Sentences with phrase «about scc»

This all made me a bit curious about the SCC's links.
Taylor, the small church enabler at Small Church Connexion (SCC), a Baptist initiative to assist small churches, says: «In 2004, I went to talk to a big church about SCC.

Not exact matches

About Sports Camps Canada Sports Camps Canada (SCC) was founded in 2015 and is the official operator of Nike Sports Camps in Canada.
About Sports Camps Canada (SCC): Founded in 2015 and is the official operator of Nike Sports Camps in Canada.
About Sports Camps Canada Sports Camps Canada (SCC) was founded in 2015 and is headquartered in Welland, ON.
As required by executive orders and a 2008 court ruling, federal agencies use the SCC to inform regulators about the economic consequences of rules they adopt.
If school districts in Santa Clara County (SCC) really cared about teaching their English Learners (Els) English and keeping them on track for success in college and career, they would jettison the current system of perpetual language immersion and flawed instruction.
Data visualized for the recently completed Santa Clara County Academic Olympics demonstrate that the best SCC districts can do in preparing 11th grade English Learners for success in college English is about one quarter meeting or exceeding ELA standards in 2017, with most school districts in the single digits.
Hope concludes that, if we're in a low - sensitivity world, that would imply an SCC of about $ 65 dollars per ton of CO2.
Nordhaus's preferences for social values and his model of economic growth and climate damages suggests an SCC of about $ 18 per ton of CO2 (for an ECS of 2.9 °C).
Nordhaus's preferences for social values and his model of economic growth and climate damages suggests an SCC of about
-- a study that found low - end climate sensitivity and is frequently cited by climate skeptics — Hope calculates a reduction in the SCC of about 45 % for a low climate sensitivity world.
In sum, it reduces the SCC by about half, but does not push it to zero when everything else is held constant.
Appalachian is currently recovering about $ 135 million in its T - RAC as approved by the SCC in 2014.
• Poles to tropics temperature gradient, average temp of tropics over past 540 Ma; and arguably warming may be net - beneficial overall • Quotes from IPCC AR4 WG1 showing that warming would be beneficial for life, not damaging • Quotes from IPCC AR5 WG3 stating (in effect) that the damage functions used for estimating damages are not supported by evidence • Richard Tol's breakdown of economic impacts of GW by sector • Economic damages of climate change — about the IAMs • McKitrick — Social Cost of Carbon much lower than commonly stated • Bias on impacts of GHG emissions — Figure 1 is a chart showing 15 recent estimates of SCC — Lewis and Curry, 2015, has the lowest uncertainty range.
However, the social cost of carbon (SCC) is higher (by about 15 %) under uncertainty than in the certainty - equivalent case because of asymmetry in the impacts of uncertainty on the damages from climate change.
If I dive right down, they are about the evidence to derive and calibrate the damage function, and the basis for the estimates of SCC for the world.
But Peter, if you consider the SCC's estimates to be a «complete joke» (because of what's happening out there in the real world where the US is responsible for only about 15 percent of GHG emissions), what do you hope to learn from those «who know much more» than you?
But GMT is not climate and does not tell you anything about lots of the assumptions that are erroneously in the SCC speculations (storms, droughts, floods, etc.).
Assessed using the $ 40 per ton central estimate of the SCC, the carbon charge on oil sands crude would be about $ 4 per barrel higher than the carbon charge on average US crude.
But it is still worth thinking about the statements offered to the committee and what SCC calculations tell us about the scale of climate risks.
Even if some lower values of climate sensitivity are acceptable, the SCC remains at just about half of its original value
The tax has been a success on its own terms — fuel consumption is down slightly and the economy is still growing — but a) it only covers about three - quarters of the economy, b) some of the revenue has started to be funneled to specific industries, and c) it remains capped at $ 30, too little to fully capture the SCC or drive a green industrial revolution.
Therein you will find a lot of discussion about discount rates, «leakage», using a U.S. SCC v. a global SCC, average ton of CO2 v. marginal ton, «equilibrium climate sensitivity», and more.
While it is too early to tell, this willingness to hear public comments on the SCC probably originated from the comments received on the Petition to Reconsider the proposed Microwave Oven ruling — the first rulemaking to incorporate the Administration's latest - worst iteration of the SCC (which was about a 50 % increase over its original figure).
[I posted a comment earlier in response to Judith's comment about uncertainty in the SCC but it is held in moderation, so I'll split it in two.
When all these changes were combined, the effect was to reduce the SCC by 97 %, from $ 43 to about $ 1.30.
And police and prosecutors don't ask their sources about the quality of their records management in preparation for making «Stinchcombe disclosure» to the defence; see: R. v. Stinchcombe [1991] CanLII 45 (SCC), [1991] 3 SCR 326; and, R. v. McNeil 2009 SCC 3, [2009] 1 SCR 66.
R v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., 2011 SCC 42 is necessary reading for all Canadian lawyers giving advice about any aspect of private law obligations.
Heck, the newest member of the SCC even wrote about the subject of the SCC, Clements, and «material contribution in the — get this — Supreme Court of Canada Law Review: Russell Brown, «Cause - in - Fact at the Supreme Court of Canada: Developments in Tort Law in 2012 - 2013» (2014), 64 S.C.L.R. (2d) 327.
Then there is «at the time» child Khadr and the decision of the SCC about his status which is an abomination of the first order.
Among the international speakers, SCC Secretary General Annette Magnusson will speak about the future of investment arbitration.
Annette Magnusson, Secretary General SCC, will speak about innovation in practice and share some of the ongoing initiatives by SCC as well as the need for interdisciplinary legal innovation to meet challenges of the future.
To find out more about the Swedish candidacy, contact SCC Legal counsel Nina Berggren, [email protected], or Jakob Ragnwaldh, [email protected], chairperson of the Organizing Committee for ICCA Stockholm 2020.
They also spoke about the work done by the SCC and Sweden's long history of arbitration.
The section features information on the enforcement procedures in various CIS states, a database of court judgements on the enforcements of SCC arbitral awards, e-books about arbitration in Sweden and samples of documents filed in arbitrations under the SCC Rules.
Limiting section 15 claimants to those who are historically disadvantaged would also raise questions about previous cases such as Trociuk v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2003 SCC 34 (CanLII).
As we've previously blogged about, Ontario courts subsequently changed their practices with respect to any cases that entered the system after the SCC's ruling.
For the Supreme Court of Canada, the SCC Rules say nothing regarding citation in the section about books of authorities.
«Quebec (Attorney General) v A — Much Ado About Saying «I do»» - Quebec (Attorney General) v. A, 2013 SCC 5, [2013] 1 SCR 61, by Stephanie Voudouris, The Court
But then they'll slip into the subjective emotional experience of the «target» and talk about «dignity and self worth» (to quote the SCC who made a similar mistake in Taylor).
The SCC essentially launched a grenade into the debate about trial delays and how to fix them.
I disagree with him about the notwithstanding clause — hardly ever used outside Quebec, and I don't think that's a problem; about property rights — an open invitation to fight every kind of government action on the basis that one's property (i.e. right to do whatever one wants without regard to others) has been infringed (the US took over 100 years to fight that one out, and the right to govern is back under attack there); and about secession — in fact the SCC managed to give a reasonable interpretation of the Constitution (not the Charter in particular) on that point.
Constitutional law experts, such as Peter Hogg, speak about the relationship between the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) and Parliament as a «dialogue».
At the launch, SCC Secretary General Annette Magnusson and Martin Borgs emphasised the importance of telling the success stories about international arbitration.
This joint articleby ICC, LCIA and SCC aims to address some of the most commonly asked questions about the sanctions, for example:
One can assume that this week's SCC decision (or telling anecdote) is common knowledge, because Mr. Meehan has gone to the trouble of telling us all about it.
In a panel chaired by Wendy Miles QC, SCC Secretary General Annette Magnusson will share her experiences about new types of claims that are arising in international arbitration, such as human rights - related and climate change - related claims.
Nor am I sure about how copyright law applies to SCC factums, though I suppose that the fair dealing and research exceptions would apply, if courts weren't prepared to find that submitting documents in litigation transferred copyright to the court in question and, hence, the Crown.
Time will tell if the SCC's decision in Hryniak actually brings about the «culture shift» in the civil justice system it seeks to facilitate.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z