Sentences with phrase «about by other reviewers»

Not exact matches

Talk about management by committee: one group of more than 800 scientist authors to cope with more than 9,000 scientific publications on climate change and more than 20,000 comments from «expert reviewers» (plus another 30,000 or so from various other interested parties.)

Very little of the problems raised by the peer reviewers (as well as by Torlakson and Michael Kirst, who chairs the Golden State's board of education, in their own letter to the administration about the plan) was mentioned by any of the Beltway players and other policy gurus commenting last week about the Obama Administration's decision.

Now, other reviewers have weighed in — and most are enthusiastic about the idiosyncratic 1,100 page doorstop with more than 200 essays by contemporary writers and academics, including novelist Walter Mosley writing on what it means to be «hardboiled,» novelist Mary Gaitskill on why Norman Mailer moves her, and humorist Sarah Vowell on «American Gothic» and kitsch.

In the case of Amazon, they rank their reviewers with a complex algorithm which factors in the amount of reviews made, the frequency that reviews are made, the quality (helpfulness) of reviews made as deemed by others as well as a myriad of other complex little elements which the rest of us will probably never know about.

Great story about love, grief, and what we are willing to risk for others (Michele N.) Hepworth writes with compassion and understanding of the impact of this cruel disease on all who know and love the patients (Helen S.)(Reviewed by BookBrowse First Impression Reviewers).

I don't know if this was specific to my handset or something experienced by other reviewers, but it was certainly unexpected, given the specs and price of the PRIV, and it occurred often enough for me to make a mental note about it and include it in my review.

The idea of there being scientists on the one hand, opposed by irrational sceptics on the other has been established so concretely that few editors, peer - reviewers or journalists even bother to ask questions about the content of the consensus, much less about how it is contradicted by the substance of climate sceptics» arguments.

Just as the secret ballot system relies on anonymity to prevent individuals from being pressured by others during the act of voting, the peer review system depends on anonymity to prevent reviewers from having to think about how their statements would be viewed by a much larger audience — an audience for which the review is not intended in the first place.