There is an anti-harassment provision in the legislation that allows staff of
abortion services providers to have a safe access zone of up to 150 metres around their homes, anywhere in Ontario.
A coalition of
abortion service providers and pro-choice organizations, including West Coast LEAF, intervened to support the legislation.
Not exact matches
According to the ethics report, physicians objecting to
abortion or contraception must refer patients desiring such
services to other
providers (recommendation # 4); may not argue or advocate their views on these matters though they are required to provide prior notice to their patients of their moral commitments (recommendation # 3); and, in emergency cases or in situations that might negatively affect patient physical or mental health, they must actually provide contraception and / or perform
abortions (recommendation # 5, emphasis added).
There are links to other «helpful» websites such as the BPAS (British Pregnancy Advisory
Service — which describes itself as «the leading
provider of
abortion services in the UK»), Childline (which advises a girl named Chantelle, aged 14, that if she is afraid that she might be pregnant she can still prevent pregnancy by using emergency contraception up to three days after intercourse),)
A recent law prohibits federal funds from paying for most
abortions, but Planned Parenthood — which, among other
services, is a major
abortion provider (3 percent of their
services are
abortions)-- has received hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funding — legally, much of that can not be used on
abortions.
HHS positioned the shift as part of its «major actions to protect conscience rights and life,» including a new proposed rule to better enforce 25 federal protections for health care
providers who decline to perform
abortions and other
services, as well as yesterday's announcement of a new division dedicated to fielding such complaints.
It recommended that the state clarify «the responsibilities of public health
service providers,» which read in light the Committee's long - standing disgust at conscientious objection to
abortion means something like «force your doctors to perform and refer for
abortions.»
In the January 2006 edition he examines a piece written by Ann Furedi, the director of the UK's principle
abortion provider the, partly Government funded, BPAS (British Pregnancy Advisory
Service).
being the largest
provider of
abortion services outside the NHS, performing over a third of all procedures in England and Wales each year.
But some worry that Price's appointment bodes ill for public health programs, pointing to his deep opposition to the ACA and his record of votes to defund women's health
provider Planned Parenthood, much of whose clientele is poor, and 3 % of whose
services consist of providing
abortions.
These regulations may prohibit qualified
providers from performing
abortions, misinform women of the risks of the procedures they are considering, or require medically unnecessary
services and delay care, the report says.
These bills provide a roadmap for state policymakers seeking to fight government interference within the patient -
provider relationship, promote women - centered approaches in the provision of
abortion and other reproductive health care
services, and enact legislation that emphasizes the need to expand access to
abortion.
These
services are funded by donations, not the taxes that are spent on Planned Parenthood, an
abortion provider.
Following a decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit that allowed the immediate enforcement of a state law blocking women from getting
services from one - third of
abortion providers in the state, reproductive health care
providers have taken their case to the U.S. Supreme Court.
This policy requires doctors who object to providing medical care on the basis of religious or conscientious grounds (such as medical assistance in dying,
abortion, birth control and gender confirmation surgery) to connect the patient with a person or agency who will either provide care or connect the patient with a willing
provider of the
service requested.
This policy requires doctors who object to providing medical care on the basis of religious or conscientious grounds (such as medical assistance in dying — «MAID» — but also
abortion, birth control and gender confirmation surgery) to connect the patient with a person or agency who will either provide care or connect the patient with a willing
provider of the
service requested.
Just in the last two months, Arizona has taken two CAP bills all the way to the Supreme Court, where they were refused review: HB 2036, the 20 - week
abortion ban, and HB 2800, which attempted to deny women with Medicaid coverage the right to access health care
services at a
provider of their choosing.
Interventions are needed to expand access to
abortion services through better equipping existing facilities, ensuring adequate and continuous supplies of medication
abortion drugs, and by increasing the number of trained
providers.
Conservative policymakers have sought to undermine these protections, most notably by trying to deny Medicaid reimbursement for family planning and related
services to Planned Parenthood health centers and other
providers that either offer
abortion - related
services or are affiliated with a
provider that does so.10
Proponents of such restrictions are ultimately seeking to make
abortion inaccessible for U.S. women, and so are seeking to shutter Planned Parenthood health centers and any safety - net health center providing publicly funded family planning
services that additionally offers
abortions (using other funds), or is affiliated with an
abortion provider.
First, the state moved to ban Planned Parenthood health centers from participating in the Women's Health Program, based solely on the fact that these centers were associated with other sites where
abortions were provided; Planned Parenthood health centers had been serving about four in 10 women in the program statewide, and some sites served as many as eight in 10 women within their
service areas.22 The Obama administration made clear that Texas» action violated federal law by discriminating against qualified
providers.
If your local Planned Parenthood doesn't have the
abortion service you need, we can refer you to other health care
providers in your area that can help.
Policymakers are now targeting Planned Parenthood Arizona and other
abortion providers in the state with a bill (HB2284) that would allow unannounced inspections of health centers by the Department of Health
Services.
In 2012, conservative state officials sought to punish
abortion provider Planned Parenthood (despite the fact that PP keeps its
abortion services wholly separate from other
services) by excluding PP from the joint federal - state program.
Planned Parenthood had served Shelby County, Tennessee's Title X clients for 30 years, but in 2011 the county decided to give the contract to Christ Community Health
Services, a religious organization that will not provide
abortions or contraception, and will not refer patients to any
provider who will offer
abortions.
Those regulations will affect more than women's access to early
abortion care, because most
abortion care
providers offer a full array of safe, affordable, preventive health
services, including breast and cervical cancer screening, STD prevention and treatments, and birth control.
On April 11, Texas Planned Parenthood family planning
providers who do not perform
abortions filed suit against the Texas Health and Human
Services Commission (HHSC) in federal court in order to protect Texan women's access to basic, preventive health s
Services Commission (HHSC) in federal court in order to protect Texan women's access to basic, preventive health
servicesservices.
The North Carolina provision requires
abortion providers who believe that a woman might be the victim of domestic violence to provide her with information about available social
services.
As the nation's leading women's health care
provider and advocate, Planned Parenthood knows firsthand why it's so critical that everyone have access to a comprehensive range of reproductive health care
services, including
abortion.
PPGMR is the leading
provider of comprehensive reproductive health
services, including family planning
services, STD and HIV testing and prevention counseling, cancer screenings, pregnancy testing and options counseling, as well as safe and confidential
abortion services.
In response to a pair of related inquiries made last year by Deuell and HHSC Commissioner Tom Suehs, Attorney General Greg Abbott opined that the state could keep Planned Parenthood from providing any WHP
services — by blocking Medicaid funds for any health care
provider that's «affiliated» with an
abortion care
provider, even if it doesn't provide
abortion services itself (see «Women's Health: Ideology First!
Providers that offer
abortion services or are affiliated with a
provider that does so would be ineligible, as would any entity that makes
abortion referrals — a direct violation of the federal regulations governing the Title X program, which require Title X — funded sites to offer nondirective pregnancy - options counseling and referral.
Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood Great Plains (PPGP) and Reproductive Health
Services of Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region (PPSLR) celebrate today's federal court opinion, which blocks medically unnecessary restrictions against
abortion providers in Missouri.
Call us for a referral list of health care
providers in your area that offer other
abortion services.
This health center does not have a
provider available to offer
abortion services.
Kansas City, MO — Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood Great Plains (PPGP) and Reproductive Health
Services of Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region (PPSLR) celebrate today's federal court opinion, which blocks medically unnecessary restrictions against
abortion providers in Missouri.
«Planned Parenthood is the nation's largest and most trusted voluntary
provider of reproductive health
services because we provide our patients with unbiased, medically accurate information about the full range of pregnancy options: parenting, adoption and
abortion — as well as access to birth control to prevent future unintended pregnancies,» added Foster.
Call us for a referral list of health care
providers in your area that offer
abortion services.
Then, as now, some of the biggest
providers of reproductive healthcare around the world — groups such as the International Planned Parenthood Federation and Marie Stopes International — decided to forego U.S. funding rather than limit the
services they provide and risk exposing more women to unsafe
abortions.
In 2000, PPWP entered into discussions with Women's Health
Services, the only non-profit
abortion provider in Pittsburgh.
By using a ridiculously broad definition of «
abortion services» that includes referral, HBs 2010 and 2011 may cut access to health care at
providers throughout the state.
Yet, in spite of these alarming statistics around cancer and STDs in New Jersey, on Monday Kim Guadagno stated that she would not restore funding for preventive reproductive health
services — because
providers like Planned Parenthood also offer
abortion services.
It also prohibits state funding of any
abortion provider for preventive health care
services like cancer screening, contraception
services and STD testing and treatment.
By using a ridiculously broad definition of «
abortion services» that includes referral, the current versions of House Bills 10 and 11 may cut access to health care at
providers throughout the state.
Instead, both states implemented entirely state - funded efforts through which they could exclude Planned Parenthood and other family planning
providers based solely on the fact that they also offer
abortion services.
They provide 59 % of all U.S. abortions2 and focus primarily on
abortion care, and therefore do not typically offer a broad range of reproductive health
services.3 Because specialized
providers are not designed or often seen as sources of comprehensive or ongoing care — whether for contraception or anything else — it can be all the more challenging for them to devote limited resources to offering more integrated care.
The rule tossed out by Trump required state and local governments to distribute federal dollars for family planning
services, including contraception, sexually transmitted diseases, fertility, pregnancy care and breast and cervical cancer screening, to qualified health
providers, irrespective of whether the
providers also performed
abortions.
Moreover, the ever - increasing weight of these restrictions may strain
providers» financial and staffing resources, making it all the more difficult to offer
services other than
abortion.
Because of an increasingly restrictive legal environment and clinic closures across the country,
abortion patients are facing new barriers to care, including the need to travel greater distances to access
services.2, 20 Overcoming these challenges can be difficult or impossible, especially given that 75 % of
abortion patients are low - income, and 59 % have already had a child and may have other family obligations.21 Whether a
provider offers same - day contraceptive
services is irrelevant if a patient can not access
abortion care in the first place.
For example, many specialized
providers do not accept insurance; 4 one common reason is that many
abortion patients pay out of pocket because they are unable or unwilling to use their insurance for
abortion care.5, 6 Specialized
providers may also face unique hurdles to the extent that their model of care does not already include clinic - based systems or regular training for offering contraceptive
services.