More and more church groups seem to be feeling a bit guilt - stricken
about blanket condemnation of homosexuality and especially of homosexual persons.
Not exact matches
If as you say, «two wrongs [don't] make a right argument» then why not debate @Blarg's statement instead of inciting atheists
condemnation of his / her arguments by indirectly making a
blanket statement
about how Atheist should be offended?
The analysis focuses on the ELA components of the standards, but what it says
about the assumptions driving them and how they were constructed is important: «The
blanket condemnation made by the CCSS authors that school reading texts have «trended downward over the last half century» is inaccurate» — particularly so, the authors of the study found, in the K - 3 grades.
======================================================== First I second everything you say
about a need to directly attack global squalor rather than taking to the pulpit to make
blanket condemnations of one's fellow man and conjuring Doom by greenhouse effect.
I agree with you
about the types of objectives you're seeing, but not with a
blanket condemnation of objectives.