Sentences with phrase «about a nonsense paper»

Readers may recall a post a year ago about a nonsense paper by Hermann Harde that appeared in Global and Planetary Change.

Readers may recall a post a year ago about a nonsense paper by Hermann Harde that appeared in Global and Planetary Change.

Not exact matches

Readers learn about Haylee, an assertive, no - nonsense woman; Judy, who suffers from bulimia; Bonny, the responsible mother; Salome, a Catholic zealot; Sonia, who eats paper; Rebecca, who has attempted suicide; Ken, a 21 - year - old gay man; Dawn, a woman who is in constant search of her baby Skye... the list goes on.

You never have to worry about all this 14 - day - limit and lend - once nonsense and, unlike paper books, a book can be read on up to 6 devices at the same time.

BTW, the SkepticalScience piece about a 40 year lag is badly written as it implies that there is no effect immediately after the cause which is nonsense and not what Hansen said in the paper referenced there.

So the claim that «Scientists expect this [i.e., disingenuousness] and know that reviewers may need to be disingenuous when talking publicly about a paper they have reviewed» is nonsense.

educated as an engineer and find much of this statistics talk eye rolling boring... funny thing about engineering... not much use for statistics... a bridge that is safe to 95 % confidence is not a bridge but a death trap... It all comes down to data... and you don't have any... what you have is 3rd hand massaged nonsense... even your new paper will just be putting lipstick on a pig...

How is it that the conclusions of climate scientists can be called into question as a result of supposedly dubious statistical techniques, but the long history of nonsense from the skeptics, (such as the Robinson et al paper that accompanied the politically motivated Oregon Petition, the corporate funded propaganda campaigns of the Global Climate Coalition, and the recent urban myth that Martian «global warming» disproves a human influence on earthly climate) tells us nothing about the integrity of the skeptic theory of climate?

I have been up to my neck for over a year in a huge row with Iannis Kominis about the underlying quantum mechanics of spin sensing chemical reactions, and either his papers or mine (or just possibly both) are complete nonsense: but nobody has resigned over Koniminis's paper in Phys Rev B or mine in Chem Phys Lett.