Numerous questions about the impact of the new law remain but on the opt - out issue it appears that Congress will require states to notify parents
about the Common Core Testing scheme but will continue to require that states mandate that 95 % of students participate in the destructive tests — «or else.»
As one Seattle elementary teacher wrote
about Common Core testing this year,
For the truth
about the Common Core Testing system one need only go back to a 2011 article in the Washington Post in which James Harvey, the executive director of the National Superintendents Roundtable, explains what the NAEP proficient level really means.
Every Connecticut school administrator is well aware, or should be well aware, that in January 2013 Governor Dannel Malloy's first Commissioner of Education, Stefan Pryor, provided local school officials with a directive explaining how to mislead parents
about the Common Core testing and how to make it as difficult as possible for parents to opt their child out of the testing frenzy.
If you know of any situation in which state or local officials are engaged in efforts to bully, harass or mislead parents or students about their opt - out rights or are threatening teachers that they may not provide parents and students with accurate information
about the Common Core testing, please get in contact immediately.
Please Note: This blog post has been corrected and updated to reflect that the article in the New Canaan Advertiser was a straight news story concerning the Superintendent's statement
about the Common Core Testing Program.
Hundreds of teachers and parents from across western New York got their chance to address concerns
about Common Core testing standards with New York State Education Commissioner John King.
(To read more
about the Common Core tests and how they are different from previous state tests, click here.)
* Clarification: This story has been updated to attribute concerns
about the Common Core tests to teachers and include Carol Burris's new role at the Network for Public Education.
Not exact matches
Assemblyman Jim Tedisco (R,C,I - Glenville), Assemblyman Al Graf (R,C,I - Holbrook) and Assemblyman Ed Ra (R - Franklin Square) today called on the Assembly Majority to get serious
about the impending
Common Core standardized
testing crisis in our schools and convene a special session before the first round of
tests begin on April 14th to ensure parents know
about their rights to have their children refuse the
tests.
There are interesting stories
about Common Core and standardized
testing all over the country, but if you want real entertainment, you have to look closely at Florida.
At a time when the corporate education reformers like Governor Cuomo scapegoat teachers, underfund public schools, and push high - stakes
testing linked to
Common Core as way to justify the expansion of privately - managed charter schools, she has persistently brought forth real facts
about how poverty, segregation, and inequitable school funding affect
testing and achievement in public schools.
One in five parents opted their children out of the
tests in 2016 amid complaints
about the rigorous
Common Core standards they measure and debate over the
tests» usefulness and role in teacher and school ratings.
New leaders of the state Board of Regents are scheduled to be elected Monday, then hold a news conference where they likely will face questions
about their future plans for
Common Core academic standards, student
testing and teacher evaluations.
«Our members are very knowledgable
about education issues, and while there is great concern
about the implementation of the
Common Core and the over-reliance on
testing, there are many other issues that are front - burner for NYSUT members,» he said, listing concerns over the property tax cap, equitable school funding, the teacher evaluation system and the statewide expansion of pre-kindergarten.
Thousands of frustrated parents and educators from across Long Island were expected to attend a forum in Garden City Tuesday night for an opportunity to speak with New York State Education Commissioner John King
about Common Core curriculum and state
testing.
The union — which has overall questioned the state's
testing under the
Common Core standards — for months has raised concerns
about the state's move toward computerized exams.
Clinton has serious reservations
about how the
Common Core rollout and
testing have happened in New York, even as she supports tough national standards and standardized
tests in general.
That said, there has been an
about 180 - degree
about - face on the governor's part when it comes to the controversial
Common Core curriculum, the opt - out movement and linking
test results to teacher performance evaluations.
Dr. Vanden Wyngaard and district staff will provide an overview of state exams and how the
Common Core Learning Standards are changing instruction for students at all grade levels, as well as information
about how the
tests are used in the new statewide evaluation systems for teachers and principals.
Leadership in both houses of the state Legislature support a two - year moratorium on using
Common Core - aligned
test scores to evaluate teachers and principals or to make decisions
about student placement or promotion, a plan supported by teachers» unions.
And yes, you want your assessments to reflect the standards that you are teaching, but the
Common Core isn't
about testing.
«The
Common Core isn't
about testing, for example.
ALBANY — Gov. Andrew Cuomo said Monday he would consider «legislative changes» to address parents» concerns
about the rigorous
Common Core standards, on which New York schools started
testing some students last April.
State Senator Marc Panepinto and administrators from
about a half - dozen local school districts gathered in Hamburg to discuss
Common Core, standardized
testing and how their tied to teacher evaluations, and how to fix what they collectively believe is a flawed system.
Schools Chancellor Carmen Fariña bragged
about an increase in the number of city kids passing the state
Common Core tests — but that success may have more to do with...
WAMC's David Guistina talks with Judy Patrick of the Daily Gazette
about students who decided to opt - out of the state
common core tests yesterday and a woman who's bringing attention to potholes on the streets of Schenectady in a unique way.
Educators and parents have complained
about secrecy surrounding Albany's
testing program since the first new assessments based on national
Common Core academic standards were administered in spring 2013.
Several teachers attending Monday's event spoke at length
about the impact of
Common Core testing requirements, saying they result in more «teaching to the
test» rather than substantial learning and mastery.
Hawkins» opposition to
Common Core and Race to the Top, as well as his platform to fully fund schools in an equitable manner has caught the attention of teachers and parents around the state who are distressed
about the state of their schools due to high stakes
testing, unworkable and narrow standards and a lack of funding.
As Mr. Hawkins rolled through positions directly affecting public workers, calling
Common Core «a
test - and - punish regime,» responding to a question
about how to pay for the new Tappan Zee Bridge by saying a greater priority should be given to public transportation, and urging the creation of a State Bank to avoid having to go to Wall Street for financing of capital projects, it seemed like he stood for much of what they and their unions would like to see implemented.
This new way of thinking
about summative
testing would retain the advantages of the
Common Core project and the best state
tests while eliminating most of the disadvantages.
About half the
Common Core states will be using
tests developed by Smarter Balanced, and the other half will use
tests from the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC).
New teacher evaluations were rolled out alongside the
Common Core State Standards and related exams, leaving teachers concerned
about how the harder
tests will affect their performance evaluations in the future.
It's a bit hard to say who's a
Common Core state and who's not at this point, but if we take the average score change from 2015 to 2017 in the seven decidedly non-CCSS states in both subjects (Alaska, Indiana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, and Virginia), we see that these states declined by
about 1.4 points on average across
tests.
If the new assessments are to fulfill the promise of the
Common Core,
test designers (and indeed all of us) will have to embrace a different, stronger version of fairness, one that requires us to tell the fuller truth
about where our students stand, and
test the rigorous content that will impart the knowledge and skills to succeed.
As part of the
Common Core State Standards initiative, our state is
about to start using a new set of
tests that are dramatically better, tougher, and fairer than what we've had before.
But not for all the usual reasons that people raise concerns: the worry
about whether we've got good measures of teacher performance, especially for instructors in subjects other than reading and math; the likelihood that tying achievement to evaluations will spur teaching to the
test in ways that warp instruction and curriculum; the futility of trying to «principal - proof» our schools by forcing formulaic, one - size - fits - all evaluation models upon all K — 12 campuses; the terrible timing of introducing new evaluation systems at the same time that educators are working to implement the
Common Core.
Matt Barnum looks at what states are doing
about their exit exams now that they are using
Common Core - aligned
tests, which are harder than the old state
tests they used.
Last week, West and Peterson discussed findings from the survey
about Common Core,
testing and school choice.
In a profession that already feels under siege, the decision in most states — encouraged by the U.S. Department of Education — to press ahead with using student
test scores as a significant component of a teacher's evaluation «just fuels the perception that we care more
about weeding out weak teachers than giving the vast majority of teachers the time and support they need to make a successful transition to
Common Core,» says Schwartz.
Amid way too much talk
about testing and the
Common Core, not enough attention is being paid to what parents will actually learn
about their children's achievement when results are finally released from the recent round of state assessments (most of which assert that they're «aligned» with the
Common Core).
«A lot of this angst is less
about the
Common Core in particular, but [
Common Core] is short hand for
testing, and I think certainly there's an appetite for less
testing.»
Everything I know
about the slow growing, cumulative nature of language proficiency suggests it is all but impossible to
test prep your way to a high score on a third to eighth grade reading
test, especially the more challenging
Common Core tests.
Amid way too much talk
about testing and the
Common Core, not enough attention is being paid to what parents will actually learn
about their children's achievement when results are finally released from the recent round of state assessments.
And in a wonderful and timely bit of irony, the College Board's forthcoming renovation of the SAT
tests — markedly more influential than the AP (and perhaps the
Common Core itself) in shaping what kids have to learn in school if they want to go to a good college — includes enough attention to the seminal documents of American history and the ideas they embody to give pause to Chinese authorities who really don't want their kids learning
about democracy and freedom while preparing to seek entry to a U.S. university.
In an article for The 74, Matt Barnum looks at what states are doing
about their exit exams now that they are using
Common Core - aligned
tests,
But we find little evidence of a public backlash against
Common Core and
test - based accountability, at least on the basis of new information
about local school district rankings.
As Sandi Jacobs, managing director of state policy for the National Council on Teacher Quality, said, «There wasn't enough concern
about how these things [the
Common Core and teacher evaluation] were running down the path together until the
tests became an issue.»
Browse the resources below for more information
about standardized
tests, including new
tests aligned to the
Common Core State Standards.