Ha, good point Tarik
about arguing against it but using it.
Whether or not you like cap & trade, the way they go
about arguing against it is terribly unprofessional and just makes them look silly.
What you said
about arguing against charter schools on first principles struck me in a particular way.
Not exact matches
The lawsuit filed
against Facebook on behalf of the communications workers
argues that the company essentially plays the role of an employment agency — collecting and providing data that helps employers locate candidates, effectively coordinating with the employer to develop the advertising strategies, informing employers
about the performance of the ads, and so forth.
In his job as an activist at the Center for Popular Democracy, Barkan led a successful effort to get Fed officials thinking more
about low - income Americans as they conduct monetary policy, often
arguing against interest rate hikes in the face of high underemployment and weak wage growth.
He
argued that it would lead to a long period of uncertainty in which «Europe would be increasingly inward - looking, consumed with divisive debates
about its future
against the backdrop of an anti-immigration and anti-free trade backlash.»
When bonds yield 1.75 % for investment - grade bonds, then it's difficult to turn that into a 5 % -10 % return going forward... If he wants to
argue against that, and talk
about Dow 5000 and bear and bull markets, then he's welcome to, but he's pushing at windmills in my opinion, and he belongs back in his ivory tower.
Here is John Carney
arguing that «There's nothing
about Bitcoin that means you can't have fractional reserve banking,» which is entirely correct but bear in mind that he's
arguing against libertarian bitcoin supporters who view the absence of fractional reserve banking as a desirable feature of bitcoin.
The porn actress, whose legal name is Stephanie Clifford, filed suit
against President Trump in Los Angeles Superior Court on Tuesday,
arguing that a nondisclosure agreement
about their alleged affair is invalid because Trump never actually signed it.
Media targets Mr. Trump has also been vocal
about his opposition to consolidation in the media, which he
argued was rigged
against him during the campaign.
I am not sure how serious Gerecht is
about that, since he apparently directly
argued against the concept in his 2011 book.
It amazes me that many on the left cry out
about separation of church and state when
arguing against prayer in school or the words in god we trust on money.
Its amazing how we
argue against something deemed to help our citizens, yet if a gun control bill was up for debate people would be in arms (pun intended)
about their right to own guns.
I think my question to those of you who couple atheism with evolution and climate change is: how can we as scientists even start trying to inform you
about the details of what you are
arguing against if you automatically presume everything we say is a blasphemous lie?
I think my question to those of you who couple evil atheism with evolution, the big bang, and climate change is: how can we as scientists even start trying to inform you
about the details of what you are
arguing against if you automatically presume everything we say is a blasphemous lie?
Against these two views, I
argued that the biblical gospel is pretty much everything related to the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus, including the prophecies
about Him, and the ongoing empowerment for life with God that we receive as believers.
My old friend Peter J. Leithart joins Tony Montanaro, Gary Inbinder, and Kelley Vincent to
argue» each for different reasons»
against my worries
about the implicit claims of authority made when modern democratic states employ the death penalty.
But she is also honest
about what they are up
against daily, and says the couple «
argue more than ever».
You used the common slurs atheists use to
argue About God and the Bible
against them.
Jud 1:9 But Michael the archangel, when he disputed with the devil and
argued about the body of Moses, did not dare pronounce
against him a railing judgment, but said, «The Lord rebuke you!»
In 1934 he published Reflections on the End of an Era, in which he continued to
argue for a realistic political theory that would set power
against power and bring
about a more just social system.
George N. Boyd
argues against the traditional position of the opponents of capital punishment that no crime ever «deserves» the death penalty, and suggests that the debate is not over what murderers deserve, but rather
about how society should express and defend its fundamental values.
When I write
about non-violence, people sometimes say to me, You can't
argue against God.
Against this it
argues for fresh thinking
about the economic order, a thinking that locates the human economy in the larger economy of nature.
Indeed, those who think of marriage as only
about love tend to
argue against these duties, since they are regretted when feelings change.
The very fact that, in 2012, a presidential candidate from one party can create instant headlines by
arguing against a speech made by a presidential candidate of the other party, more than 50 years ago, should be enough to convince any fair - minded American that we still have much work to do as we try to reason with each other
about these questions.
@Todd — but either way (regarding my last post)-- I would think one could just as easily
argue that there is still nothing «immaterial»
about the tendency for the mind to behave similarly
against certain situations.
A number of analysts, anticipating the need to soften the blow
against the Democrats, began
arguing in October that the 2010 election was
about generalized anger directed at incumbents because of economic conditions.
If you care to apply the proper word (believe) to how you feel
about or toward your god, then we would not even be having this discussion, for why would I
argue against your accurate description of what you believe?
If you care to apply the proper word (believe) to how you feel
about or toward other minds and evidence, then we would not even be having this discussion, for why would I
argue against your accurate description of what you believe?
They might
argue even (
against Paul) that doing such things sends people to hell, rather than seeing references to the «Kingdom of God» or «Kingdom of Heaven» as Jesus used them, as being
about out lives here and now and what we might accomplish as we follow Christ (to which a «beneficial» conversation is much more fitting).
«A post
about child sponsorship isn't going to be followed by hundreds of comments and thousands of shares because no one's going to
argue against it.
It is so sad that so many atheists will spend most of their lives fighting and
arguing against the very thing that can save them, only to die and go to hell and then to spend eternity regretting the fact that they wasted all of their time
arguing about it rather than just accepting it, rather than just believing, and a belief that could have saved them.
as a theistic evolutionist, I do nt
argue against common ancestry (as you are well aware), I'm talking
about the great engineer Himself.
Since Buber and Nygren want to speak
about love in «non-causal» terms our alternative analysis of this category is especially necessary.6 I
argue against Buber and Nygren that love is meaningless without causality.
There isn't, David
argues, any evidence for the governor's claims
about the benefits of gambling, and the governor himself presents none, and a great deal of evidence
against it.
It is
against this background that our countryman, Archbishop Desmond Tutu, has rightly
argued that the church has to be concerned
about the secular things such as politics and economics, education, medical aid, the rent and housing, food prices et cetera.
Those who
argue against same - sex marriage on the basis of its potential to diminish the effectiveness of the institution as a solid foundation for social stability have not thought
about the price we have already paid for this personal freedom, or the historical reality that most citizens of Western Nations have already chosen to pay it rather than choose the relative social stability / security of tribalistic collectivism.
If depersonalization turns out to be the greatest single threat in the future, it can be strongly
argued that the church has the special role of warning
about this and safe - guarding the personal dimension
against encroachment in the name of efficiency, progress, or technological necessity.
I
argued against evolutionist teachers and students, but I never really cared
about science except to defend my faith.
Paul could have complained and
argued and become bitter
about his unjust arrest and the false accusations being made
against him.
Looking at the ingredients
against the photos, we can't
argue about how flavourful and tasty these falafels are!
But if his decision is more
about WINNING MORE CHAMPIONSHIPS, it will be hard to
argue against us.
I don't actually have strong feelings
about walk - throughs other than your side is at least as uninformed as the side you're
arguing against.
I have had my doubts
about Foles since last year, but you can't
argue 19 touchdowns
against zero picks.
Only last week had a chat
about arsenal and being soft in center I
argued the case for the benefit of arsenal to find out we are the hard way having said that the 2 goals scored
against us were suspect one being offside and the other well you can debate
about its legitimacy for ever a truly horrid day
Historical fact... while watching ARSENAL TV you tube saw Piers Morgan rant
against WENGER, start watching it because thought it was his most recent remarks
about ARSENAL current situation, so why not lets see what he has to say, well he
argue about poor results, the worse we have been since moving to the Emirates, lack of leadership, poor tactics, underperforming players, but what hit me was when he mentioned our exit from CL
against Bayern
arguing did not have what it take to overcome 0 -2 defeat
against Bayern.....
Seeing fans
arguing about what they want wrong with the club, and seeing the language that they were using
against each other was enough to make me abstain from social media for a good 4 hours.
May be it's too early to say
about that; but it can not be
argued that Barca played some of the their best football's in their last two matches - first
against Manchester City and now
against Osasuna.
It has never occurred to me to find a page that I feel strongly
against (I considered giving an example but I don't want to invite drama), then start
arguing with the members
about how wrong they are.