Sentences with phrase «about tw»

What do we know about TW Hydrae?

4GET ABOUT JC what about TW.

Not exact matches

TW: How do you feel about all the publicity that followed the Seinfeld episode?

He's fast and with TW all about speed and HB flying down the wing I think it looks good but I would like to see a 442

Another 29 year old player mentioned just madness what about the lad from Everton there striker and why he's at it john stones then give them JC & CC & TW as part X why not.

Just watch the bald tw @t trotting about... wasted a good game... AGAIN.

but what about martinez??? not as expensive as higuain, younger than cavani, and we couldve afforded him etc. wenger's just a bust at the TW.

i honestly think we should loan him out to mid to low table EPL club for one season with the agreement of them playing TW in the first eleven, lets see what he can do with regular start up then we can decide, but i'm sure he has other idea about his carer

How about AS, TW and DB league goals for their last full seasons — both around 0.44 and DB at 0.36 (and 3rd highest ranked PL player in goals per mins).

So the question really is not how much of a tw @t Samir Nasri is, after all he like all footballers are really all about the money and have very short lifespans, but more about the club making a profit on everything it does and NOT wanting to extend its reach too far towards champions league and EPL succsess.

Recent studies of an association of stars called TW Hya have revealed some of the first known isolated giant planet - sized objects in the neighborhood of our own Sun, about 100 light years away.

TW Hydrae is an orange, type K star weighing about 80 percent as much as our Sun.

The planet lies inside a dusty, gaseous disk around a small red dwarf TW Hydrae, which is only about 55 % of the mass of the Sun.

Located about 180 light - years away in the constellation Hydra the Water Snake, TW Hydrae consists of a 10 million - year - old star about four - fifths as massive as the Sun.

TW: Once the past films are done, I really don't think about them anymore.

That is a novel about two children (first), two teens (during) and tw...

Graphics and sound are only slightly improved from the original, so don't expect to be blown away in that regard, however TW: W1 was a very pretty game to begin with, so you got nothing to complain about either.

TW: This exhibition is about great friendships and exchanging ideas.

(As a quick rule of thumb, with today's technology each TW releases about half a gigaton of carbon into the atmosphere each year.)

TW: «Yeah, writing the summary before the report kind of lets the cat out of the bag, doesn't it, about how the conclusions come first, the evidence chosen to fit?»

The geothermal flux through Earth's surface is about 38 TW and it is largely untapped energy except in a few localities where extraction is economical enough to make its use competitive with other forms of energy.

Total power generation is about 16 TW, 16000 gigawatt (thermal, not electric).

For a rough estimate, downwelling water to the deep ocean in convection zones is about 40 Sv (10 ^ 6 m3 / s), assuming that comes in with say 2 deg C, and leaves (through upwelling, isopycnal and diapycnal diffusion), that is a heat flux of 320 TW, thus at least an order of magnitude larger than the geothermal fluxes.

[16] While the meridional overturning circulation (also referred to as the thermohaline circulation) redistributes about 2 PW of heat from the tropics to polar regions, the energy source for this flow is the interior mixing which is comparatively much smaller - about 2 TW.

That's 14 TW for a year, every year right now — in energy quantities (multiplying by the number of hours or seconds in a year) that comes to about 120,000 TWh (thermal) which is equivalent to 450 x10 ^ 18 joules, or 450 exajoules (EJ) of thermal energy.

OLR (Earth's outgoing longwave radiation or infrared output) is about 120,000 TW, see e.g. the top right corner of Figure 7 of http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/cas/papers/KiehlTrenbBAMS97.pdf showing 235 W / m2 of OLR and multiply that by 510 square megameters (area of Earth's surface) to get 235 * 510 = 119850 which rounds to 120,000 TW.

But capital costs are the real show - stoppers: for photovoltaics, at $ 3 / peak watt current prices (solar thermal systems are roughly the same), even in an ideal location, 2000 TWh / yr requires about 1 TW peak capacity, or $ 3 trillion capital investment.

So we can get essentially the same thing by multiplying the solar constant of about 1360 W / m2 by the area of the Earth's cross-section, namely exactly 400 / π square megameters (assuming a perfectly circular cross-section of circumference exactly 40 megameters), and multiply that by 0.7 (taking 0.3 as Earth's albedo) to give the absorbed power as 1360 * 400 * 0.7 / π = 121212 which rounds to 120,000 TW, sufficient precision for your question.

For comparison, geothermal heat, the heat from Earth's hot interior leaking out through the crust, is about 45 TW or three times the direct heating effect of human activities.

Total fossil fuel is close to a million EJ or about 500 years of the long - run thermal energy requirement in the high - growth scenario (at 60 TW (thermal) by 2100), but not including clathrates and oil shale, that is reduced to about 50 years of reserves at the 2100 rate (i.e. we're not even going to make it to 2100).

The net effect is about 7,000 TW, about 600 times our current use.

Wind can generate about 2 TW 3.

1200 TW is about 1 % of the energy flows into the atmosphere when reflected SW and direct radiation from surface to space is subtracted from the incoming radiation.

Geophysicists believe that heat flows from Earth's interior into space at a rate of about 44 × 1012 W (TW).

However about 12W of that 15 TW comes from burning fossil fuels which will one day run out even if CO2 were not an immediate problem.

By way of comparison, the US currently has about 1.2 TW of installed electric generation capacity, so this plan would involve expanding generation capacity fivefold in 35 years.

re my 140 — the power is actually for ~ 999.3 years as I forgot about leap years in that calculation (because I just used the same spreadsheet cell that I used for 2005 — 2007 conversion quad Btu to TW).

This is discussed here, but the calculation is easy — global energy use is about 15 TW, area of the planet is 5.1 × 10 ^ 14 m2, therefore the heat flux is ~ 0.03 W / m2.

It takes about 4800 TW to raise the temperature of the Earth ~ 3 K (these are Chaisson's numbers, Eli is too lazy to calculate his own).

the article is justified, and most of the comments too, there will lag in some degree in any flagship phone, android, windows or iphone, but the article is damn right about SAMSUNG, is 2014 and you can generate lag on almost any samsung TW falgship device.

About Blog A Koala's Playground Blog is about KDrama and TW / C dramas, ratings, reviews and much About Blog A Koala's Playground Blog is about KDrama and TW / C dramas, ratings, reviews and much about KDrama and TW / C dramas, ratings, reviews and much more.

U.S, NL, RO, RU, TW About Blog Avangate makes it easy for digital businesses to expand their market reach.

U.S, NL, RO, RU, TW About Blog Avangate powers modern Digital Commerce, finally solving the complexity of online commerce, subscription billing, and global payments for Software, SaaS and Online Services companies.