Not exact matches
She also discussed some of the women's health and family
policies that she would prioritize
in the White House, such as paid family leave and access to birth control and safe
abortion.
In 1971, a year after the Women's Strike for Equality March — during which 50,000 women marched down New York City's Fifth Avenue demanding changes to childcare and
abortion policies — Congress passed a resolution designating Aug. 26 as Women's Equality Day.
In 2005, he used the first
policy convention of the then - new Conservative Party to take potentially divisive social - conservative issues like
abortion off the party's agenda.
Harper told Southam News
in 2001 that he leaned toward a pro-life stance, and added that he supported the Alliance's
policy of dealing with moral issues such as
abortion and capital punishment through citizen - initiated referendums.
Speaking to the High River Times
in April 2015, Mr. Fraser was quoted as saying «I will emphasize the Pro-Life values of Albertans, making constituents and other candidates aware of the issues surrounding
abortion and how they are directly relevant to provincial
policy... We should de-fund
abortion and fund the life affirming alternatives of crisis pregnancy support, parental support, and adoption.»
New Democrats feel their best shot at re-election cuts a straight path through Kenney's social values,
policies and past comments against same - sex marriage and
abortion, as well as his more recent comments that parents ought to be informed that their kids are
in school gay - straight alliances.
It turns God into a pawn
in our political chess games, brazenly enlisting God's support for our particular
policies on tax rates or
abortion or the war
in Afghanistan.
It seems to make more sense for Republicans to focus
policy proposals on parental rights and restrictions on late - term
abortion while noting that - whatever their ultimate beliefs - some
abortion restrictions are very unlikely to happen
in any foreseeable future while third trimester
abortion on - demand is a reality.
Pro-lifers get formal
policy maximalism
in the Republican platform, while Republican presidential candidates spend the general election talking about
abortion as little as possible.
The by - now predictable story lines have to do with the bishops» alleged interference
in public
policy (usually related to
abortion) or with the Vatican's alleged suppression of deviant theologians.
The outstanding example, of course, is the Chinese government's long - running «one - child
policy,» replete with forced
abortions, public trackings of menstrual cycles, family flight, increased female infanticide, sterilization, and other assaults too numerous even to begin cataloguing here —
in fact, so numerous that they are now widely, if often grudgingly, acknowledged as wrongs even by international human - rights bureaucracies.
In 1992 the members of Valley Hospital Association (VHA), a private secular organization made up of residents of Mat - su Borough, adopted a policy prohibiting abortions in its hospital except in cases of pregnancy resulting from rape or incest, or where the life of the mother is threatened, or because «the fetus has a condition that is incompatible with life.&raqu
In 1992 the members of Valley Hospital Association (VHA), a private secular organization made up of residents of Mat - su Borough, adopted a
policy prohibiting
abortions in its hospital except in cases of pregnancy resulting from rape or incest, or where the life of the mother is threatened, or because «the fetus has a condition that is incompatible with life.&raqu
in its hospital except
in cases of pregnancy resulting from rape or incest, or where the life of the mother is threatened, or because «the fetus has a condition that is incompatible with life.&raqu
in cases of pregnancy resulting from rape or incest, or where the life of the mother is threatened, or because «the fetus has a condition that is incompatible with life.»
Conservatives are deeply aggrieved by Supreme Court decisions
in the past 30 years that have struck down laws against
abortion, laws on homosexuality and certain laws and
policies promoting religion
in the public square.
So even though I think
abortion is morally wrong
in most cases, and support more legal restrictions around it, I often vote for pro-choice candidates when I think their
policies will do the most to address the health and economic concerns that drive women to get
abortions in the first place.
In this important work, Duddington takes consideration of a number of key ethical issues that face our contemporary
policy and law - makers, including marriage,
abortion, euthanasia, reproductive science, and religious conscience and freedoms.
We can think of
abortion acting as a type of insurance
policy for teenage sexual activity
in the same way that a car insurance
policy covers theft etc..
By focusing exclusively on the legal components of
abortion while simultaneously opposing these family - friendly social
policies, the Republican Party has managed to hold pro-life voters hostage with the promise of outlawing
abortion, (which has yet to happen under any Republican administrations since Roe v. Wade), while actively working against the very
policies that would lead to a significant reduction
in unwanted pregnancies.
Some youngsters would never dream of having an
abortion in any case and would not be affected by any
policy change.
But has there ever been a more wicked
policy, with more disastrous social consequences, than the «one - child
policy» China began to implement
in the early 1980s — a state - decreed population - control measure that resulted
in, among other horrors, untold tens of millions of coerced
abortions?
A federal judge denied Hobby Lobby's request for an injunction against the Affordable Care Act's (ACA) contraceptive mandate on Monday, ruling that the arts - and - crafts giant must cover emergency contraceptives
in its insurance
policies even though it believes the pills cause
abortions.
So the «pro-lifers» are against
abortion as a legally medical form of «murder», but then vote for politicians
in our USA who promote war and all kinds of both domestic and foreign
policies that lead to the death of millions of already born humans.
Take the 1
in 3 Campaign, for example, whose mission is to «start a new conversation about
abortion» and to «create a more enabling cultural environment for the
policy and legal work of the
abortion rights movement.»
Yet they seem quite happy to profit off of stuff made
in China, a country that has for years had a
policy of forced
abortions...
First of all,
in their attitudes toward legalized
abortion, beliefs about
abortion, and
policy preferences pertaining to
abortion, the members of those two groups, not surprisingly, are almost as different as they possibly could be.
Mohr, James C.
Abortion in America: The Origins and Evolution of National
Policy, 1800 - 1900.
In view of these realities, one hopes that more politicians will emerge who have the wit to recognize the political advantage in advocating more protective abortion policie
In view of these realities, one hopes that more politicians will emerge who have the wit to recognize the political advantage
in advocating more protective abortion policie
in advocating more protective
abortion policies.
This is precisely why
abortion advocates expend such vast efforts at international meetings pushing for
abortion policies that do
in fact seek to subvert the democratic process by foisting an a priori
abortion agenda on nations around the world.
While the Justice made clear his own preference for pro-life public
policies, he argued that
in itself democracy is neutral as between competing positions on issues such as
abortion and euthanasia.
Ms. Benshoof claims that the CRLP's attempts to enforce «customary international law» are consistent with the American legal system and that,
in any event, UN «created norms respect the
abortion policy of individual states.
While the report contained (as a nod to official, if aging, EU
policy) a single, laconic line stating that «
in no case must
abortion be promoted as a family planning method,» (Item 31) it is hard to square this with the predominant language.
The report shows a sort of tortured desire for some kind of good, some kind of affirmation of human dignity: Wonderfully, it calls on Member States to «implement
policies and measures aimed at preventing people from having
abortions for social or economic reasons and providing support to mothers and couples
in difficulty.»
Churches on the left and right often see themselves
in opposition to the dominant culture — whether they are opposing
abortion rights on one side or opposing U.S. foreign
policy on the other.
As a result of that commitment, he is prepared to move «
in a train of moderate steps» until
policy reaches that point where an absolute prohibition on all
abortions, beginning at the moment of conception, is
in place.
Bork surveys a long and depressing series of decisions - on free speech, pornography, contraception,
abortion, sexual equality, etc. -
in which the Supreme Court, claiming the authority of the Constitution, has taken public
policy out of the hands of the people and their elected representatives.
As I said
in my own piece, people of my persuasion would do handstands if we could enact Wilson's
policy today and have the law restrict
abortions beyond eight to ten weeks.
Abortion on demand, throughout the full nine months of a pregnancy, for virtually any reason, became public
policy in the United States of America.
The better comparison would be the death penalty and a state mandated
abortion policy like
in China.
In December 2007, when Belmont Abbey College discovered coverage for abortion, contraception and sterilization tucked away in their employee health - insurance policy, they did what any Catholic college would - well, ought to - do, they had that coverage remove
In December 2007, when Belmont Abbey College discovered coverage for
abortion, contraception and sterilization tucked away
in their employee health - insurance policy, they did what any Catholic college would - well, ought to - do, they had that coverage remove
in their employee health - insurance
policy, they did what any Catholic college would - well, ought to - do, they had that coverage removed.
Are you all willing to go to war with the Chinese that have a one child per family to control the over population
in the world and use
abortion to control their
policy?
BRC, I do understand fully, what I think you don't understand by having that clause
in their employees insurance
policy, they feel that they are aiding a person to get contraceptives or an
abortion which to them is the same thing as going against their beliefs.
Under his preferred settlement, national public
policy would allow
abortion only
in cases of imminent danger to the life of the mother, conception by rape or incest, and a few other extraordinary instances.
For example the Indian woman that was allowed to die
in Ireland because the hospital was afraid to give a theraputic
abortion against what the religious
policy teaches.
In Beyond the Abortion Wars: A Way Forward for a New Generation (Eerdmans), Camosy takes stock of the polling data and concludes that abortion policy could comfortably shift in a restrictive directio
In Beyond the
Abortion Wars: A Way Forward for a New Generation (Eerdmans), Camosy takes stock of the polling data and concludes that abortion policy could comfortably shift in a restrictive di
Abortion Wars: A Way Forward for a New Generation (Eerdmans), Camosy takes stock of the polling data and concludes that
abortion policy could comfortably shift in a restrictive di
abortion policy could comfortably shift
in a restrictive directio
in a restrictive direction.
More than 200
abortion restrictions have been enacted
in 30 states since 2011, compared with 212 between 2001 and 2010, said Elizabeth Nash,
policy analyst with the Guttmacher Institute, to USA Today.
Perusing the index of Origins, the weekly publication of representative documents and speeches compiled by Catholic News Service, our imaginary historian will note, for example, the following initiatives undertaken at the national, diocesan and parish levels
in 1994 - 95: providing alternatives to
abortion; staffing adoption agencies; conducting adult education courses; addressing African American Catholics» pastoral needs; funding programs to prevent alcohol abuse; implementing a new
policy on altar servers and guidelines for the Anointing of the Sick; lobbying for arms control; eliminating asbestos
in public housing; supporting the activities of the Association of Catholic Colleges and Universities (227 strong); challenging atheism
in American society; establishing base communities (also known as small faith communities); providing aid to war victims
in Bosnia; conducting Catholic research
in bioethics; publicizing the new Catechism of the Catholic Church; battling child abuse; strengthening the relationship between church and labor unions; and deepening the structures and expressions of collegiality
in the local and diocesan church.
It is for this reason that SPUC has launched The Mayisha Campaign (Mayisha meaning Life
in Swahili) to raise awareness about maternal mortality, dispel the myths put about by
abortion groups and lobby the Department for International Development to adopt an ethical foreign
policy which respects the lives of both mothers and their babies.
The rule — first implemented by President Reagan at a 1984 conference
in Mexico City — prohibits international family planning organizations from receiving federal funds unless they agree not to perform or counsel for
abortions or lobby
in order to liberalize the pro-life
policies of foreign governments.
Acting the day after the 44th anniversary of the US Supreme Court's legalization of
abortion, Trump signed an order restoring what is known as the Mexico City
Policy, which President Barack Obama had rescinded three days after he was inaugurated
in 2009.
They are so wedded to this connection that when President Trump reinstated the Mexico City
Policy, which denies American aid to any NGO that provides, counsels, or refers for
abortion, or that promotes a change
in a country's laws towards permitting access to
abortion, not a single NGO (as far as I am aware) agreed to sever its contraception work from its
abortion advocacy.