But none of the questions surround the horrific global
abortion rate of one out of every four pregnancies.
Last month, The Lancet journal revealed the latest results from a study on abortion trends calling for a new response to the stagnant or increasing
abortion rates of the developing...
Last month, The Lancet journal revealed the latest results from a study on abortion trends calling for a new response to the stagnant or increasing
abortion rates of the developing world.
Not exact matches
In countries where
abortions are legal - and even free — the
rate of abortions are much lower.
Well, if you look at the statistical analysis, you will find that as
abortion became legal and safe, the
rate of violent crime has dropped in this country — significantly and with a high correlation to access to safe and legal
abortions.
Even the vaunted right to
abortion, both claimed and exercised at extraordinary
rates, did not seem to mitigate the misery
of millions
of these women after the sexual revolution.
Additional reasons might be given for The United Methodist Church to rid itself
of a commitment to
abortion rights: the increasing numbers
of African delegates (who are, in the main, pro-life) to General Conference; the horrifyingly high
abortion rates (though the annual totals are continuing to decrease) in the United States; the pro-life drift
of American public opinion (which United Methodism seems to follow); the uncommon clarity
of ecumenical teaching on the dignity
of the human person; and the providence
of God.
Proponents
of contraception, on the other hand, predicted in the late 60s that widespread contraceptive use would decrease divorce
rates, increase marital satisfaction, lower unwanted pregnancies and
abortions.
A 2005 study by Gregory S. Paul published in the Journal
of Religion and Society stated that, «In general, higher
rates of belief in and worship
of a creator correlate with higher
rates of homicide, juvenile and early adult mortality, STD infection
rates, teen pregnancy, and
abortion in the prosperous democracies,» and «In all secular developing democracies, a centuries long - term trend has seen homicide
rates drop to historical lows» with the exceptions being the United States (with a high religiosity level) and «theistic» Portugal.
Contraception is the promise
of child - free sex, and when something goes wrong and a child is conceived ¯ due either to the technical failure
rate of contraception or to the possibility
of human error in anything we humans undertake ¯
abortion takes that child - free promissory note to the bank.
For example, countries in the Caribbean currently own the highest
abortion rates (65 per 1,000 women
of reproductive age).
o Conclusion # 1: The failures
of the widely used birth «control» methods i.e. the pill and male condom have led to the large
rate of abortions (one million / yr - CDC data) and S - TDs (19 million cases / yr - CDC data) in the USA.
So as this study reveals that the legal status
of abortion plays a statistically non existent role in affecting
abortion rates, we will need to rethink those energies.
If you think these ideas are outdated or irrelevant, I suggest you take a look at the damage that has been wrought on society by rampant divorce,
abortion, our
of wedlock pregnancy, falling birth
rates, and a general view that life is NOT sacred, family is NOT important, and that children are more a burden to be avoided than anything.
One
of the first things you notice is that global
abortion rates vary widely.
In Sweden, for example, an increase in affordable access to contraception and the presence
of free contraceptive counseling have paralleled a substantial increase in the teen
abortion rate.
Lancet researchers looked at the legal status
of abortion and found that it didn't correlate with lower
abortion rates.
- Risk to a woman's health
of childbirth (during first trimester,
abortions have a death
rate that is more than five times lower than the risk
of death to mothers from childbirth.)
Most
of the countries where
abortion is illegal also suffer from widespread poverty and limited access to contraception — huge drivers in the
abortion rate.
Recent data published by The Lancet journal shows that countries where
abortion is illegal or heavily restricted — mainly in Africa and Latin America — don't have lower
abortion rates than the rest
of the world.
This is largely due to the efforts
of the American economist Steven D. Levitt, who claimed, in Freakonomics [1], that the legalisation
of abortion has led to a reduction in American crime
rates.
The research evidence on this question is hard to deny and right in line with the predictions
of the economic models: prohibition
of secret
abortions cuts both teenage
abortion rates and teenage pregnancy
rates.
Better still would be to offer confidential
abortion to two similar groups
of people, then remove confidentiality from one
of those groups and then assess the relative change in pregnancy
rates in the between the two groups.
To date, only two research papers in refereed academic journals have investigated the impact
of confidentiality / no confidentiality on
abortion or pregnancy
rates.
The bottom
of the graph indicates what has happened to conception (
abortion and birth)
rates to under 16s over this time.
This is very important because, although the remit
of the Teenage Pregnancy Unit is to cut pregnancy
rates, one
of its main policy recommendations that it emphasises year after year is to provide youngsters with easier and better access to confidential
abortion.
So, with those considerations in mind, I think it's safer to say that while legal restrictions on
abortion might put a dent in the
abortion rate, they won't put an end to
abortion as we know it, and, most importantly, they won't do a thing to alter the number
of unwanted pregnancies.
To date, over sixteen studies have looked at this issue and the impact on
abortion, birth or pregnancy
rates, the best
of which is probably a study by economist Philip Levine [2].
Our research is backed up by all the other academic papers which examine the impact
of easier access to EBC on unwanted pregnancy or
abortion rates.
They say further that even if one does not equate a fetus with a child, as long as one attributes some value to the fetus» and they demonstrate how economists routinely make such outrageous calculations in insurance claims for loss
of body parts» and put the value as low as one hundredth
of a human being, the lowered crime
rate would not come near justifying the number
of abortions.
Some
of these youngsters will get pregnant when they would not have done otherwise and the overall teenage pregnancy (births and
abortions combined)
rate is likely to increase.
The failures
of the widely used birth «control» methods i.e. the Pill and male condom have led to the large
rate of abortions (one million / yr) and S - TDs (19 million / yr) in the USA.
A couple
of research papers indicated only a decrease in
abortion rates that is statistically insignificant (i.e. it could have been due to chance rather than the change in the law), but these have tended to analyse data on
abortion rates for all ages, not specifically teenage
abortion rates.
But Clinton is far better positioned to keep the
abortion rate at the record low it saw under President Obama while the Republican Party works for the next four years to produce the kind
of candidate the people
of this country deserve.
Perhaps the most effective measure that British Government could use to help achieve its target
of cutting teenage pregnancy
rates is to introduce a rule giving prohibiting confidential
abortions for minors, such that parents would have to be informed or, better still, would have to consent to their youngsters having an
abortion.
Even Anna Glazier, a health expert and a strong proponent
of greater access to the morning - after pill, stated in early 2006 in an editorial in the British Medical Journal that greater access to emergency birth control has failed to cut pregnancy and
abortion rates.
Furthermore, as I became more involved in the feminist conversation (some feminists are pro-life,
of course, but many are pro-choice), I began to understand some
of the arguments against the criminalization
of abortion, like that banning
abortion does not necessarily reduce the
abortion rate, that enforcing a ban on all
abortions would be impossible, and that women would likely seek out
abortions through unsafe, illegal procedures anyway.
Yes, and there are 300 million citizens in the US and they can't stop from shooting each other and putting each other behind bars, and ruining the world banking system with dubious methods and instruments and wreck people's retirement savings all over the world, not to mention the high
abortion rate, murder
rate and consumption
of resources
rate... It's just a disorganized disaster, as opposed to the Nazi's who had an organized disaster.
His presidency did not make much
of a dent in the
abortion rate, and even though he appointed conservative judges, Roe vs. Wade remained intact.
By the time W finished his second term, I had graduated from college, come to terms with the fact that the criminalization
of abortion is highly unlikely no matter the party in power, expanded my definition
of «pro-life» to include Iraqi children and prisoners
of war, and experienced first - hand some
of the major problems with America's healthcare system, which along with poverty and education issues, contributes to the troubling
abortion rate in the U.S. I remained pro-life idealistically, but for the first time, voted for a pro-choice president, hoping that the reforms I wanted to see in the healthcare, the economy, immigration, education, and for the socioeconomically disadvantaged would function pragmatically to reduce
abortions.
Let's face it: We are unlikely to find a single party that truly represents a «culture
of life,» and
abortion will probably never be made illegal, so we'll have to go about it the old fashioned way, working through the diverse channels
of the Kingdom to adopt and support responsible adoption, welcome single moms into our homes and churches, reach out to the lonely and disenfranchised, address the socioeconomic issues involved, and engage in some difficult conversations about the many factors that contribute to the
abortion rate in this country, (especially birth control).
In a chapter dedicated to the work
of the Life charity, studies on the link between
abortion and breast cancer are discussed, as are findings that show
rates of suicide and binge drinking are higher among women who have had
abortions.
Somewhat dubious, I searched for the data, which reveals the pro-lifer was right on the facts but offering an unsupported interpretation: The study showed that the maternal mortality
rate declined after
abortion was prohibited in 1989, but that it had already been declining for more than a decade, probably as a result
of rising levels
of women's education.
The number
of abortions had by believers and the
rate at which believers have
abortions should significantly less than for godless, immoral non-believers!
The
rate of abortion of babies in the womb detected with Down's syndrome is expected to rise with the introduction
of the test.
Leaving aside the issue
of whether or not EBC may act in an abortifacient way in some cases, every single such study has found that schemes promoting EBC simply do not reduce observed
rates of unwanted pregnancies or
abortions.
This is an interesting statistic to discuss, but to claim (as the pro-lifer did) the outlawing
of abortion lowered maternal mortality
rates is incorrect.
(The failures
of the widely used birth «control» methods i.e. the Pill and male condom have led to the large
rate of abortions (one million / yr) and S - TDs (19 million / yr) in the USA.
With typical use
rates like that, even if the girl was only coming to Planned Parenthood for a prescription, it was a certainty that some
of her classmates who came for contraception would find themselves considering whether to return for an
abortion.
Majority
of University professors are atheist Majority
of scientists are atheists Poverty
rate is lower among atheists IQ
rates are higher among atheists Illiteracy
rates are lower among atheists Average Income
rates are higher among atheists Divorce
rates are lower among atheists Teen pregnancy
rates are lower among atheists STD Infection
rates are lower among atheists
Abortion rates are lower among atheists Crime
rates are lower among atheists Homicide
rates are lower among atheists Please tell me... who is really blessed????????