about Fossil Fuel Industry Paid for Meetings with GOP Attorneys General to Plan Attack on Clean Power Plan
When I wrote
about the fossil fuel industry looking worried, some commenters questioned my focus on divestment.
There seems to be a lack of similar outrage from Eric & Gavin
about the fossil fuel industry working with the American Petroleum Institute to develop a whitelist of approved scientists for media interviews, then giving that list to media executives and having them direct reporters to these sources.
Want to see what Lahsen's 1998 quoted email
about a fossil fuel industry conspiracy looks like today?
So, once again, it is ever more obvious that the collective lot of enviro - activists have only one source for their unsupportable accusation
about a fossil fuel industry denial mating, the worthless set of «reposition global warming» memos, and the one guy responsible for gaining media traction for them, Ross Gelbspan.
A UCS investigation showed that the U.S. news media routinely fail to inform the public
about the fossil fuel industry funders behind climate change contrarian think tanks.
And, one more thing: let's not forget that Matt Pawa, at his former law office's online page collection, had a particular article about Western Fuels suing a number of environmental organizations including Ozone Action, where it quoted David Hunter's desire to one day make a legal argument
about the fossil fuel industry running a misinformation campaign.
In the Q & A session after a 2012 presentation, a question was posed to
him about fossil fuel industry leaders balking at alternative energy sources, and he offered the following at the 42:14 point about wind energy:
Donald Trump has a lot of ideas
about the fossil fuel industry and how he plans to «save» coal from destruction.
Your article fails to educate anyone
about the fossil fuel industry's lavishly funded PR campaigns in the UK and the US to manufacture doubt about genuine science.
However, as a climate scientist I remain much more concerned
about the fossil fuel industry than I am about Arctic methane.
Not exact matches
Environmentalists have raised concerns
about his Cabinet picks for energy and interior secretaries — ex-Texas Gov. Rick Perry and Montana Rep. Ryan Zinke, strong supporters of the
fossil fuel industry.
Bernie Sanders» campaign thinks Clinton owes the Vermont senator an apology for accusing him of «lying»
about how she accepts money from the
fossil fuel industry.
That said, in general - in the United States, at least - the issue isn't so much
about denying global warming as much as it is
about protecting and favoring the major
fossil fuel industries:
But that's irrelevant to the spirit of the question, since (1) Democratic politicians in
fossil fuel states pretty much do the same thing (See West Virginia's Democrat Manchin); and (2) Such behavior is really
industry agnostic, and every politician of every party whose constituents are over-represented in a particular
industry will of course behave the same way
about competing disruptive
industry; and (3) The main opposition is not on alternative energy per se, but on measures to tax / disrupt
fossil fuel one.
From the start, the ethanol
industry has been dogged by concerns
about its net energy balance — whether ethanol requires more
fossil fuel to make than it replaces.
Amalgamated, a left - leaning bank with roots in the labor movement that manages more than $ 40 billion in assets under management, said it would adopt new policies
about lowering its exposure to the
fossil fuel industry in its own investments and its loans.
«These documents are breathtaking, and they reveal what many of us have long suspected: That there is a campaign afoot by groups directly funded by the
fossil fuel industry and right - wing foundations such as Koch
Industries to mislead the public
about climate change,» Pennsylvania State University climatologist Michael Mann wrote in an email to LiveScience.
Senator Jeff Merkley (D — OR) repeatedly questioned Pruitt
about his connections to
fossil fuel industries.
And I will say to the
fossil fuel industries if you're out there, think
about making your mission energy production rather than
fossil fuel extraction and burning.
Everything's Cool (Unrated) Cautionary documentary exposes the efforts of the
fossil fuel industry lobby and conservative think tanks to manufacture an artificial debate
about global warming in the face of irrefutable proof of the phenomenon provided by responsible members of the scientific community.
What is more important is that the
fossil -
fuel industry knew
about the danger in the 1970s, perhaps even the 1960s, and what they did
about it was to fund a massive campaign of denial.
As for The Oil Drum, with all due respect, I have observed that most commenters there are rather myopically focused on
fossil fuels and hold opinions
about solar and wind that seem to be not well informed by knowledge of what is actually happening with those
industries today.
The tobacco analogy works in regard to the
fossil fuel / tobacco
industry positions but that's
about it.
Given the very well established history of lying by omission in
fossil fuel industry propaganda, did they just pick three bodies out of
about 60 or so that happened to have some record of warming, no matter how flimsy that warming record is?
A front - page article and headline on April 24 reported that the Global Climate Coalition, a group that throughout the 1990s represented
industries with profits tied to
fossil fuels, knew
about the scientific consensus that greenhouse gas emissions could cause global warming but ignored it in a lobbying and public relations campaign against efforts to curb emissions.
There is a raging battle today
about the size of
fossil fuel reserves and resources, with «peakists» claiming that we are already at or near peak production of both oil and coal because the amounts of economically recoverable
fuels in the ground are more limited than the
fossil fuel industry has admitted.
«If the world is serious
about achieving the goals agreed in Paris, governments have to stop the expansion of the
fossil fuel industry,» Stephen Kretzmann, Executive Director of Oil Change International, said in a statement.
The genesis of this idea for DOJ to investigate
fossil fuel companies lies in the comparison between the actions of the
fossil fuel industry and the actions of other
industries known to have intentionally misled the public
about the nature of their products, including the tobacco and lead paint
industries.
Is it actually Chevron turning out the «
fossil fuel industry denial light»
about the certainty of man - caused global warming, or is it one solitary unmistakably pro-global warming lawyer nudging an entire company into the most inexplicable kind of politically correct appeasement to enviro - activists?
After all, governments currently spend
about half a trillion dollars a year on subsidies, mostly hidden and economically unsound, for
fossil fuels... yes, our taxes are paying
industries to burn coal and oil.
The grant to Columbia Journalism School was directed at «public interest research into what the
fossil fuel industry understood
about the science of climate change and how they acted given that understanding both internally and regarding the public,» but it did not target Exxon Mobil specifically, Wasserman said.»
My focus is on the accusation that skeptic climate scientists are paid
fossil fuel industry money to lie
about the issue to the public.
The electric utility
industry is the single largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States, accounting for one - third of total US greenhouse gas emissions and
about 40 percent of all carbon pollution from
fossil fuel burning.
Accusations of corrupt
fossil fuel industry influence over skeptic climate scientists are irrelevant material — worthless — in the absence of any physical evidence (full context document scans, undercover video / audio transcripts, leaked emails, money - transfer receipts) proving such skeptics were paid and orchestrated to lie
about the certainty of catastrophic man - caused global warming.
Can you figure out why a PR outfit for the
fossil fuel industry might lie
about the dangerous nature of
fossil fuel, Eric?
Corporate Knights had a chance to sit down with Kortenhorst to talk
about the new RMI - CWR alliance, the rise of the «transactive» grid, the fall of the
fossil fuel industry, and what we can expect to see along the path to December's Paris climate summit.
«We can not continue to allow the
fossil fuel industry or any
industry to treat our atmosphere like an open sewer or mislead the public
about the impact they have on the health of our people and the health of our planet,» Vice President Gore said.
One such tactic [the group will pursue] includes facilitating ongoing and potential joint investigations into whether
fossil fuel companies and
industry groups mislead the public
about the dangers of climate change or the viability of renewable energy resources.
He recounts, for example, a conversation with a top television network editor who was reluctant to run stories
about global warming because a previous story had» triggered a barrage of complaints from the Global Climate Coalition» — a
fossil fuel industry lobbying group...
While much of the opposition came from people who were genuinely (although usually needlessly) concerned
about wind power developments, a great deal also came from people and organisations with financial links to the
fossil fuel industry.
If the GOP tax agenda were remotely serious
about closing loopholes to lower overall rates, the
fossil fuel industry would rightly have a lot to fear.
As ever, the fatal problem with enviro - activists» enslavement to the «reposition global warming as theory» phrase as proof that skeptics are paid illicit money to lie
about certainty of global warming is that there is no evidence of it being a top - down
fossil fuel industry directive of any kind.
In my prior piece
about the spread of Ross Gelbspan's accusation that skeptic climate scientists are paid by the
fossil fuel industry to «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact ``, I barely skimmed the surface of the sheer number of repetitions of it.
The real problem with politics in climate science if the continuing efforts by the
fossil fuel industry, led by ExxonMobil, to distort scientific facts in an effort to deceive the public
about the real extent of the problem.
For comments made on the basis of the
fossil -
fuel industry driven buzz
about the report's eminent release.
«If other G20 governments are serious
about standing up to Trump's climate denial and meeting their commitments under the Paris Agreement, they need to stop propping up the outdated
fossil fuel industry with public money.»
Your ideological biases, or personal gains and reliance on the
fossil fuel industry are obviously clouding your judgment
about some simple facts.
That's when
fossil fuel industry lobbyists and executives started pouring more money into front groups and advocacy campaigns aimed at spreading doubt
about climate science and blocking action to reduce emissions.
Attacks on the credibility of climate science are perpetuated by vested interests, including the
fossil fuel industry, which has pumped millions of dollars into creating uncertainty
about our understanding of climate change.