«Unless you commercialize it, it's not going to contribute,» Kellie Caught of the World Wildlife Fund - Australia said
about carbon capture technology needed to reduce coal plant emissions.
Not exact matches
As
technologies to
capture carbon improve, some are already thinking
about what we will do with all that CO2.
Coal companies should take a proactive strategy and talk
about solutions, such as
carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS)
technology, Reavey said.
Your otherwise informative «Instant expert» article
about new
technologies for
carbon capture (2 April) missed some important numbers.For instance, how...
He said operational costs need to fall to
about $ 100 per ton of
captured carbon for the
technology to be scalable.
In 2005, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change published a report on
carbon dioxide
capture and storage that was enthusiastic
about the possibilities of such
technology, but downbeat on prospects for adoption given the cost.
Most analyses use models that have very optimistic assumptions
about the implementation of
carbon pricing globally and the availability of key
technologies like
carbon capture and storage.
I still think this 2010 paper by Howard J. Herzog at the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology very nicely lays out what to look for to gauge if countries are serious
about this issue: «Scaling up
carbon dioxide
capture and storage: From megatons to gigatons.»
As POWERnews reported, the ministry in 2010 expressed concerns
about possible health and environmental risks related to amine
technology and had evaluated alternative solutions to
capture carbon from the refinery's existing catalytic cracker facility and adjacent CHP plant.
POWER's Editor Interviewed
About Carbon Capture and Sequestration In November 2015, POWER Editor Gail Reitenbach gave a luncheon keynote presentation at the Carbon Management Technology Conference on SaskPower's Boundary Dam 3 carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) p
Capture and Sequestration In November 2015, POWER Editor Gail Reitenbach gave a luncheon keynote presentation at the
Carbon Management
Technology Conference on SaskPower's Boundary Dam 3
carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) p
capture and sequestration (CCS) project.
But there are important questions
about feasibility, say the authors, given that
carbon capture and storage
technology does not exist on a large scale.
While there is a lot of skepticism over so - called «clean coal»
technologies, which look to
capture and store
carbon emissions, a major government and industry initiative is
about to take a small step closer to testing some of that controversial and cutting - edge
technology.
The standard (
about 1,000 pounds of CO2 for every megawatt - hour of electricity produced) would be tough for prospective coal plants to meet without incorporating new
technologies like
carbon capture and storage (CCS).
In operating the
technology that
captures carbon, the power plant gobbles up
about 20 to 30 percent more energy, so efficiency is typically lost.
Since then, events have told a rather different story, with the U.S. waging a multi-front campaign — organizing a global network of bilateral agreements designed to render the U.N. climate process «irrelevant», sending out its flacks to argue that fossil
technologies like «clean coal» and
carbon capture are the best ways forward, insisting that the under - funded climate secretariat separate its Kyoto Protocol accounts from those related to the Framework Convention, ruthlessly undermining all attempts to talk
about, or even talk
about talking
about, the future of the regime.
However, a substantial tax might also bring
about the widespread introduction of
carbon capture and storage
technology, which might enable a new wave of investment in coal - fired generation.
While there are questions
about biofuels» ability to reduce
carbon, combining
carbon capture technology and biomass electricity generation could be a winner (Source: BP)