I do not see anyone other than you even talk
about big bang theory and now you accuse someone else of not knowing it from evolution.
It's amazing that people know
about big bang theory that explans how the universe began.
How would a person living in a desert know these things without actually someone telling him this?!!! And who is that someone?!!! No one at that time knew anything
about big bang theory?!! The actual translation of the arabic word رتقا is it was like a fabric that got torn apart?!!! Isn't that big bang?!! And the other part that was proven too is that everything alive needs water to live?!!! How did they know that then?!!! Islam and science support each other and science only getting to prove things now which was mentioned 1500 years ago in the Quran!!!
Here's another one: An entirely natural wormhole opened in the space - time continuum, and a guy from the present got sent into the past, and told someone
about the Big bang theory, and that story made it into the Quran.
We talked
about the big bang theory in which life started on earth.
Not exact matches
There was an article recently
about a young boy (12ish) who is the new math genius in the making and he is working on debunking the
big bang theory with science.
When we are talking
about living beings and the world we live in which is so perfectly designed, there is no possible way this is all random and happened by a «
big bang theory» which actually requires something to initiate a
big bang to begin with.
I'm well versed in the scientific method and that has led me to believe that «
big bang theory» is
about as supportable as the «flat earth
theory» of the 16th century.
Honestly I'm not sure the
big bang theory is the answer to how everything began, and I wonder
about it all the time.
I am not as high profile as you but if I were, it would be like me telling you not to teach your kids
about evolution or the
big bang theory.
I know that i have prayed and things changed for the good and i have learned that faith requires a courage that atheist just don't have, so now you atheist can start your shallow explanations
about how you can think for yourselves and your laughable
big bang theories and your evolved from monkeys nonsense and i'll just stay with truth.
What
about pure science or theoretical physics (as opposed to merely experimental physics — I was reminded of the deep significance of that distinction from watching THE
BIG BANG THEORY)?
Far more proof has been presented scientifically
about evolution and the
big bang theory than by believing in a god.
All you did was spout some quantum
theory about virtural particles then said it proves god was the cause of the
big bang.
Quantum Mechanics is WAY weirder and more complex than, say, evolution (though I like how you threw the
big bang in there — separate
theories, dude), but you won't really hear any religious nuts complaining
about the exact same process that gives us QM because it doesn't conflict with their ancient mythology.
Since then, the Steady State
Theory has been disproven, and the
Big Bang Theory has been shown to be correct, vindicating a form of «Creationism», which not only explains «let there be light» (the early universe was dominated by radiation — light), but explains of separation of light and darkness — the decoupling era, about 300,000 earth years after the big bang, when the universe cooled below the ionization energy of hydrogen, allowing it to become transparent for the first ti
Big Bang Theory has been shown to be correct, vindicating a form of «Creationism», which not only explains «let there be light» (the early universe was dominated by radiation — light), but explains of separation of light and darkness — the decoupling era,
about 300,000 earth years after the
big bang, when the universe cooled below the ionization energy of hydrogen, allowing it to become transparent for the first ti
big bang, when the universe cooled below the ionization energy of hydrogen, allowing it to become transparent for the first time.
PDX — It doesn't take a Genius to realize from my statements that i have read things other than the Bible you moron i have spent many hours reading and listening to scientists
about their
theories on the
big bang, i have listened to ideas from the most revered scientists including Hawking and others, and they all admit that there are holes in their
theories, that nothing fully explains their
big bang theory, the physics doesn't add up let alone the concept, there are plenty of scientists hard at work trying to make the numbers fit and the
theory hold weight but if you ask any of them they can not give you the answers and the reason being... there are none, the
theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws of Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will be judged.
Investigate the evidence yourself, there is nothing at all that truly suggests that the
Big Bang happened, the only thing they have used in order to come up with the
theory is that in their observances, the Universe appears to be expanding from a central point, it doesn't prove that a
Big bang occurred, we know so little
about the universe, that we don't even know everything
about our own world, and you really believe that our science has figured out the riddle to the beginning of the Universe?
that their religion is flawed somehow... and when questioned why they try to push their ideas on everybody else, they get frustrated and say that it's the Religious ones that push their ideas on people... NOT THEM... That's funny because i have
about 1000 comments on this thread that state the opposite... Atheist's i see on this post appear to fall into that category of people that need to try and convince others to believe what they do because they're not sure in their own beliefs... They know that believing in the
big bang theory or other similar
theories takes as much faith as any religion has to offer... and when pinned down to the facts that By the laws of physics... the
big bang couldn't happen....
Some listeners may remember that there was an old cosmological
theory about an oscillating universe where the idea was that the
big bang sort of threw the universe — it outward expanded outward, but at some point, gravity would cause everything to slow down and then it would start to collapse again.
The
theory, the most widely held cosmological idea
about the growth of our universe after the
big bang, accounts for a number of mysteries, including why the universe is surprisingly flat and smoothly distributed.
There should be, if our ideas
about the early history of the universe [i.e., the
big bang theory] are correct.
u «Three years ago, observations of distant, exploding stars blew to smithereens some of astronomers» most cherished ideas
about the universe [the
big bang theory].
«It clearly took a while after that primordial explosion for clouds of gas to congeal into a form dense enough for stars and quasars to ignite, and the Sky Survey is already prompting astronomers to question some of the assumptions
about how that process unfolded [i.e, the
big bang theory].»
big bang theory, the on cbs — has
big bang theory, the news, listings, dvds, episode guides and more for
big bang theory, the A woman who moves into an apartment across the hall from two brilliant but socially awkward physicists shows them how little they know
about life outside
The
Big Bang theory isn't
about the
bang itself but
about what happened after the
bang.
That's it; it doesn't say any gobbledegook
about equipartitions of energy or gravity, or Einstein's
theory of relativity; either special or general, or QED, or Maxwell's equations, or even the
big bang.