Sentences with phrase «about joules»

Willis Eschenbach: «So forget about your mechanisms, forget about the joules, forget about the lapse rates and how they are maintained, and just ANSWER THE FREAKIN» QUESTION: Will heat flow in the silver wire forever?»

So forget about your mechanisms, forget about the joules, forget about the lapse rates and how they are maintained, and just ANSWER THE FREAKIN» QUESTION:

If you haven't heard about Joules then just look at those gorgeous spring rain boots below.

Not exact matches

Singer says it could be potentially tapped to drive a tiny electrical generator, although the amount involved — about 10 - 24 joules per cycle — is so tiny that billions of single - ion engines would be needed to generate useful power.

The total energy released must have been about 3 x 1049 joules — an enormous figure compared with the Sun's output of 1026 joules per second, or the output of all the stars of our Galaxy combined, which is 1037 joules per second.

For every 10 joules of energy that our greenhouse gas pollution traps here on Earth, about 9 of them end up in an ocean.

MMBtu: one million Btu's, or British thermal units, a traditional unit of energy equal to about 1,055 joules.

We need to STOP THINKING about calories and joules and all these INVENTED UNITS.

For farrrr too long, these charlatans have abused, misused and misrepresented energy and calories - there is NOTHING AT ALL special about calories, nor intrinsic to food — they could be tossed tomorrow as a Nobel physcist told me in favor of, say, joules..

Well, a quantlet even on it's best day, can only replace about 10 % of the joules or centimeter square that sunlight does.

I specifically wrote about grams, rather than calories, as converting everything ingested in calories is deceitful; as proteins, fats and carbs are also used as buliding material, and calorie counters completly ignore it treating every piece of food as energy: it's like quantifying a wooden house by using joules, while you don't have an intention to burn it.

Today I'm excited to partner with Joules to chat about appreciating the little things through a toddler's eyes.

Joules knows a thing or two about dressing for the English capital, so I picked my favorite trends from their AW15 collection.

They illustrate perfectly what Joules, a long - standing British clothing company, is all about.

Funny thing about water, it ain't land:) about 70 % of the surface radiates at ~ 425Wm - 2 and has to release 334 Joules per gram to become not water:) The other model, about 30 %, has an average surface that radiates at 307 to 316 Wm - 2.

The rate of evaporation at 21 C is about 88 Joules per sec which if that was averaged over a large enough area would be about 88 Wm - 2 per sec.

The top layer grew by about 1.7 x 1023 joules while the entire 0 - 2000 range warmed by about 2.1 x 1023 joules.

That's 14 TW for a year, every year right now — in energy quantities (multiplying by the number of hours or seconds in a year) that comes to about 120,000 TWh (thermal) which is equivalent to 450 x10 ^ 18 joules, or 450 exajoules (EJ) of thermal energy.

The climate models predict that ocean heat content is increasing at about 0.7 × 10 ^ 22 Joules per year.

A 60 - meter ID sphere would store about 10 ^ 9 joules, perhaps a kilowatt day.

So 4.59 x 10 ^ 23 joules is about total energy of atmosphere, but less than this is useful.

I suggest you look at Fig S9 of that paper I see the world oceans heating up about 14 x 10 ^ 22 Joules since 1955.

So all of your claims of deep insights into where the joules are, and all of you talking about some mechanism or other that you are absolutely sure will make the air temperature at the top and bottom different, that has NOTHING TO DO WITH THE PROOF.

Now are you claiming you can take a molecule with a certain kinetic energy (which is what temperature is a measurement of), and raise it 17 kilometers above the Earth (increasing its potential energy by 4664 Joules if we're talking about a mole of N2) without inputting more energy, and have it maintain that same kinetic energy, that same temperature?

You also think that Joules ravings about the gas collapsing to a supercooled liquid is somehow lucent and relevant.

If you want to prove that there is a non-GHG GE involving the dynamic motion of gases, play right on through, but realize that Jelbring's paper isn't about that and is incorrect because it ascribes the same effect to a completely static, completely dry ideal gas that has been left in place, isolated, for a billion years (or as long as equilibrium takes, which won't be anywhere near a billion years at a joule of conductive transport per meter of atmosphere per degree kelvin of temperature difference per 40 seconds).

Given that all Joules are equivalent and all 240 W / m ^ 2 of accumulated forcing from the Sun must on average contribute equally to the emissions of the surface, each W / m ^ 2 contributes about 1.6 W / m ^ 2 to the surface emissions where the next 1.6 W / m ^ 2 of emissions from another W / m ^ 2 of forcing would arise from a surface temperature increase from 288K to 288.3 K.

These days a calorie is taken to be about 4.286 Joules.

That means we need about 10 million acres at Joules» claimed yield per acre to replace all the gasoline.

The freezing releases about 335,000 Joules of heat for each kilogram of water that turns to ice, roughly equivalent to one 60 - watt light bulb burning for an hour and a half (but of course we are talking about lots and lots of kilograms, not just one).

Another estimate using all data except the spurious float data (thick dashed line) suggests much less cooling, only about 25 zeta joules.»

I have no doubt mind you, that the bulk of the TOAenergy imbalance from increases in GH gases can be be found in the ocean at various depths, but what I seriously question is the direction of energy flow in accounting for the accumulation of about 0.5 x 10 ^ 22 joules per year of energy down to 2000 meters, and more when looking at even greater depths.

This assumed people know about watts and joules and heat capacity.

Notwithstanding those who like to count joules in the deep oceans, if that definition is reasonable then what does it say about whether the feedbacks should have (un) equal efficacies?

When you take the surface area of the earth (5.1 × 10 8 km 2), and the amount of energy received from the sun: the result is that each square meter of area facing the Sun receives about 1,380 joules per second (otherwise known as the Solar Constant).

The yield of the Hiroshima atomic bomb was 6.3 x 1013 Joules, hence the rate of global heat accumulation is equivalent to about 4 Hiroshima bomb detonations per second.

I do note from the Nature study «When Mount St Helens erupted in 18 May 1980, it released more than 10 ^ 18 joules of heat at once — about 20 times the total heat flow from all the volcanoes studied in 2001»