It comes at a time when President Donald Trump and other members of the administration have expressed doubt
about the accepted science of climate change, and are considering drastic cuts to federal funding for scientific research.
Not exact matches
You had better learn to
accept Jesus first or no dice, and even then our «
science» will focus on teaching you
about the miracles of Jesus.
Once we
accept that the language of Genesis is symbolic, then there is no difficulty in holding both what it really teaches
about creation and what we have learned from modern
science.
I guess sometimes it's humbling to sit and think
about how many people believe in every different religion no matter how different they are and then
science and
accepting the fact that a HUGE majority of people are going to be right or wrong when they die and some people spending their entire life trying to justify or prove something that may be wrong.
You likely deny evolution and global warming for no other reason than it makes you uncomfortable and hold
science to the impossibly high standard of having to explain every conceivable mystery
about the natural World before you will
accept it, but some moron at a pulpit doing magic hand signals of a Sundaymorning is enough to convince you he is communicating with some sky - god and turning grocery store bread and wine into flesh and blood.
Reading some of the ignorant comments on here
about science does make it hard to
accept evolution, because so many comments here don't evidence evolution.
If I
accepted the present goal of the
science of economics, I might still complain that it would be good to think
about it, but I would probably be talking with you
about some other topic.
Is it possible and after reading
about it i kept on thinking «i will sell to my soul for 20 carats get out shut up i will never ever sell my soul to you oh god please help me and this is continuing for a few days i am afraid that i have sold my sold to the devil have i please help and still i think god's way of allowing others to hate him us much worse even you know and can easily think think
about much better punishments like rebirth after being punished for all the sins in life and i am feeling put on the sin of those who committed the unforgiviable sin (the early 0th century priests) imagine them burning in hell fire till now for 2000 years hopelessly screaming to god for help i can't belive the mercy of god are they forgiven even though commiting this sin keans going to hell for entinity thank you and congralutions i think the 7 year tribulation periodvis over in 18th century the great commect shooting and in 19th century the sun became dark for a day and moon was not visible on the earth but now satun has the domination over me those who don't belive in jesus crist i used to belive in him but now after knowing a lot in
science it is getting harharder to belive in him even though i know that he exsists and i only belived in him not that he died for me in the cross and also not for eternal life and i still sin as much as i used to before but only a little reduced and i didn't
accept satan as my master but what can i do because those who knowingly sin a lot and don't belive in jesus christ has to
accept satan as their master because he only teaches us that even though he is evil he gives us complete freedom but thr followers of jesus and god only have freedom because they can sin only with in a limit and no more but recive their reward after their life in heaven but the followers of satun have to go to hell butbi don't want to go to hell and be ruled by the cruel tryant but still why didn't god destroy satun long way before and i think it was also Adam and eve's fault also they could have blamed satan and could have also get their punishment reduced but they didn't and today we are seeing the result
Donald Johanson put the point effectively, if crudely: «You can't
accept one part of
science because it brings you good things like electricity and penicillin and throw away another part because it brings you some things you don't like
about the origin of life.»
As usually presented, then, even by its more sophisticated spokesmen, classical theism requires acceptance of statements
about the world,
about its origin or end or the happenings within it, which men today are willing to
accept, if at all, only with the backing and warrants of
science or history.
Although Kim is ambivalent
about it (SM xiii), he seems to
accept a version of this disciplinary dualism, seeing no way around Donald Davidson's view that psychology is «a hermeneutic inquiry rather than a predictive
science» because the laws of the mind «are normative rather than predictive laws» (SM 211).
This I can not square away — however, I look at the gay issue much differently than most — I think it's much to complicated and we are jumping the gun by saying we just
accept gay marriage — or it's an evil sin — what
about the
science that says testosterone starts forming around the babies brain when they are only 8 weeks into the womb?
You likely deny global warming for no other reason than it makes you uncomfortable and hold
science to the impossibly high standard of having to explain every conceivable mystery
about the natural World before you will
accept it, but some moron rolling around a floor speaking in tongues is enough to convince you he is channeling a spirit.
(ii) you, JW, have a startling new piece of evidence that was right before our eyes that will turn
accepted biological
science and
about 10 other
sciences on their heads if ONLY people would listen to you, no doubt earning you a Nobel Prize and a place in history beside the likes of Darwin, Newton and Einstein; or
I'm not talking
about «neo-darwinism;» I'm talking
about the evolutionary theory that the entire scientific community
accepts as proven fact because it is proven fact, and because
science reaffirms its factual status a couple of thousand times a day.
I don't know where you heard that «
science can't
accept that god always existed» because no scientific claims have ever been made
about god.
If it is such a «scientifically incorrect» theory then why don't you publish something in a
science journal
about it and try to sway the more than 99 % of scientists who
accept it as true.
You are comfortable
accepting your faith in the scientific method and the laws that we recognize in
science to be capable of one day answering those questions
about origins «evolving» from «nothingness».
Those who know more
about climate
science, for example, are slightly more likely to
accept that global warming is real and caused by humans than those who know less on the subject.
For Republicans, the more knowledge they have
about climate
science the less likely they are to
accept the theory of anthropogenic global warming (whereas Democrats» confidence goes up).
About 200 officers are
accepted each year to the Naval Postgraduate School (NPS) in Monterey, California, to study full time for a master's or Ph.D. qualification in engineering or
science.
«I was pleasantly surprised by the fact that there were unanimous decisions
about most issues, and strong consensus on the others,» says Ron Fouchier, a flu virologist at Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, whose study has been
accepted by the journal
Science.
In 2009 he said, when talking
about climate change, that the «
science is highly contentious, to say the least» and «the climate change argument is absolute crap», but did
accept that precautionary action against it was a good idea.
Will the Wall Street Journal's editorial writers
accept a challenge to learn the truth
about the
science of global climate change?
By early summer 2011, Silverman was ready to
accept Coffin's analysis and had become increasingly uneasy
about his contributions to the 2009 data in the
Science paper
about CFS.
«My interest is in effectively teaching the
science,» Lark says, explaining that understanding or learning
about something and
accepting it are not the same thing.
In the cases, just this last couple of elections, where stem cell politics, for example, has been played out in the electoral process, stem cell research is [has] done better than the winning candidates for offices; and I think, apart from that, I think that we do have a serious problem in general education of the
sciences and that accounts for the reluctance of a large segment of the population to
accept the principles of evolution and think that there is still a debate
about it, which there isn't — and that's a problem we need to solve, — but I still think there is an incredible constituency for
science in this country.
Non-biologists who wish to learn
about life
sciences may also be
accepted for a Ph.D. or postdoc.
Thankfully, the National
Science Foundation was adventurous enough to
accept my funding proposal and support my theoretical work, so I didn't have much time to worry
about my career prospects.
For example, the discussion we were having earlier
about the multiverse raised the issue of what we expect from a scientific theory — when do we reject it as being outside of
science; when do we
accept it as being confirmed.
Kawaoka also discusses his thoughts
about the recommendation from the U.S. government's National
Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) that Nature and
Science, which has
accepted but not published a paper by the second lab that did these studies, redact key portions of the experiments to prevent the widespread dissemination of the recipe for a potential bioweapon.
Dozens of open - access journals targeted in an elaborate
Science sting
accepted a spoof research article, raising questions
about peer - review practices in much of the open - access world.
First, check if your
science fair has a computer
science category and check with your teacher or fair organizer
about what types of projects will be
accepted.
With the subject matter rotating each year among astrophysics, nanoscience and neuroscience, reporters
accepted in the competitive program are provided a unique opportunity to learn in - depth
about the
science and issues in these fields from researchers based at the university and other institutions, including the Kavli Institutes.
Eric got
accepted to Rutgers University to major in Exercise
Science and he's very excited
about his future.
We've sat through an entire generation of fantasy and
science fiction films
about a protagonist gifted with extraordinary powers who first Resists, then
Accepts The Call, which almost always involves saving the world, defeating a powerful villain, and re-establishing the status quo.
In Mike Cahill's new film, I Origins, there's a scene where atheist scientist Ian (Michael Pitt) is told by an Indian woman of faith
about a pujari friend who admitted that if
science were to ever invalidate his beliefs, he would
accept that reality.
(d) He said the fourth system change concerns the way we organize ourselves as humans, urging us to make sure our organizational principles align with what we know
about the planet (he admitted he fully
accepts the climate change
science).
Toshiba America Foundation
accepts applications from teachers who are passionate
about making
science and mathematics more engaging for their students.
The Toshiba America Foundation is
accepting applications from middle - and high - school teachers who are passionate
about making
science and mathematics more engaging for their students.
Amid debate
about where charter schools fit into the spectrum of public education options, I
accepted an invitation to visit Horizon
Science Academy - McKinley Park on Chicago's South Side.
I don't care
about being
accepted into a «professional» author's group, be it the
Science Fiction Writers of America, The Screenwriters Guild, or Michael Kozlowski's list of approved book club reading.
About six months ago, the
Science Fiction Writers of America announced a new policy,
accepting self - published authors if they met the same level of sales as the advance for a first time author with a traditional publisher.
Before I dive into a few of the details from the study, I want to note that my comments
about the study are based solely on the news article, as I've been unable to find an actual copy of the study online anywhere — so my opinions of it may change if I can ever get a full copy (which should be available at some point since it has been
accepted for publication in the journal Applied Animal Behavior
Science).
Curiously
about 70 % of people want more renewable energy despite this, which shows they might actually
accept the
science more than they admit in that particular poll.
@ 58 Hank, first the general public (nor I) needs to educate themselves
about the intricacies of «statistics» in the links to
accept the climate
science and act accordingly.
The fact that neither you nor Rodger nor apparently anyone else posting here is willing to
accept that very simple logic says a lot
about the confirmation bias that appears to dominate mainstream climate
science generally.
Jim Hansen discusses the latest
science in April 2012 This is
about a month after his latest paper was
accepted by PNAS.
There are quite a few Republicans in Congress that understand and
accept climate
science, unfortunately they are not being all that vocal
about it right now.
I
accept that Gavin et al. will teach me a whole helluva lot more
about climate
science than I will ever teach him
about anything — unless I want to set up a website
about radiation physics and he for some reason wants to know something
about it.