Sentences with phrase «about average this season»

Not exact matches

«Idol,» which averaged more than 30 million weekly viewers at its 2006 peak and ranked No. 1 for nine consecutive years, averaged about 11 million last season (still enough by today's standards to land it in the top 20, but with fewer advertiser - favored younger viewers).

Network viewership increased 93 percent or by about 2 million more viewers on average during the first four events this season that Woods finished inside the top 25, Nielsen said.

According to Nielsen, network viewership increased 93 percent or by about 2 million more viewers on average during the first four events this season that Woods finished inside the top 25.

That's one of the worst time slots in television — yet Shark Tank averaged about 8.4 million viewers per episode last season, putting it in 55th place.

Using monthly levels of Moody's yield on seasoned Aaa corporate bonds and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) during October 1928 through February 2018 (about 90 years) and monthly levels of the 10 - year government bond interest rate and the stock market from Robert Shiller during January 1871 through February 2018 (about 148 years), we find that: Keep Reading

Each park boasts several «lands,» scores of attractions, dozens of food facilities and more than fifty shops, employs three to seven thousand people depending on the season, and entertains about 10,000 people on an average day.

If we are speaking about contract extensions then the biggest one is Arsene Wenger's, hopefully this is his last year and he won't renew it, Arsenal need a new direction from lame tactics, a breath of fresh air after 20 years of Wenger and only winning 3 league titles in that time at an average of 1 title every 6.7 seasons!

The Ox joined us from Southampton in 2011 but after six years at the Emirates, in which he only averaged playing half the League games in each season and was played in nearly every position as he was moved about by Wenger whenever he needed cover.

Football was never about loyalty.It's just a choice.We'll always mention how loyal some players were but won't mention how loyalty has finisbed the careers of some players.Such players stay in the team and waste their talent till they can no more longer reproduce their ability instead of moving for better chances.I know you know what I mean.One such player is Jack Wilshere.If he had left Arsenal seasons back there was a high chance that he'd have been world class since his injuries would've have been greatly reduced.I'd likd to see top players who are loyal to average teams for me to call them truly loyal since it's far more easier to be loyal to top teams.

People keep using stats to defend him because that's the only way to defend him.When you watch him most at times you he hardly wows you or is any special.Can i ask a question couldn't Chamakh or Bendtner or Aliadiere score about 15 - 18 goals with this super super creative arsenal midfield.I mean lets be honest if Chamakh in his first season should have scored 20 goals in EPL many people would still want him out you know why because watching every aspect of his game and also analyzing every aspect of his game he was below average in his time at arsenal to be honest.So its not only about stats because stats do nt tell me the whole story about a player though they are facts and don't lie the eyes do nt lie.And with this same eyes we look at players and say Aguero is better thab Bony, Costa is better than Remy, and so on.

Wilshere for all his injuries is far better than both Ramsey and Xhaka.I just don't know the importance of Xhaka in the team if he can't defend.He's the real problem in the squad.Why do fans keep accepting mediocrity?Aren't we tired?It's painful seeing him play every match in our midfield then the same people who claim to love him would come and be making noise about how average he is after a bad match forgetting that he's actually average.I'd easily play Maitland - Niles or Coquelin over Xhaka.They would provide more steel in the midfield.Is it going to take us four seasons to realize how average Xhaka is?The painful things is that by that time many trophies would've have by passed us.

Forget everything else... if the game went over exactly as it did, but with the Spurs hitting their season average from 3 (35.2 %, which is about league average), we would have won last night's game by three points (10 made threes for 30 points, versus 4 made threes for 12 points).

So based on his history an average season (about six sacks) would price out at about $ 5.3 m whereas a bad season (under one sack) is $ 3.6 m and a good season (around twelve) prices in at around $ 7m.

To illustrate the method, a typical No. 7 seed would expect to win about 0.9 games per tournament, on average, while a No. 7 seed with an SRS 2.9 points better than the seed average — like Michigan State this season — would expect to win about 1.0 games per tournament.

This season Hull has been averaging about 40 minutes of ice time for every 60 - minute game.

Cesc gets about 13 - 15 assists a season on average and about 13 - 15 goals..

Moving on from it all for this season i fear for worst to come next season (just had a deja vu i say the same thing every season around this time) City already are talking spending 600 Million in the next two to three years on new players and you can bet Man - U will follow to try and close the gap, Liverpool can sell one player and buy an entire squad, Chelsea owner Abromovich has started to make noise's about next season so they will be spending, spuds will try to keep their existing players with one or two additions to strengthen and some salary rises to keep the elite, and Arsenal will go head to head with the likes of Burnley Everton Leicester for average players signature, and the board will make sure even if they replace AW they will replace him with AW No2 who will do what the board decides on who and how much to spend

Justin Verlander is owed about $ 70 million more through 2019, and is in the midst of a below - average season at age 34.

Drogba averaged about 14 goals a season in all competitions for 6 out of 8 seasons at Chelsea, does that change the fact that Drogba was one of the EPL's most feared strikers in his prime?

Last season, he missed more bats than he ever had, taking a leap from a pitcher who averaged about a strikeout per inning to a monster who would sneak a couple extra strikeouts in just about every start.

Very good game for the team but I don't think Villa is the kind of team to measure our progress, they are the worst team in possession out of all the teams, their average possession for this season together with last season is about 28 %.

Should this even be a topic?Giroud is a player of average quality always surrounded by good players.I just don't get.It's as if only Arsenal fans rate him.This was a player who was bought to be the leading striker at Arsenal and after his years of failure which many deny he's now become a super sub?How laughable is that.From failure to super sub.If the so called world class striker we're signing goes out with an injury for about five months who comes in then.It seems to me people lack vision.Why is it always Giroud Giroud Giroud?After so many seasons people are still debating what souldn't even be debatable.I've lost count of the number of times he's been talked about here.This is the problem with our club.It's just not ruthless.This is a player who should have been gone long ago but due to him being French he still gets the chances.We won't miss him when he goes and I'd like to see if he'd stand out in a smaller club.

I thought people here were debating about two or three seasons back why he should be our top striker.When I thought the Monaco match was the icing on the cake to show how average he was it seems just like Wenger we» will never learn our lesson.Now people our okay with him being a super sub which is debatable.Giroud was a super sub in games last season because he wasn't played when he was supposed to.He's not your ideal super sub because he very hardly creates but rather requires people to create for him.Most of the time super subs are the one's who tend to create the chances and open up spaces in the opposition defence.West ham are ready to pay and hence we should demand more from them.We can then use the money from his sale on far better players.Given the same seasons, time and chances a lot of average strikers can do better than what he did.This is because Arsenal create a lot of chances and it just needs someone who can finish.Goodbye!.

Last season Xhaka was able to at least supply quality passes but was still very average defensively.He's never going to be good enough as a CM or DM in the long run for Arsenal if you truly assess his qualities.All he can do is pass and shoot.Everything else about him is average.

What's particularly strange about this is that they were listed ahead of former number one overall selection Anthony Davis (+12500), who actually ranked 14th in scoring last season after averaging 20.8 ppg.

Callum Wilson, at 23 years of age, he is developed enough to start, whilst also having time to improve, he has already scored 4 this season all coming in his last 2 games, he has decent pace and seems very composed in front of goal and he averages just 2 shots per goal, one big plus about this deal would be that he would not be too expensive, playing for bournemouth I could see him coming for less than # 10million.

When Samuel commented on why it was wrong to sell Lucas Perez you brought up stats between Walcott and Perez and in that you proved using the stats why Walcott is better.If Wenger didn't have blond love for some of his players then why did he keep benching Perez when he was performing yet the average guys always got a look in the squad.So if there are stats which prove Walcott is better aren't there stats which also prove Perez is better?Think about that.You also said Perez is not as good as some of us make out.The funny thing is yesterday we had an argument on Giroud and I also tried to imply that Giroud is not as good as we make out and you opposed.You always kept bringing stats up to defend him.Do you know if Bendtner or Chamakh had scored 25 goals for Arsenal in any season they'd still have been regarded as average.You know why?Because quality has nothing to do with stats and is just a kind pf talent or state.It seems to me that you think you know it all.You also denied the fact that Wenger likes French players and that if Perez was French he wouldn't have been out in one season stating other players as examples.It seems to me that you deny things which are clear for everyone to see.If you think you know better than everyone go and teach Wenger how to win the trophy this season.

Giroud is awful no matter how many times you defend him he'll keep messing up, every Arsenal game Giroud gets on average about 5 chances at goal but he can't even score 1, let me remind you that including end of last season in the last 11 Arsenal games Giroud has scored once!

They appoint average managers who get sacked after a season or two and yet they won two League titles, which speaks volumes about the quality of the league at the moment.

This one was a little trickier to figure out because they used to play two All - Star Games per year back when people actually cared about them, so we'll average out the number of All - Star seasons rather than total All - Star Games.

What do you mean by average?I doubt you watched him closely at Bournemouth.He was their best player and was running the show until the injuries came in.He always starts playing a bit like his old self when he plays string of games.Then just when his about to remind us then the injuries come.Anyone who says he was average at Bournemouth obviously didn't watch him.Also I feel the word «average «is used ignorantly a lot of times over here.I quite remember people here saying Serge Gnabry was average and deadwood.However, those that were watching him and knew his talent knew he wasn't average.If Arsenal sell Wilshere then they must pray that he doesn't have an injury free season because if he does he's gonna be one of the best.

Also when you reference injury luck, essentially every impact player that was injured last year is either not on the roster or still injured, so that incremental improvement is hard to see, probably is actually a new negative for 2018 as Chancellor, Sherman and Avril on average played about half the season, in 2018 it will be 0 games played respectively.

Walcott as average as people say he is can get us about a total of 16 goals in all competitions this season when in form.Coquelin looked really good in preseason and looks to have gotten his interception ability back.Elneny has the ability to position himself in such a way that there's always someone next to him so he can make a simple pass while possessing aggresiveness and being able to intercept.This is for now is a good lineup.It's unfair to keep playing those who have failed while others wait.We need to get players back to form quickly.We must also bring back Wilshere who is bettrr than Ramsey and Xhaka and gets to form quickly.

Bellerin, Holding, Chambers, Iwobi, are all players that started out great when introduced to first team, but then became bang average (or worse) after about a season.

players like Ozil always present the fans with a bit of a conundrum, especially when times are tough... if you look around the sporting world every once in awhile there emerges a player with incredible skill, like Ozil, Matt Sundin or even Jay Cutler, who have a different way about themselves... their movement seemed almost too lackadaisical, so much so that it seemed to suggest indifference or even disinterest on the part of the player... their posture always appears somewhat mopey and they generally have an unflattering «sour puss» expression on their face... for some their above average skills are enough to keep them squarely in the mix, as their respective teams try desperately to find a way to get the best out of them visa vie player acquisitions or the reworking of tactics... when things go according to planned the fans usually find a way to accept their unique disposition, whereas when things go awry they become easy targets for fans and pundits alike... in the case of Ozil and Sundin, their successes on the international stage and / or with their former teams led many to conclude that if we surrounded such talented individuals with players that have those skills that would most likely bring the best of these players success would surely follow... unfortunately both the Maple Leafs and our club chose to adopt half - measures, as each were being run by corporations who valued profitability over providing the best possible product on the field... for them, they cared more about shirt sales and season tickets than doing whatever was necessary... this isn't, by any stretch, an attempt to absolve Ozil of any responsibility for his failures on the pitch... there is no doubt oftentimes his efforts were underwhelming, to say the least, but this club has been inept when it comes to providing this prolific passer with the kind of players necessary for him to flourish... with our poor man's version of Benzema up front, the headless chickens in Walcott, the younger Ox and Welbeck occupying wide positions far too often and the fact that Carzola, who provided Ozil with great service and more freedom to roam, was never truly replaced, the only real skilled outlet on the pitch was Sanchez... remember to be considered a world - class set - up man goals need to be scored and for much of his time here he has been surrounded by some incredibly inept finishers... in the end, I'm not sure how long he will be in North London, recent sentiments and his present contract situation seem to suggest that he will depart at season's end, but how tragic would it be if once again we didn't put our best foot forward and failed to make those moves that could have brought championship football back to our once beloved club... so when you think about this uniquely skilled player don't be so quick to shift all the blame on his shoulders because he will not be the first or the last highly skilled player to find disappointment at the Emirates if we don't rid the club of those individuals that are truly to blame for our current woes

The Mets are up a bit from last season though, when the starters averaged about 5.3 IP per game for the full season.

he is 12 goals this season in elp in 29 matches, that would average about 16 goals per match in epl, he has averaged 13.3 so this is slightly better, but very dry for 10 matches, need over 20 consistent to win the league, otherwise need another player at 12 - 14.

After averaging 4.5 catches and 70 receiving yards per game over his first four NFL seasons, Johnson has gone about redefining his position over the last three, playing it better, one could argue, than anyone in the history of the game.

Personally, I do nt worry about LT — we had perhaps the greatest OT to ever play the game, and with no real QB to protect — we likely averaged 5 wins at most per year during his tenure — no playoff games — and 1 winning season.

Khiry Shelton is averaging a middling 0.22 xG per game, which would put him on target for about 8 goals this season.

Yes Cazorla has been a huge loss Ramsey has been hopeless Xhaka has been good for first season (not too concerned about 2 reds as Koscielny had 2 reds in his first season) Coquelin has been poor for his standards Eleney is average Ozil has underperformed this season

Not much is known about Diaz, however so far this season, the player has made an average start for this side.

Quality is not all about goals or stats you know.If it was a lot of Arsenal players would have been sold and many players would not even be regarded.People need to look at the bigger picture.He scored 16 goals last two season as the starting CF.You and I know that based on the chances he gets he should've been doing better.The guy is not even a clinical player from what we watch yet people will always deny that fact.The only case people make up for Giroud is his goals.They can't even talk about his quality on the ball and others because it's non existent.He was part of the reason why Arsenal couldn't win the trophy in 15/16 season.It's a shame we are compromising and refuse to state things the way they are.Even if Giroud scores 40 goals in the EPL qualoty wise he's still average.

They averaged about three wins per season for the next eight years.

At West Virginia, he had Rasheed Marshall, who averaged about 1,600 passing yards and 550 rushing yards per season.

In nine games this season, Ball has averaged about 16 points, three rebounds, and less than one assist, despite being held scoreless in his debut — all while shooting 44 percent from the floor and 45 percent behind the arc.

Despite concerns about his low - slot, high - elbow delivery, Sale has thrown at least 174 innings in each of his five seasons as a starter with an average of 203 innings pitched.

,, the guy is average and like all average players sometimes he has good spells sometimes awful this season he is awful and the fact that wenger has to start him is all I need to know about his inability to create a winning team... Same goes for Walcott and merteshaker... 45 minutes of dire football

Ramsey had one above - average season by his standards (which he's yet to replicate), and folks want to talk about him like he's Zidane.

com where he was discriminating Chelsea's style of play... I wonder when this old nag wud mind his team's business, we've not won sh ** for many years and he's more concerned about a title wining team's style of play... this man lacks shame... Is this what we are gonna face next season, how did we manage to put up with this fool for so long... he never talks about how his players are all average flops, but he's more concerned about how much manure and Chelsea bought pogba n others....