Yesterday, I posted
about a court case against the Louisiana SPCA filed by a Bulldog Rescue group for the shelter's refusal to provide information on the dogs they killed.
One man — a lawyer - was there because he'd been invited to speak
about his court cases against the UN.
Not exact matches
You didn't know
about major
court cases regarding your privacy policies
against your company.
The
case against Shrem has been a beacon to bitcoin community businesses warning them
about the significance of regulatory compliance and following the rules of the game, which was also a theme that arose during
court.
In an exclusive interview, Ghanaian investigative journalist Anas Aremeyaw Anas talks to RFI
about the ongoing
court cases against several judges implicated in his undercover sting operation revealing alleged corruption within Ghana's judiciary.
Krueger said legislative leaders still couldn't provide answers
about the future of the state's Tenant Protection Unit, and whether the deal would curb some of office's power to bring
court cases against bad landlords.
The Attorney General's Department has filed a notice at the Supreme
Court to discontinue a
case it filed
about a week ago
against businessman, Alfred Agbesi Woyome, in the controversial GHc51 million judgment debt saga.
Do expect further outbreaks of sledgehammer irony when Tories who have been frothing themselves puce
about the Human Rights Act for years rely on it to plead their
case against retrospective rulings in
court.
Syracuse, NY — The unexpected death of a judge on the state's top
court has delayed the perjury
case against a former Syracuse principal accused of lying
about her role in an illegal time - out room.
After a
court hearing Friday, Dean Skelos spoke
about the
case publicly for the first time, calling the charges — a key piece of Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara's crusade
against Albany corruption — a «prosecution that should never have been brought» and predicting the jury «will find my son and myself innocent.»
He was concerned
about a smelter's putting out sulfur dioxide that was causing respiratory irritation in children, and so, along with the city attorney, he started a
court case against the smelting company, Asarco.
A feel - good legal story
about the U.S. Supreme
Court's squeaker decision on California's anti-gay marriage law, Proposition 8, The
Case Against 8 is a slickly told tale that begs for movie - of - the - week treatment.
Education Next's legal beat columnists Martha Derthick and Josh Dunn wrote
about the
case as it worked its way through lower
courts in Colorado, noting that a state supreme
court ruling against the vouchers on Blaine Amendment grounds could open the way for a challenge to Blaine Amendments before the U.S. Supreme C
court ruling
against the vouchers on Blaine Amendment grounds could open the way for a challenge to Blaine Amendments before the U.S. Supreme
CourtCourt.
A Supreme
Court case from this past spring that many of our members may have heard
about in the national press, Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, would likely have been decided
against unions had Justice Antonin Scalia not died unexpectedly.
The search engine is linking folks to a story I ran in November
about a Tax
Court case where the
Court ruled
against a man who stopped filing tax returns when he turned 72 years old.
And what
about all those
court cases against them?
A judge recently ruled
against the company in one
case, saying Warren «fraudulently induced» the family into a contract, making misrepresentations
about the dog's abilities, which the
court record claimed should instinctively be ready to alert.
In an earlier and separate FOI
case against the BBC, Supreme
Court Judge Neuberger argued the opt - out should be interpreted narrowly - otherwise the BBC could withhold information
about «cleaning the board room floor» using the journalism get - out clause - an absurdity.
http://www.thenewamerican.com & go to 10 July 2012 Sustainable Freedom: Surging Opposition to Agenda 21, «Sustainable Development» There is also an article on the new american site
about the bullying EPA losing a
case, in the supreme
court,
against the sackett family, but I cant put my hand on the reference.
A Berlin
court awarded one person 8,190 euros in 2011 for insults published
against him in social media; in a 2012
case, a trainee who made disparaging remarks
about her boss on Facebook had to pay 2,500 euros in damages.
--
Courts often seal material, both temporarily and permanantly — Persons can apply for pardons, reversing previous convictions — the Supreme
Court recently reversed a contempt conviction
against the CBC, for not removing archival copies of information
about a
case for which a publication ban was ordered.
Very often it is also necessary to represent an inheritor
against the other joint heirs, when they could not find an agreement
about the property; a public auction by
court can be then a solution in those
cases.
For example, an analysis of this concept in the context of random drug testing of students engaged in extracurricular activities where the school's common law authority is balanced
against constitutional concerns
about privacy under the 4th Amendment is found in the U.S. Supreme
Court case Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton, 515 U.S. 646 (1995).
This weird Facebook ownership lawsuit brought by Paul Ceglia has been going on for a while now, but it's noteworthy how many lawyers have taken on the
case and withdrawn — especially given that Facebook is now talking
about bringing actions
against prior attorneys for Ceglia based on failure to report evidence of fraud to the
court.
VANCOUVER — Yesterday, the BC
Court of Appeal (BCCA) released its judgment in a
case about discrimination
against Vancouver's street homeless population.
The
Court released its judgment in Schrenk v BC Human Rights Tribunal, a
case about the scope of human rights protections
against discriminatory harassment in the workplace.
Notable mandates: Represented physicians involved in providing care to Ashley Smith during the 2013 coroner's inquest; acted for Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne in a defamation action
against Ontario Progressive Conservative party leader Tim Hudak and energy critic Lisa MacLeod; in Wise v. Iran, acted for a Canadian victim of a suicide bombing (executed by individuals who received material support from Iran) who sought leave to intervene in ongoing proceedings commenced by United States plaintiffs in the Ontario Superior
Court of Justice seeking orders recognizing the enforceability in Ontario of judgments they obtained from a U.S. court against Iran totaling about $ 370 million; in Khadr v. Edmonton Institution, acted as lead counsel for an intervener, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, to argue that in interpreting Omar Khadr's sentence for the purpose of enforcing it in Canada, Correctional Services Canada was obliged to consider Khadr's right to liberty and principles of fundamental justice; acted for a physician in a malpractice claim in Moore v. Getahun, a precedent - setting case about restrictions on communication between counsel and experts in preparation of expert rep
Court of Justice seeking orders recognizing the enforceability in Ontario of judgments they obtained from a U.S.
court against Iran totaling about $ 370 million; in Khadr v. Edmonton Institution, acted as lead counsel for an intervener, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, to argue that in interpreting Omar Khadr's sentence for the purpose of enforcing it in Canada, Correctional Services Canada was obliged to consider Khadr's right to liberty and principles of fundamental justice; acted for a physician in a malpractice claim in Moore v. Getahun, a precedent - setting case about restrictions on communication between counsel and experts in preparation of expert rep
court against Iran totaling
about $ 370 million; in Khadr v. Edmonton Institution, acted as lead counsel for an intervener, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, to argue that in interpreting Omar Khadr's sentence for the purpose of enforcing it in Canada, Correctional Services Canada was obliged to consider Khadr's right to liberty and principles of fundamental justice; acted for a physician in a malpractice claim in Moore v. Getahun, a precedent - setting
case about restrictions on communication between counsel and experts in preparation of expert reports.
West Coast LEAF will also be intervening at the BC
Court of Appeal in a
case about when and how the governing bodies of healthcare professions can act to protect the public in response to a complaint of sexual misconduct
against a healthcare practitioner.
This past summer the
case against a man accused of using his iPhone to surreptitiously record a family conversation
about his dying mother's will got some attention when the
court dismissed the stepfather - widower's claim for violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act.
However,
about four years ago, the New Mexico Supreme
Court addressed this issue, which has now made it easier to bring dram shop
cases against establishments that over serve alcohol to their customers.
''... the
Court ought to guard
against the pursuit of what have been termed fishing expeditions — speculative quests for information without any real expectation
about the outcome of the quest or its relevance to the
case.»
The Ontario
Court of Appeal has upheld a decision to strike a defamation claim
against a well - known personal injury lawyer in London, Ont., over statements
about a
case against a local obstetrician and gynecologist.
You need to know that as a general principle the loser of a
case may have to pay the winner's costs and so even with a CFA you need to be insured
against the risk of you losing and having to pay your opponent's costs and your own expenses (disbursements) other than our fees e.g.
court fees, expert's fees such as doctors providing medical reports
about you etc..
This
case arrived at the Illinois Appellate
Court as an interlocutory appeal that came
about from the plaintiff Eric Owens's lawsuit
against the defendant hospital, Louis A. Weiss Memorial Hospital, and its doctors related to the care received by Owens at the hospital's emergency room in 2011.
Mr. Azar's pro bono work has also included successfully persuading the Ninth Circuit
Court of Appeals to allow a disabled prisoner's federal civil rights
case to proceed, resulting in a published decision on a matter of first impression; assisting tenants in disputes with their landlords; and assisting a translator in defending
against contempt proceedings relating to her alleged whistleblowing
about safety defects in automobiles.
As reported by Law360, a California state judge recently ruled that Latham & Watkins tentatively was entitled to an award of attorney's fees to the tune of
about $ 1.6 million as damages in a malicious prosecution
case against litigants Messrs. Parrish and Fitzgibbons, in a
case which produced quite a bit of appellate activity (including a published California Supreme
Court decision).
The last thing you want to worry
about is a
court case against you - with Austin renters insurance, you are covered.
Employers should not «let their guard down
about complying with background screening rules» such as the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) despite recent
court rulings such as the dismissal of a proposed FCRA class action lawsuit against transportation network company Lyft, Inc. by a federal judge who cited a decision by the Supreme Court in the case of Spokeo, Inc. v Robins as a reason for the decision, according to an article on the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) web
court rulings such as the dismissal of a proposed FCRA class action lawsuit
against transportation network company Lyft, Inc. by a federal judge who cited a decision by the Supreme
Court in the case of Spokeo, Inc. v Robins as a reason for the decision, according to an article on the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) web
Court in the
case of Spokeo, Inc. v Robins as a reason for the decision, according to an article on the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) website.