ryn — i think the majority of americans with religious beliefs
about biblical creation have never actually been challenged to apply any critical scrutiny to those beliefs.
Not exact matches
They speak so much
about the Sovereign - God, but what
about the Creator - God, because many of them reject the
biblical account of
creation in favor of Darwinism.
The purpose of the volume, according Harold Attridge, is to explore «the ongoing controversy in the United States
about the relationship between science and religion, particularly evolutionary biology and traditional readings of the
biblical creation story.»
What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part of
biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's ideal familial structure for husbands and wives, but not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy
about Ephesian women teaching in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same line of argumentation — appealing the
creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries more weight than «submit one to another»; why the laws of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant in one moment, but important enough to display in public courthouses and schools the next; why a feminist reading of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is not; why the curse of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender relationships rather than the new
creation that began at the resurrection.
Contemporary environmentalists transform Francis's
biblical piety
about God's
creation into a prototype of their worship of a quite different god, Gaia.
From him, as from Father, I heard nothing, so far as I recall,
about a conflict between
biblical creation and Darwinian evolution.
Nygren gives an important suggestion
about the history of doctrine when he says that the Church Fathers were saved from falling completely into a Greek pattern of thought by the three
biblical assertions of
Creation, Incarnation, and Resurrection.32 But rather than conclude, as Nygren does, that these themes require us to reject all metaphysics, why not say that they require us to reconsider our metaphysics?
I was asking good questions, worthy questions —
about creation, science,
biblical interpretation, gender, religious pluralism, heaven and hell — but I was angry with those not asking these questions along with me; I wanted to force them into my season.
Our survey question
about the «most important» way that theology meets science offered three options: theology 1) gives meaning, 2) defends the
biblical account of
creation or 3) provides ethics.
To summarize, to literalize the apocalyptic passages in the New Testament, is to run counter to all we know of astronomy and the world of space; they are tied in with the then - current Jewish eschatology and Persian dualism which saw evil in command of
creation; as commonly accepted, they encourage passivity
about the evils of the present world; they emphasize only one side of the message of Jesus to the exclusion of essential elements; they are grounded at least in part on a misconstruction of
biblical poetry and drama.
The
biblical view, by contrast, considers
creation fundamentally good; it takes a positive view of the natural order and is concerned
about events within history.
The concern for theology, not as a particularist discipline but as the search for human wisdom
about the wisdom of God in the
creation and redemption of man, is manifest in other disciplines besides
Biblical studies: in systematic theology frequently, occasionally in Christian ethics, homiletics, religious education and pastoral counseling.
Only when the great minds were liberated from the
biblical accounts of
creation and the controls and censures of ecclesiastical authorities were they able to make a qualitative leap in scientific progress, bringing
about the un-fettered birth of modern science.
My experiences with raising questions
about religious pluralism, heaven and hell,
biblical inerrancy, and the
creation account have not been pleasant ones to say the least.
It was a controversial interpretation for many, as it contradicted religious beliefs
about human origins; the short, stocky limb bones and the skull's oversized brow suggested an ape - like ancestor that did not fit in with the
biblical idea of God's
creation.
Our writers can help you produce an original essay which will talk not only
about the theories of Darwin,
Biblical story of
creation, Continue reading
Christians should think
about resource conservation and pollution mitigation; it is, after all, Christian to exercise careful
Biblical dominion over the entire
Creation that God has bequeathed to -LSB-...]
About Blog BioLogos invites the church and the world to see harmony between science and
biblical faith as we present an evolutionary understanding of God's
creation.