Sentences with phrase «about abortion rights»

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference UPDATE: «The Supremes talked about abortion rights, not Roe v. Wade»:

Main UPDATE: «The Supremes talked about abortion rights, not Roe v. Wade»»

Education - related issues are expected to take a back seat to questions about abortion rights and presidential powers during the possibly lengthy grilling of U.S. Supreme Court nominee Samuel A. Alito Jr. by the Senate Judiciary Committee that was set to begin this week.

After seven Democratic debates without a question about abortion rights, Clinton and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders last night finally addressed the subject during a Fox News televised town hall.

Sorry, at this time two posts above have been deleted, but I just woke up and found it hilarious that there's a CPP comment, one blank and edited comment, one deleted one, and then yours about abortion right after.

Not exact matches

Ms. Schwartz's concerns about the threats to gender equality, abortion rights and other freedoms appear to be widely held among her peers.

Asked about Democrats having enough leeway on polarizing issues like gun rights and opposition to abortion, House Democratic Caucus chair Joe Crowley said in a press conference on Wednesday that the party «always has been» a big tent.

The economy, the one message they which could swing the election in their favor and what are they talking about — abortion rights.

The Dems will successfully make the campaign about abortion and women's rights and divert attention from the economy.

One night, at a ladies» evening out, the subject of abortion came up; and I overheard Jennifer admit that she really didn't know much about the legal background to abortion rights.

Despite Jody's observations, I think McCain was absolutely right not to spend a lot time talking about abortion and related issues in his acceptance speech.

It was a campaign to educate people about the horror of abortion and to illuminate the patent absurdity of claiming that a fetus with no rights suddenly became a baby with rights when it got its navel through the birth canal.

If we actuall had a Congress who cared about the People they swore to serve and did not take vacations 1 week for every 2 they work (new Boehner rule when he became Speaker), actually did work and created bills that were other than ending abortion rights or killing Medicare, stopped opposing ending the fraud Bush wars that raise our debt by more than a trillion a month (and Republicans then blame Obama for the rising debt from their wars), and acted like humans we would already be well into recovery.

Other readers took offense at some pastors in the article who declared that Obama couldn't be a Christian because he never talked about being «born again» and he supported same - sex marriage and abortion rights.

There's been much speculation about whether white evangelicals, who have accounted for more than a third of Republican votes in recent elections, will turn out in force for Mitt Romney, a Mormon who for years supported abortion and gay rights.

I would like to hear from both Perry and Bachmann about how they read this passage, and how it can simultaneously justify opposition to abortion rights and support for the death penalty.

Before the election, many evangelical leaders predicted that opposition to Obama over his support for abortion rights, his personal endorsement of same - sex marriage and his vision of government as a force for good would trump reservations evangelicals had about Romney's past social liberalism and his Mormon faith.

The wife employed outside the home is more likely to apply what free time she has to the cause about which she cares the most, be it hunger, abortion, child abuse or women's rights.

I could be against abortion personally, but ambivalent about its legality, right?

Will traditional marriage follow the path of preborn life — an issue moving from judicial activism and socially elite proclamations that a generational shift was «inevitable» and «the debate is over» to our day decades later where the youngsters are more right minded about abortion than their parents.

What do you think a Christian should think about when deciding whether abortion is wrong or right?

The author is concerned about the unborn child, yet voted for Obama who would not even defend the right to life of a baby who survives an abortion!!

And we've seen, when issues of racial injustice flare up, vocal pro-lifers wonder why civil rights leaders don't seem as concerned about the injustice of abortion.

Take the 1 in 3 Campaign, for example, whose mission is to «start a new conversation about abortion» and to «create a more enabling cultural environment for the policy and legal work of the abortion rights movement.»

Much of the mainstream media coverage of Roe v. Wade» srecent forty - year anniversary indicated that grassroots abortion rights activists are pessimistic about the future.

I care about the life people like you are attempting to force in to this world, you care about what appeases your god - big difference when you really don't care or consider the child only what your imaginary friend god wants and yet your god cause abortions all the time... you care about a clump of cells, not the actual life of the child and that's much worse than me supporting the rights of a woman to have control over her body, especially if the clump of cells couldn't survive outside of the host.

We also can not verify how «god» feels about abortion, gay rights, euthanasia, immigrants, war, or any other BS.

Much of the mainstream media coverage of Roe v. Wade's recent forty - year anniversary indicated that grassroots abortion rights activists are pessimistic about the future.

«Thou shalt not interfere with a woman's right to choose abortion; indeed, thou must help to pay for abortions through tax money; more than that, thou shalt not legislate that the woman contemplating abortion must be fully informed about the potential adoptive parents who desperately want to provide a loving home for her unborn child.»

The only thing Mitt is «consistent» about is that he is INconsistent and has flipped on abortion, gun rights, gay rights, healthcare, tax cuts, minimum wage, Vietnam, and climate change.

They've been about questioning Obama's citizenship (not economic), suppressing abortion rights (not economic), restricting union rights (not economic), fighting gay rights (not economic), and limiting voting rights (not economic).

We would rather yell about abortion and gay rights that face the pain of hunger, homelessness, and need.

The Hawaiian court has thus set itself on the same course of action as the misguided Supreme Court in 1973 when it thought that laws about abortion were merely an assertion of the rights of a living mother and an unborn fetus.

Of course she says nothing about her husband's policy of overlooking human rights violations by China, including the slave labor of uncounted thousands and forced abortions for pregnant women with more than one child.

A political operative explains, «You get the sense that for the single mother who makes $ 29,000 a year, they [the editors] care a lot more about her right to an abortion than her right to decent health care from her union.»

The reason: «Proponents of abortion rights overcame Americans» qualms about the procedure with a long series of claims about the benefits of unrestricted abortion on demand.

From the outset, Lastman writes that «abortion is ultimately not about rights, or about career, or reputation, or want, or not want.

People see the abortion as being principally about the rights of a woman not to have that pregnancy imposed upon her if she does not want it.

It condemns sex - selective abortion and female infanticide, although one wonders exactly why, and exactly how it intends member states to go about addressing what it calls the «root causes of son preference» in benighted native cultures that don't understand all about human rights the way that most EU countries do.

Even so, Hartshorne takes a solidly pro-choice stance: that no one can fully understand the complexities an individual weighs when making a decision about a pregnancy; that no governmental body is entitled to dictate to individuals what the available choices are, including abortion; and that ultimately the woman directly involved has the right to make a decision about her commitment to a pregnancy without moral condemnation.

David Landry does not hesitate to speak directly to corporate social issues about abortion, drug abuse, ecological rape, or minority rights in Metro City and beyond because he understands social contextuality as the norm for the Word realizing itself.

Interestingly, in September the Clinton Justice Department made some noises about possibly appointing some federal judges who are not on «the right side» of the abortion question.

Only about 15 percent of Americans claim there is an unlimited right to abortion all the way up to birth minus a day, and I don't believe these people are all obsessive ideologues by any means.

I am not arguing the point of right or wrong about abortion.

While there is, as one might expect, a correlation between right - to - die attitudes and abortion attitudes, there has been no statistically significant change in responses to NORC's battery of questions about the legality of abortion.

That is why every few years the Court must reiterate this abortion right as foundational to its legitimacy and to all the cases about privacy decided since Roe....

Raised Right: How I Untangled My Faith From Politics by Alisa Harris — If, like me, you knew what abortion was before you knew where babies came from, you'll love this funny and insightful book about finding faith outside of politics.

3 Incidentally, questions about abortion should not, I think, enter in at all here, since the question as to whether abortion is right or wrong depends on whether one believes that killing is ever justified.

Those who are involved in small groups often claim that these groups have influenced how they think on political and economic issues — for example, raising their interest in questions of peace and social justice or, in the case of conservative religious groups, generating ire about abortion and gay rights.

It may protect the rights of youth to make moral decisions about abortion and contraception without the knowledge, and against the moral guidance, of their parents.