Sentences with phrase «about arguments like»

Most horror geeks have no doubt enjoyed the [REC] vs. [REC] 2 debate, and the best thing about arguments like this is that neither side is wrong.

Not exact matches

Conversations about emotional issues like animal cruelty can quickly devolve into heated arguments.

Check out the complete post for another three killer tips, learn more about how to pack like a pro here, or read one argument for why founders should only fly first class.

On pp. 19 - 21, Michael McCullough explores Warren Buffett's argument for why wealthy Americans like him should pay more taxes — which raises fundamental questions about distributive justice, freedom, and property rights.

Many of the outlets that have given up on comments make the same arguments about why they did so, and one of the main ones is that social - media platforms like Twitter (twtr) and Facebook (fb) make comments unnecessary.

Critics from the right tend to be concerned about the content of their message, noting that successful CEO activism often advances left - leaning arguments on issues like gun control and diversity.

But Mnuchin extends that argument about transparency into something more like a rap sheet: take Beijing's money, he warns, and risk being trapped in a debilitating cycle of debt — something that has led to asset - stripping by Chinese practitioners of what the National Defense Strategy calls «predatory economics.»

In the midst of all the cross-currents and arguments about Fed easing, speculation about economic turnarounds and the like, our discipline focuses on what the Market Climate is, rather than what it might or should be.

Analysts who retain sympathy for the gold standard, like self - confessed «gold bug» John Mauldin, have always understood that the main argument in favor of gold is that it imposes an unbreakable trade and capital flow discipline — indeed that is also the main argument against gold — but many of them have tended to de-emphasize reserve currency economics mainly, I think, because this particular problem is to them subsumed under their more general concerns about money.

The «stock accumulation» line refers to a toehold position that Simon has accumulated in Macerich; people like to complain about toeholds these days, but I have never heard a serious argument that they might be illegal.

I am not sure that I can balance all that I like about it with the feeling of always being in an argument.

Instead, when you make this argument to people about Singapore, lots of people go, «Oh, but it's a small island Asian country,» they start saying, «But, you shouldn't look at it,» and I'm like, «Really?

A bigger problem is that cynical pols like Romney (and Michelle Bachmann on this issue) end up feeding into this self - defeating narrative because it seems easier than making a real argument about health care or taxes or what have you.

You make up things about me just like your gay arguments.

Actually, my favorite of hers, which unfortunately I can no longer find the link to, was something about the argument tactics of conservatives: That we like to overwhelm our opponents with... what was it?

There is considerable argument about whether the Dikika girl could also climb trees like an ape.

As a journalist, I like having an argument about Catholicism as much as the next person.

I read two articles last year (which I didn't document, like you, thinking it was out of the question) about pedophiles making the exact same argument as the present day argument that homosexuals have taken from the cause of the Black people; «they were born that way.»

What I like about Fox is their insistence on BOTH sides of any argument appear together to voice the argument of either side.

Wonder explains the heartbreaking honesty in a book like A Grief Observed, wherein Lewis returns to his past arguments about evil and suffering amid the pain of losing his own wife.

And even if all rough correlations could be made smooth by convoluted arguments about cloud covers and the like, the two Genesis accounts themselves, taken as chronologies, do not agree.

The moral arguments against pornography are well - known, and recently, several big - name celebrities and sources like Time magazine have been warning about the effects porn has on the brain.

Atlanta is often compared to Twin Peaks (creator Donald Glover said it himself about the show's first season, calling it «Twin Peaks with rappers»), but there's an argument to be made it's more like The Simpsons.

If somebody votes for a party that you don't agree with, you're free to argue about it as much as you like; everybody will have an argument but nobody feels aggrieved by it.

If we're talking about the same universe, then you can conclude anything you like from that argument.

I especially like the parts about the rather abstract sense of victimhood, which blinds us to real suffering, and the assumption that modern thinkers aren't «rational agents» who give arguments that need to be engaged, because they're characteristically neither wholly true nor wholly false.

He cared enough about the issue to study and construct an in depth argument about the many similarities between Romneycare and Obamacare like guaranteed issue, community rating, government - imposed coverage mandates and of course the insurance purchase mandate.

The civil libertarian argument — something Republicans like King used to care about — is, of course, compelling.

The thing about Chad is, like Gould and Jesus who are dead, his views can't change in response to any arguments or new information.

So Laurence Tribe» who ought to know» acknowledges «the possibility of making noises in the Constitution's language that sound like an argument for just about anything,» and he frets that «the text of the Constitution can be read to justify just about any decision» and so can safely be ignored.»

A typical Hartshornian restatement of Anselm's argument in the language of modern modal logic runs about like this: Since God is by definition not conceivably surpassable, and since a being whose existence is necessary surpasses one whose existence is merely contingent, therefore, God's existence must be necessary existence.

Odds are, there will be some people at your church will get into a social media argument about such a move by a team they probably don't like and would normally never pay attention to.

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

Many of us who have written about Rawls» argument have noted that the people behind his famous «veil of ignorance» are a peculiar kind of people (i.e., people very much like John Rawls) and therefore can hardly serve as the normative deliberators producing universal moral principles.

Don't fall into CNN or Fox Network lies, they don't care about God or your eternal salvation, just posting something so Ungodly like this is so Bad, (listen... Get close to Christ the redeemer of mankind) don't get into foolish arguments like this, Hollywood and all media is just the tipping point of the iceberg of something more evil happening, and to believers: get your doctrine straight and don't defend the works of this man (Stephen King) he is not giving glory to God with his live and work, there's many men of God that need your support that really give glory to God.

I could preach about how there is a separation of church and state but i would like to believe that goes without saying... instead i shall present an argument that looks at the belief systems that arose before jesus and preached similar messages.

If god made the universe in such a way that kids could never know about death or disease or deformity until a certain age, then maybe you could use an argument like that, but not the way things are.

The idea about having to have human like beingS, visable or invisible, manipulate things to prove intelligence, is the underlying fallacy of any argument against an intelligent universe.

Maybe if we were having a discussion on something like faith or the topic of this thread but considering this all came about from you trying to «win» an argument on a grammar technicality..

Like the argument about human progress, it indicates that there must have been a beginning.

The idea that everyone is wrong except for you about God hardly seems like a solid argument for criticizing another person's skepticism.

It's like getting into a heated argument with friends over what your fortune cookie is saying about your life.

For the record, some countries (like the former Soviet Union) did perform abortions very frequently because there weren't other effective forms of birth control.Some conservatives that I speak with counter my argument about birth control by suggesting that everyone needs to be responsible for the cost, education and hassle of this themselves.

What amazes me about guys like this is that they can only frame an argument based in their own frame of reference.

Work is stressful, we have sleepless nights over our cash flow, Friday nights spent dealing with problems in our building site and arguments over who will walk Austin — just like everyone else, but when you're worrying about your own things, I'm not going to add mine to the list.

«We're all for arguments about the ethics of meat consumption, but we also realise that the easiest way to encourage vegetarianism is to make it seem like less of a frontier and more of a transition.

Ever think about how there's a good argument for cookies being the superior baked good, over things like cakes and cupcakes?

Arguments about food are not like arguments aboArguments about food are not like arguments aboarguments about sport.

They are not like arguments about music or literature or, god help us politics.

One second you're well - actuallying a bandwagon fan about why Andre Iguodala is a good player even if he shoots free throws like a trained dolphin, where hitting the rim is an accomplishment what with the flippers and all, and the next minute that bandwagon fan is using PER in an argument about why someone should be benched.