Sentences with phrase «about a court case in»

At one recent meeting, there was extensive discussion about a court case in which an industry professional, selling her own condo privately, was found to have misrepresented a special assessment while acting in her professional capacity; property defects or stigmatization; electronic agreements and the purpose of «last to sign» in a real estate offer to purchase.

@Clint Coons wrote a good blog on the topic about a court case in 2009: http://clintcoons.wordpress.com/2009/05/19/tax-court-denies-real-estate-investors-education-expenses/

Not exact matches

In referring to 1964, Abrams is talking about the landmark Sullivan vs. New York Times case, in which the Supreme Court established what's known as the «malice standard» for libeIn referring to 1964, Abrams is talking about the landmark Sullivan vs. New York Times case, in which the Supreme Court established what's known as the «malice standard» for libein which the Supreme Court established what's known as the «malice standard» for libel.

In its court filing on Monday, Waymo said it recently learned that a former Uber security analyst sent a letter to an Uber in - house lawyer more than six months ago, which contained important facts about the casIn its court filing on Monday, Waymo said it recently learned that a former Uber security analyst sent a letter to an Uber in - house lawyer more than six months ago, which contained important facts about the casin - house lawyer more than six months ago, which contained important facts about the case.

In 2005, under very similar circumstances, Sears Canada was found guilty of being too liberal in advertising discounts on car tires and was assessed fines and legal costs of nearly $ 500,000; in fact, the recent court filings about the mattress business specifically mention the old tire casIn 2005, under very similar circumstances, Sears Canada was found guilty of being too liberal in advertising discounts on car tires and was assessed fines and legal costs of nearly $ 500,000; in fact, the recent court filings about the mattress business specifically mention the old tire casin advertising discounts on car tires and was assessed fines and legal costs of nearly $ 500,000; in fact, the recent court filings about the mattress business specifically mention the old tire casin fact, the recent court filings about the mattress business specifically mention the old tire case.

Because the case was tied up in court for years, he said, the narrative from the Democratic side ended up being about how unfair and difficult the law made it for many to vote.

The U.S. has strict laws that punish misrepresenting the truth about people in public forums, but a new case before the Supreme Court could make even presenting innocuous, but mistaken information a punitive offense.

The case and others like it pending in lower courts raise questions about how much companies protect the privacy rights of their customers.

In some cases it has to remove content because of a court order, but in other cases it will remove even relatively inoffensive images and posts — such as pictures of women breast - feeding their children, for example — because it breaches the site's community standards, or because someone complains about the contenIn some cases it has to remove content because of a court order, but in other cases it will remove even relatively inoffensive images and posts — such as pictures of women breast - feeding their children, for example — because it breaches the site's community standards, or because someone complains about the contenin other cases it will remove even relatively inoffensive images and posts — such as pictures of women breast - feeding their children, for example — because it breaches the site's community standards, or because someone complains about the content.

(2) Bringing this case into court for litigation may be unusual but is not surprising; and (3) The concern about political influence in making this decision is an unfortunate cost of candidate and President Trump's disregard for the institutions of justice.

7th US Circuit Court of Appeals nominee Amy Coney Barrett, a Notre Dame law professor, was questioned intensely about her Catholic faith as a result of past writings expressing her beliefs on whether Catholic judges should recuse themselves from death - penalty cases if they believed they would be unable to impartially uphold the law, writing that — in limited situations — judges should step back in cases that conflict with their personal conscience.

Here's something you may not know about court cases: There are often people in the public gallery who are paid to closely watch the members of the jury to see how they react to different witnesses.

Now, documents filed in BNY's case in the past few weeks 2014 the court proceedings begin Monday 2014 provide unprecedented detail about how STARS was crafted at a time when banks and accounting firms were offering deals for multinational corporations to take advantage of loopholes in rules governing foreign tax credits.

But the revelation this week that Mr. Thiel was covertly backing Mr. Bollea's case as well as others has raised a series of new questions about the First Amendment as well as about the role of big money in the court system — specifically the emerging field of litigation finance, in which third parties like hedge funds and investment firms pay for other people's lawsuits.

As ProPublica reported, a 2015 Pentagon report found the military failed to provide key records to the FBI in «about 30 percent of a sample of serious cases handled in military courts.»

Leaked documents about the deal, and a court case in Hong Kong, have shed an unusually harsh light on the usually secretive workings of a major state - owned company.

In Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 98 the Supreme Court formalized this premise into a doctrinal test.The case involved cigarette manufacturing, an industry dominated by six firms.99 Liggett, one of the six, introduced a line of generic cigarettes, which it sold for about 30 % less than the price of branded cigarettes.100 Liggett alleged that when it became clear that its generics were diverting business from branded cigarettes, Brown & Williamson, a competing manufacturer, began selling its own generics at a loss.101 Liggett sued, claiming that Brown & Williamson's tactic was designed to pressure Liggett to raise prices on its generics, thus enabling Brown & Williamson to maintain high profits on branded cigarettes.

In one case, a borrower's testimony about her mental impairment, including evidence that she received Social Security benefits, was enough to convince the court of undue hardship.

When Sheila Hobson — an employee at a Murphy Oil gas station in Calera, Alabama and a party in the upcoming Supreme Court case — realized she was getting ripped off by her employer, she decided to do something about it.

Among the many notable decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court in the area of religion was the 1963 case Abington Township School District v. Schempp, which held that tax - supported schools were only allowed to teach about religion.

I've written elsewhere (and will have more to say soon, since I've got a lecture deadline) about the Supreme Court's quite breathtaking (in a good way) decision in the Arizona tuition tax credit case.

Regardless of points of view, the Wall Street Journal reports that the Justice Department is already «pursuing court orders to force Apple Inc. to help investigators extract data from iPhones in about a dozen undisclosed cases around the country, in disputes similar to the current battle over a terrorist's locked phone...»

Kodie from TLC's «sister wives», the polygamist serial was talking about filing court case for recognition of polygamous marriages coz gay ones are... just wait and see the incesters, pedoists, animalists, everyone will join in

Gorsuch was similarly vague in answering questions about other Supreme Court cases, saying that to discuss his opinion publicly would «be tipping [his] hand.»

The hospital explained in a statement that it is common for cases to be referred to the courts when there are disagreements about what course of action is within the patient's «best interest.»

In the celebrated case New York Times v. Sullivan, the U.S. Supreme Court held «the First Amendment protects the publication of all statements, even false ones, about the conduct of public officials except when statements are made with actual malice (with knowledge that they are false or in reckless disregard of their truth or falsity).&raquIn the celebrated case New York Times v. Sullivan, the U.S. Supreme Court held «the First Amendment protects the publication of all statements, even false ones, about the conduct of public officials except when statements are made with actual malice (with knowledge that they are false or in reckless disregard of their truth or falsity).&raquin reckless disregard of their truth or falsity).»

Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch is in his second day of confirmation hearings and one of today's questions was about landmark Supreme Court case Roe v. Wade.

Once the family broke the gag order and got some national coverage there was huge outcry from first amendment lawyers about the illegality of that order, and also others speaking out about having been legally gagged in court cases with big power differential.

Jurors deliberated for about five hours before announcing the verdict in the case of Brian David Mitchell, 57, court officials said.

A major part of the problem is that though Immanuel Kant wrote about dignity in the 18th century and the word was in use even earlier, strong efforts to elucidate and work with it have not been made (as have been made for, say, the notion of human rights, the subject of innumerable books, essays and court cases).

He spoke about the Burden Sisters inheritance tax case in 2006, in which two cohabiting sisters who had lived together in a loving and committed relationship all their lives lost a lengthy court battle to avoid paying inheritance tax when one of them died.

The document from the Equality and Human Rights Commission follows the European Court of Human Rights judgment in four cases about religious rights in the workplace, one of which found that an employee suffered a breach of her right to religious freedom for being told not to wear a cross at work.

Whatever Marbury was supposed to mean about the scope of the power of judicial review, it is a notable fact that the Court declined to exercise that power to declare another act of Congress to be unconstitutional until 1857, when it ruled in the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford.

In a December 3, 2017 order dismissing the case that is likely to be viewed with some relief by many dairy companies, US district judge Katherine B Forrest agreed with Dannon, noting that a court handling a similar false advertising lawsuit about «non-GMO» claims on dairy products fed GM feed (Gallagher v. Chipotle Mexican Grill) rejected a similar claim at the pleading stage.

In order for Brady to persuade the Supreme Court to hear a case about deflated footballs, he'll have to convince the highest court in the land that his quarrel with the NFL has far - reaching implications for labor law across the countrIn order for Brady to persuade the Supreme Court to hear a case about deflated footballs, he'll have to convince the highest court in the land that his quarrel with the NFL has far - reaching implications for labor law across the couCourt to hear a case about deflated footballs, he'll have to convince the highest court in the land that his quarrel with the NFL has far - reaching implications for labor law across the coucourt in the land that his quarrel with the NFL has far - reaching implications for labor law across the countrin the land that his quarrel with the NFL has far - reaching implications for labor law across the country.

Einhorn has asked those involved in the proceedings not to talk about the case outside of court to protect the child's identity.

LINCOLN PARK — A lawyer for a residents» group fighting construction of a soccer field in Lincoln Park said Latin School and the Chicago Park District had approached them about settling the case before it goes to court.

They summarize news articles, court cases and other resources that help fathers learn more about their rights and responsibilities in the family legal system

Means the Irish courts should use the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights when making decisions about cases in Ireland

Permits the Irish courts to hear arguments about the European Convention on Human Rights in cases before them

An experienced family law attorney can not only answer questions about child custody in your case, but can also be your strongest advocate, both with opposing counsel and the court.

By contrast, I have heard of cases pertaining to some newer member states where the state in question would not even send a representative or written arguments to the court (here again I think it was about prejudicial questions, not infringement proceedings but it shows how specific countries approach EU litigation in general).

In an exclusive interview, Ghanaian investigative journalist Anas Aremeyaw Anas talks to RFI about the ongoing court cases against several judges implicated in his undercover sting operation revealing alleged corruption within Ghana's judiciarIn an exclusive interview, Ghanaian investigative journalist Anas Aremeyaw Anas talks to RFI about the ongoing court cases against several judges implicated in his undercover sting operation revealing alleged corruption within Ghana's judiciarin his undercover sting operation revealing alleged corruption within Ghana's judiciary.

The President of the European Humanist Federation (EHF), David Pollock, said: «The European Court of Human Rights is an essential bastion of equality and non-discrimination but has shown signs of being politically intimidated — for example in the case about the Italian law compelling schools to display crucifixes.

«We are talking about a two - court structure, but we're still trying to figure out a way to balance the role of judges in these cases as well as the district attorneys» role,» he said, adding, «There would be family court for the less serious cases and a youth court for the more serious cases.

There are about 13,000 intellectual property cases a year filed in federal court (many by patent trolls and pornography companies).

The court ordered the applicant to produce more facts about the case in a further affidavit to assist the court in reaching a decision.

Coverage of the phone - hacking allegations has been subdued in the British press due to concerns about prejudicing the trial, but with the case coming before court in front of the international media it is now expected to dominate the front pages once again.

Other examples would include Moos and McClure (where the Court of Appeal overturned the only successful kettling case to date) and the admittedly contentious decision in Abdul v DPP - the conviction under section five of the Public Order Act 1986 of those protesting in fairly vituperative terms («baby killers», «rapists», «murderers» etc) about the war in Iraq at a homecoming for British troops.

«We see no reasonable possibility, in light of the record as a whole, that that flaw affected the outcome of the case,» the court said of Boyland's complaints about his jury instructions.