So while you think that Reverend Wright should get down on his knees and thank God that he is an American, maybe you should learn more
about Biblical Scriptures.
Not exact matches
5:20 - 21 and 1 John 4:1, to not quench the Spirit, to not despise prophecies, but to examine all extrabiblical revelations according to
biblical criteria and test all persons, like the noble Bereans in Acts 17, who «examined the
Scriptures daily to see if this were so,» the Calvinists / MacArthurites deleted my post of my testimony on SO4J's FB timeline — because it threatened them, and they knew I am telling the truth
about an awesome dream of Jesus in 1973, as I emerged from a traumatic childhood with a mother who had worked the Ouija board when I was 11.
Its not
about biblical idolotry its whether we believe that
scripture is simply a suggestion, a guide or the revealed word of God.
The fact that people are tempted to abuse
Scripture by calling upon it to support whatever they believe is one of the reasons it is inappropriate most of the time to think that the primary theological debate is
about whether the
biblical text is authoritative or not.
This is a problem that can be corrected by those evangelical process theologians who are genuinely immersed in
scripture rather than distinguishing themselves by their objective statements
about biblical authority.
It also led to the ascendance of
biblical criticism (relativizing, to a certain extent, the Holy
Scriptures), which in turn had negative influences on theology, generating a questioning attitude
about the objectivity of established truth and the usefulness of defending ecclesial traditions and institutions.
In the case of King Saul (the
biblical narrative of preference for those on the «less supportive» side of the support - oppose the president spectrum), the
scripture is clear that God wasn't thrilled
about the idea of a monarchy in Israel at all, but did indeed choose Saul to be the man to occupy it (1 Samuel 8:1 - 22).
I myself am inclined to agree with Barr
about the poverty of this postfundamentalist theology and tradition for the future of evangelicalism — though I would want my evangelical colleagues to understand clearly that I reject this tradition not to reject
biblical or evangelical faith but to seek rather a more adequate conceptual framework through which to be more faithful to the
Scriptures.
Years ago, when I began to seriously study
Scripture, I often had questions
about a certain
Biblical passage or theological issue.
A few years ago, in a moment of lonely desperation, I googled something having to do with «Christians against
biblical inerrancy» (for some reason you were on the first or second page of search results...) because I was trying to find out if there was anyone else who was thinking
about the
Scriptures in a different way from what I had encountered.
At the conclusion of his talk
about six
biblical stories of so - called «wealth transfers» in
scripture, Hinn points at the audience and declares «the seventh wealth transfer is coming to you».
Pius XII already commented on the unitive significance of this powerful
biblical expression: «In its natural structure, the conjugal act is a personal action, a simultaneous and immediate cooperation on the part of the husband and wife, which by the very nature of the agents and the proper nature of the act is the expression of the mutual gift which, according to the words of
Scripture, brings
about union «in one flesh»» (Address, October 29, 1951: AAS 3 (1951), 850).
In The Art of
Biblical Narrative, Robert Alter suggests a key to characters» inner thoughts and motivations which would be helpful even to the inexperienced reader of
Scripture: first, external details (appearance, clothing, gestures); second, «one character's comments on another»; third, «direct speech by the character»; fourth, «inward speech... quoted as interior monologue»; and fifth, «statements by the narrator
about the attitudes and intentions of the personages» (pp.116 - 117).
Moreover, by failing to ground their assertions
about scripture in a logically prior doctrine of
biblical inerrancy, the narrative theologians undermine their purported desire to uphold the unity and authority of
scripture.
The purpose of this study is to examine what the
Scriptures say
about biblical, authentic fellowship — and to challenge you to pursue it as a lifestyle.
Before getting into a more detailed analysis of the various
biblical passages involved, Matthew takes Chapter 2 to argue that new information
about sexuality ought to compel Christians to rethink their interpretation of
Scripture.
I think that these
scriptures do clearly portray the
Biblical teaching
about redemption.
Lay leaders responding to these new developments pummel their pastors with questions
about creationism, faith healing and the verbal inspiration of
Scripture, and are overtly suspicious of the historical and critical interpretations of
biblical texts.
Nash, I would be careful
about laughing at someone when you yourself has very little
biblical interpretation of the
scriptures you are posting down.
She did quote some of the
scriptures that required quotations, the rest she stated the part and then paraphrased
biblical scholar
about that section of text.
(and other passages of
Scripture we'd rather not talk
about, A Very «
Biblical Blog Post, and The Problem of Biblicism.)
The Bible is not
about conveying divine principles for starting and managing a Christian business — but is instead
about Christ on the cross triumphing over all principalities and powers and so radically transforming everything we consider to be our business...
Scripture then ceases to
about teaching
about biblical manhood and womanhood or
biblical motherhood and fatherhood — and becomes instead the story of how a covenant - making and promise - keeping God took on full human personhood in Jesus Christ in order to reconcile this alienated and wrecked world to the eternally gracious Father.»
The more I study
Scripture in light of culture and history, the more convinced I become that we today might know less
about God than most of the generations in
Biblical history.
All Year: The Bible (There are many translations available at biblegateway.com)- Anchor Bible Commentary Series - The Women's Bible Commentary, Edited by Carol A. Newsom and Sharon H. Ringe - Living Judaism: The Guide to Jewish Belief, Tradition, and Practice by Wayne D. Dosick - Women in
Scripture: A Dictionary of Named and Unnamed Women in the Hebrew Bible, the Apocryphal / Deuterocanonical books, and the New Testament, Edited by Carol Meyers, Toni Cravien, and Ross Shepard Kraemer - Recovering
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, Edited by John Piper and Wayne Grudem - Discovering
Biblical Equality: Complementarity Without Hierarchy, Edited by Ronald W. Pierce, Rebecca Merrill Groothuis and Gordon D. Fee - Women in the World of the Earliest Christians: Illuminating Ancient Ways of Life by Lynn Cohick - God's Word to Women by Katharine C. Bushnell - Don't Know Much
About the Bible: Everything You Need to Know
About the Good Book but Never Learned by Kenneth C. Davis - «On The Dignity and Vocation of Women» by Pope John Paul II - The Year of Living Biblically by A.J. Jacobs
However, by the end of these posts you will hopefully understand why I believe what I believe
about biblical illiteracy and why I still think I should be writing and teaching
about Scripture and theology on this website and through my podcast.
About Blog
Biblical Theology Today is a ministry helping Christian understand the Christocentric unity of all the
Scriptures.
A faith - based family comedy for folks who don't mind having a familiar
Biblical scripture overhauled into a contemporary allegory
about saving the environment.
About Blog
Biblical Theology Today is a ministry helping Christian understand the Christocentric unity of all the
Scriptures.
About Blog
Biblical Theology Today is a ministry helping Christian understand the Christocentric unity of all the
Scriptures.