Sentences with phrase «about being gay at»

CNN: BYU student video on homosexuality is not in violation of honor code, says administrator The students featured in a video about being gay at Brigham Young University are not in obvious violation of the honor code, according to Carri Jenkins, an assistant to the president of BYU.

Not exact matches

The only surprise risk factor when it comes to demographics is being anything other than heterosexual, though sadly this still makes sense given that most gay or bisexual people will be in the minority at work and may worry about discrimination.

In case you don't remember, at the pageant, Hilton asked Prejean about her thoughts on gay marriage, to which she responded that she was against it.

Once the holdouts are paid, Argentina will eventually be able to issue debt at similar borrowing costs to neighboring Uruguay, at about 4.5 percent, Prat - Gay said at the same press conference.

In the ensuing furor, he opened up to radio host Charles Adler about his volunteer work during college at a nun - led centre for (mostly) gay men: «If the things they say about me are true, then explain to me why a young Jason Kenney spent his time washing bloody sheets at an AIDS hospice in San Francisco in the 1980s.»

At some point, we'd actually have to agree to disagree that homosexuality is a sin, and therefore not prejudice decisions about ministry and even marriage on being gay.

Most blasphemy must be 90 % correct to infiltrate the Church... Its not mentioned on your two intro lines, and is only mentioned in half a line at middle but, its gays at church that this is about..

If I was going to be perfectly honest with myself and with God — I needed to examine all the evidence out there and take an honest look at what was being said about these scriptures and about the gay community in general.

What he thought about gay people is irrelevant at best and one can not expect him alone to break the stigma of societal norm of his era (apparently many still live in that era).

Also I am a Christian and I don't bash other people or other religions, actually I get looked down at because I don't, I have a gay friend, I have a Muslim friends and boy oh boy do the Christians try to talk to me about how wrong they are, this is what I say to them» I'm not God, God says pretty clear that we are NOT TO JUDGE any one, and I don't, I just love them for who they are.

Fishon you make sense and I get where you are coming from on this issue — I held your exact same views for at least 10 years... I even debated gay people about it being a «choice».

Of course they may end up disagreeing with Bernard of Clairvaux, Augustine, and Barth about the moral significance of our being created male and female, but shouldn't they be a little less sanguine about it and a little more deferential, to the point of saying, «We believe the tradition made a grave mistake in its disallowance of gay partnerships, but at the same time we acknowledge our deep indebtedness to that tradition for giving us the theological and ethical vision to even make our argument for inclusion»?

Look at every over 40 member of your church and see if any of them are spending more time ministering or discussing Jesus than they are freaking out about their gun rights or gay people or Obama.

(CNN)- Columnist and gay - rights advocate Dan Savage is standing by his comment that «we can learn to ignore the bulls ** t in the Bible about gay people» at a recent conference for high school students, a line that prompted some to walk out and spurred intense online debate.

All you need is to look at the many responses to your comment on the post of the son coming out to his mother about being gay and you will have your explanation.

... The Jews (just like the church now) got flippant concerning divorce... I feel Jesus didn't have to mention homosexuality because the Law was clear to any Jew at that time... Paul had to mention it because he was an apostle to the Gentiles who I think were more prone to homosexuality behavior... I'm though not as learned as you... just my thought after 15 years of thinking about this issue... The church has a sacred duty to all... even gays... we need a unified loving answer to give them... but it must be the truth... because only the truth can set us free...

'' We are not just talking about photographers, florists, or cake decorators being forced to serve at gay weddings, though those concerns are legitimate.

But at the same time that I was learning to engage with God as a hungry, growing young Christian, the realization dawned on me like a dead weight sinking in my stomach that no amount of spiritual growth seemed to have any effect on my sexual preference... There was nothing, it felt, chosen or intentional about my being gay.

A barrage of such stuff, pouncing on any scandal that could be dug up and chipping away at the pontificate of Pope Benedict, not to mention the usual stuff about the need to elect a pope who would change the «policy» of the Church over such matters as abortion, gay marriage and women priests, had been unleashed almost immediately, once Benedict had been congratulated for bringing the papacy into the 21st century by resigning.

I've been watching people with golden crosses around their necks and on their lapels shout at the TV about how serving gay and lesbian people is a violation of their «sincerely - held religious beliefs.»

They are then further disturbed that the headteacher loyally supports the staff member who has made the children shout out «penis» or «vagina» at the front of the class, or has said that the Church will one day ordain women priests, or has talked openly about their gay partner.

Then you have no business telling anyone anything about scripture at all, because scripture doesn't support that belief anymore than it supports your belief that gays are doomed to hell or that Jews will burn in a lake of fire.

Sane people can disagree about whether there ought to be a right to privacy, i.e., about whether it is logically a natural right and if so perhaps ought to be put into the Constitution via amendment, or about whether we (usually at state - level) should pass particular laws, such as ones that legalize gay - marriage, that factually expand what might be called privacy, but no sane U.S. Citizen, gay, straight, liberal, or conservative, should be left ignorant about the Constitution - wounding judicial usurpations done in the name of this right, more of which are planned to be done soon enough.

Even among grown - ups when they sit about depressed, let a man appear at the door, a happy, gifted one with light heart and gay spirit, and let him say, «Here am I!»

It is not our fault that when certain people see perfectly innocent actions between gay people (holding hand while walking down the street, kissing good bye at the airport, bragging about their wonderful spouse, etc) their brains automatically go to what those people are doing in bed.

sure gay is wrong abortion is wrong but i am still in my seat rolling my eyes at the liberals who are hot and bothered about their freedoms but when the man, the capitolist tells us he's trying to get us jobs i scream that i don't want it i am out of my seat i am throwing things i got my dignity ambition i am not going to take it i am revolutionary america

If you want to say that engaging in gay s e x is a choice, yes, that's true, just like engaging in hetro s e x is a choice and you can choose to remain celibate if that's your thing or if someone made you feel so guilty about your preference at some points true, just like engaging in hetro s e x is a choice and you can choose to remain celibate if that's your thing or if someone made you feel so guilty about your preference at some points your thing or if someone made you feel so guilty about your preference at some point.

But to think a preacher or what even you'd like to call these people who think gays should be all dead maybe they should take a step back and look at their own life before saying things about others as well.

He and I ran into each other at an event, and somehow we were talking about gay rights.

Looking at it like that, it just makes me think that there is SO much we don't know, SO much we probably won't ever know, SO much that I really really really WANT to know,... and that I can't let myself worry about too many specifics, like whether someone is gay or not.

repost from Solomon Atheists are throwing in with gays not that they care about the gays but at least like the gays if they can get their own ways all the better

Are we going to be able to have a serious discussion about the rights of gays and the prejudices directed toward them and pray away the gay, while chomping away at a chicken stand?

Gay marriage isn't creating ANY of the problems you're frothing at the mouth about.

------ Boob spews: Atheists are throwing in with gays not that they care about the gays but at least like the gays if they can get their own ways all the better -----

I can see it now a bunch of sheep singing your gay so i can kill you and at the same time saying but god loves me and wants me to preach my hate about you being gay... LALalaa

We came up with that in the 90's and the 80 ′ to get at the religious right... what if we don't have a choice, that makes them biggots... If you say you are a gay conservative, suddenly their [the left's] heads explode... It's not about bigotry or homophobia because we could live in a perfect society and in many ways we pretty much do.

Any gay person can tell you of the same fear of rejection by those they trust the most at that time upon coming out... the religiously - minded in our society are so self - righteous about their beliefs that when a loved one comes out as a non-believer their first genuine instinct is to pity you and work frantically to «save» you.

We're not at liberty to change what the Bible says about the morality of gay sex.

The claim that the housing policy issue was about «fairness» and that «several» gay couples lived off - campus at the time with significantly higher rental prices is certainly not my recollection.

Although there has been some push back on the new sex ed curriculum for public schools, which would see teaching about family diversity that includes LBGT families, anti-homophobia instruction including that being gay is normal, and — at long last!

As I write, the Coalition for Marriage petition against gay marriage has reached a total of 600,783 signatures and by the time this is in print, that total will be considerably higher - you can check its current level at http://c4m.org.uk/, and sign the petition while you are about it if you haven't already done so.

again and again at the poor dog, Justin says that most of the Christians in his life were «South Park» Christians who responded to his agonizing questions about his future with a flippant, «Don't be gay!»

Again, I don't think a gay relationship is a sin — I am proud to be a cat who wants to meow — but I wonder at times about people's intrusive concern with our sex lives.

Poor Bob is grasping at straws because he was too lazy to do his homework on this subject to know about the studies that showed being gay is NOT a mental disorder that changed the experts opinions.

So at least this guy knows there are things like automobiles and electricity and gay rights, but aside from that he's still pushing a 1500 year old philosophy about unknown people and special beings in the clouds.

I knew a few people people at Chick - Fi - La that were gay, but they never complained about Chick - Fi - la's stance agianst gay issues.

The queer thing — by which she means the odd thing — about the people at New Hope is that their identity is not that of gays who have become heterosexual but that of gays who are now ex-gays.

Like many social conservatives, especially Christian ones, I spend a lot of my time reading and writing about religious freedom, especially how it might be affected by the legalization of same - sex marriage and the campaign for «gay rights» more generally.Yet at the same time, I harbor doubts about the position we are staking out.You see, I sometimes think that Justice Scalia's majority opinion in Employment Division v. Smith may have been correct.

Don't worry about the spelling, but how long did it take gays to be taken off the dsm and come to the point their at?

This I can not square away — however, I look at the gay issue much differently than most — I think it's much to complicated and we are jumping the gun by saying we just accept gay marriage — or it's an evil sin — what about the science that says testosterone starts forming around the babies brain when they are only 8 weeks into the womb?