Washington, DC — New research from the Texas Policy Evaluation Project (TxPEP) demonstrates that health centers in Texas are already struggling to meet increased demand for safe, legal abortion following a wave of closures after the passage of
abortion restrictions in 2013.
Well of COURSE the GOP platform includes full - throated support for some of the most dangerous
abortion restrictions in the country.
In addition to passing one of the most extreme
abortion restrictions in the nation, years of hostile policies in Texas have left tens of thousands of Texas women without access to cancer screenings, birth control, HIV tests and other preventive care (read more HERE from the Guttmacher Institute).
In the landmark Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt case on June 27, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that two
abortion restrictions in Texas are unconstitutional because they would shut down most clinics in the state and cause an «undue burden» for Texas women to access safe, legal abortion.
States have enacted 51 new
abortion restrictions in the first six months of 2015 — despite the fact that Americans overwhelmingly support access to abortion.
The politicians behind this bill claim
the abortion restrictions in the bill are intended to improve women's health.
«There's already numerous
abortion restrictions in place, as well as logistical issues around being able to get into the one clinic in Mississippi, as well as the limitations placed on that clinic on to what point can they provide abortion services,» Nash said.
States across the country have moved toward similar
abortion restrictions in recent years, with Texas upholding its own «fetal pain» law despite state senator Wendy Davis's filibuster making national news in 2013.
The Afton, Minnesota, resident penned a scathing response to two anti-abortion letters published in the Minneapolis Star Tribune following the Supreme Court ruling on June 27 striking down
abortion restrictions in Texas.
Not exact matches
Perhaps the most politically volatile coming Supreme Court case is Whole Woman's Health v. Lakey, which will decide whether dozens of
abortion clinics throughout Texas can remain open — a decision that probably will affect other conservative states that have
in recent years imposed harsh
restrictions on
abortion clinics.
He's never really tried to sell himself as a family man
in the traditional sense and wears the hypocrisy of his political commitment to
abortion restrictions and abstinence - only sex education very lightly.
It seems to make more sense for Republicans to focus policy proposals on parental rights and
restrictions on late - term
abortion while noting that - whatever their ultimate beliefs - some
abortion restrictions are very unlikely to happen
in any foreseeable future while third trimester
abortion on - demand is a reality.
And Family Research Council President Tony Perkins says the last time his conservative Christian movement saw so many victories at the state level — where many legislatures are busy passing new
abortion restrictions - was
in 2004, when more than a dozen states adopted same - sex marriage bans.
In addition, some surveys show that here in the U.S., states with more abortion restrictions do in fact have lower abortion rates, suggesting legal changes may indeed have some effec
In addition, some surveys show that here
in the U.S., states with more abortion restrictions do in fact have lower abortion rates, suggesting legal changes may indeed have some effec
in the U.S., states with more
abortion restrictions do
in fact have lower abortion rates, suggesting legal changes may indeed have some effec
in fact have lower
abortion rates, suggesting legal changes may indeed have some effect.
So even though I think
abortion is morally wrong
in most cases, and support more legal
restrictions around it, I often vote for pro-choice candidates when I think their policies will do the most to address the health and economic concerns that drive women to get
abortions in the first place.
Ireland's
abortion laws are the strictest
in Europe, but the Irish government may be about to address the previously unapproachable: whether to loosen
restrictions on ending a pregnancy.
So, with those considerations
in mind, I think it's safer to say that while legal
restrictions on
abortion might put a dent
in the
abortion rate, they won't put an end to
abortion as we know it, and, most importantly, they won't do a thing to alter the number of unwanted pregnancies.
Canada has a much lower
abortion rate with a higher atheist / agnostic rate than the US (and there are NO
restrictions on
abortion in Canada).
If you're on the left, you might insert «
abortion» and use that logic to help argue against any and all
restrictions and regulations — even
in the wake of Kermit Gosnell and StemExpress and 926,190
abortions in 2014 (and 1,608,600
in 1990, and 1,497,670
in 1979, and on and on, up to 60 million since Roe).
Meanwhile, reports show the number of
restrictions adopted throughout the country against
abortion during the year are far more than
in any previous year.
Earlier this month, the Texas legislature approved a loudly - debated package of
restrictions on
abortions in the Lone Star State; among other things, requiring
abortion clinics to bring their facilities
in line with surgical standards and banning
abortions after 20 weeks.
Since the decision of the Supreme Court of Canada
in R. v. Morgentaler (1988) holding even relatively minor criminal code
restrictions on
abortion contrary to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (on similar» and similarly spurious» grounds as those of the U.S. Supreme Court
in Roe v. Wade), Canada has been without
restrictions on
abortion.
If majority opinion
in the legislature favors some
restrictions upon
abortion, and there is no specific language
in the Constitution on the subject, then «pro-choice» forces have to invoke something very much like a natural law duty to get their way.
In Lader's mind there was a very definite connection between the struggle to abolish slavery in the 19th century and the struggle to abolish legal restrictions on access to abortion in the 20t
In Lader's mind there was a very definite connection between the struggle to abolish slavery
in the 19th century and the struggle to abolish legal restrictions on access to abortion in the 20t
in the 19th century and the struggle to abolish legal
restrictions on access to
abortion in the 20t
in the 20th.
Yet another example is that of nonviolent protestors at
abortion clinics who defy unjust
restrictions of their freedom of speech
in order to plead the case for the unborn to women contemplating
abortion.
Despite having a higher proportion of atheists and agnostics (and no
restrictions on
abortion unlike the US), the
abortion rate is MUCH LOWER
in Canada.
In Guttmacher's analysis, they found that the decline of
abortions is because of the availability of effective, affordable birth control and the
abortion restrictions that have limited women's access.
A similar invasion of civil rights is implicit
in the initiative to require doctors to report to the Department of Health persons infected with the AIDS virus, and
in the proposed
restrictions that would prohibit any family planning institution receiving federal funds from informing clients of the availability of
abortion services.
When the president signed into law a budget bill that included $ 385 million for family planning overseas, he accepted a
restriction that no more than $ 15 million could go to organizations that perform or promote
abortion in foreign countries even if he waived the limitation.
In the past three years, states passed 205 restrictions on abortion — more than what passed in the entire previous decad
In the past three years, states passed 205
restrictions on
abortion — more than what passed
in the entire previous decad
in the entire previous decade.
More than 200
abortion restrictions have been enacted
in 30 states since 2011, compared with 212 between 2001 and 2010, said Elizabeth Nash, policy analyst with the Guttmacher Institute, to USA Today.
The incremental approach to stopping
abortion has been effective: 231
abortion restrictions were enacted
in 27 states from 2011 to 2014, according to the Guttmacher Institute.
To put recent trends
in even sharper relief, 205
abortion restrictions were enacted over the past three years (2011 — 2013), but just 189 were enacted during the entire previous decade (2001 — 2010).
«
Abortion restrictions and clinic closures mean that patients may need to travel greater distances to access services,» said Rachel Jones, lead author of the study,
in a written release.
This makes 2013 second only to 2011
in the number of new
abortion restrictions enacted
in a single year.
State lawmakers passed the second - highest number of
abortion restrictions ever this past year, with 19 states enacting 43 measures
in 2012 that limited access to
abortion services, according to the Guttmacher Institute.
The Florida state legislature — at least the key committees controlled by Democrats — refused
in a special session called by the governor to consider
abortion restrictions.
And when it comes to immunizing such «choices» from legal
restriction or even private remonstration, the Court's liberals can be counted upon to flip on the switch of what Justice Antonin Scalia, writing
in dissent, describes as «the ad hoc nullification machine that [is] set
in motion to push aside whatever doctrines of constitutional law stand
in the way of the highly favored practice of
abortion.»
A former aide to Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonTrump Jr. met with Gulf adviser who offered help to win election: report Voters Dems need aren't impressed by anti-waterboarding showboating After year of investigation, Trump can rightly claim some vindication MORE criticized Sen. Kirsten GillibrandKirsten Elizabeth GillibrandOvernight Health Care — Sponsored by PCMA — Trump hits federally funded clinics with new
abortion restrictions Dem senators ask drug companies to list prices
in ads Gillibrand to publish children's book about suffragists MORE on Thursday after the New York Democrat became the first of many senators to join a successful push to force the resignation of Sen. Al FrankenAlan (Al) Stuart Franken100 days after House passage, Gillibrand calls on Senate to act on sexual harassment reform Eric Schneiderman and #MeToo pose challenges for both parties Senate confirms Trump judicial pick over objections of home - state senator MORE (D - Minn.).
The dynamics of this stage of the conversations could be promising: Carper is acting as a go - between to centrists such as Sens. Snowe, Landrieu, Nelson and Lieberman, while Schumer is
in constant contact with liberals like Sen. Sherrod BrownSherrod Campbell BrownHillicon Valley: Facebook, Google struggle to block terrorist content Cambridge Analytica declares bankruptcy
in US Company exposed phone location data Apple starts paying back taxes to Ireland Overnight Health Care — Sponsored by PCMA — Trump hits federally funded clinics with new
abortion restrictions Senate Dems call for probe into why Trump has not issued Russia sanctions MORE (D - Ohio).
«I think we understand some things happened that should not have happened,» said Senate Democratic Whip Dick DurbinRichard (Dick) Joseph DurbinOvernight Health Care — Sponsored by PCMA — Trump hits federally funded clinics with new
abortion restrictions Dem lawmaker spars with own party over prison reform Dem senators ask drug companies to list prices
in ads MORE (Ill.).
and Sherrod BrownSherrod Campbell BrownHillicon Valley: Facebook, Google struggle to block terrorist content Cambridge Analytica declares bankruptcy
in US Company exposed phone location data Apple starts paying back taxes to Ireland Overnight Health Care — Sponsored by PCMA — Trump hits federally funded clinics with new
abortion restrictions Senate Dems call for probe into why Trump has not issued Russia sanctions MORE (Ohio).
Laws governing
abortion in America have changed over time, from no laws
in Colonial days — when it was considered a medical issue — to the various state
restrictions seen today.
«I'm very concerned about the strength and aggressiveness of you two pushing back,» said Sen. Sherrod BrownSherrod Campbell BrownHillicon Valley: Facebook, Google struggle to block terrorist content Cambridge Analytica declares bankruptcy
in US Company exposed phone location data Apple starts paying back taxes to Ireland Overnight Health Care — Sponsored by PCMA — Trump hits federally funded clinics with new
abortion restrictions Senate Dems call for probe into why Trump has not issued Russia sanctions MORE (Ohio), the panel's ranking Democrat.
3)
In the late 1960s and early 1970s, most U.S. states loosened
restrictions on
abortion.
In 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that all of the U.S. states had unconstitutional
restrictions on
abortion — despite the U.S. Constitution being silent on the subject.
«This ruling, the most significant
abortion decision
in a generation, puts states on notice that they can not adopt
restrictions that unduly burden or deny a woman's constitutional right to an
abortion.»
Sen. Sherrod BrownSherrod Campbell BrownHillicon Valley: Facebook, Google struggle to block terrorist content Cambridge Analytica declares bankruptcy
in US Company exposed phone location data Apple starts paying back taxes to Ireland Overnight Health Care — Sponsored by PCMA — Trump hits federally funded clinics with new
abortion restrictions Senate Dems call for probe into why Trump has not issued Russia sanctions MORE (D - Ohio): Brown, 64, was on Clinton's running mate shortlist.
And as both federal and state legislators grapple with increased
restrictions on
abortion, a new national poll indicates Americans have mixed reactions to some of the moves being made right now
in state houses and the nation's capital.
A GOP candidate running against Sen. Kirsten GillibrandKirsten Elizabeth GillibrandOvernight Health Care — Sponsored by PCMA — Trump hits federally funded clinics with new
abortion restrictions Dem senators ask drug companies to list prices
in ads Gillibrand to publish children's book about suffragists MORE on Sunday sharply criticized the New York Democrat.