Sentences with phrase «about chances created»

Think you are talking about chances created.

Not exact matches

So maybe Ford took some chances, creating spots in which McConaughey just kind of meanderingly freestyles his way through various quasi-philosophical musings about Lincoln and the meaning of life (it's all been compared to his «True Detective» character).

Park's announcement about the smartwatch two months ahead of time meant that most outside software developers haven't had a chance to create apps for it yet (software tools are coming for them next month).

«If you aren't talking with your employees about pay, chances are that they're talking to each other and creating their own story of what [the company's] compensation policy is,» said Bach.

«It is all about creating a different experience at the store by giving people a chance to get our colorful and surprising collections while having fun!»

So chances are, if you have a tangible product, you should be thinking about how you can create unboxing videos to connect with your audience.

it's a random mesh of genetics that create offspring (children) and that is all left to chance about how they will look and function in our current enviroment.

Is even the Machiavellian project proto - historicist insofar as it's all about creating a world governed by human control — or not chance and necessity?

I believe that no one does the math — the logic of math is in favour of creation over evolution — «random chance» aka evolution is mathematically to astounding to believe — Alfred Hoyles number don't lie... and dna is a code — random chance can not create a code sequence nor can random chance ever improve itself... just think about it — mathmatically speaking there is a god or creator or creators of the code for life.

But I think that to go on to create life without intervening (ie place the right chemicals within lipid bubbles to create cells) may require a ton of random chance, and could take a lab the size of the ocean, and about a half a billion years to work.

If it is a guess, the chances that it will be correct is 1/10, 000 and the probability of all the three guesses i.e. the earth is spherical, light of moon is reflected light and everything is created from water being correct is 1/30 x 1/2 x 1/10, 000 = 1/60, 000 which is equal to about.0017 %.

Created by chance, they have no place in the normal and orthodox evolution of astral matter; with the exasperating result that we know nothing for certain about the existence or frequency of occurrence of planets outside the solar system.

According to him, eternity isn't about escaping Earth for a church service in the sky — it's about creating a new Earth that everyone will have a chance to participate in.

Here is my evil plan — Create a fictional character, have him born into poverty in a part of the world full of strife with no recorded history, cast some doubts on his conception (that will keep them guessing), leave a decade or so gap in his life story, re-introduce him in the middle of nowhere and tell everyone he has all these amazing powers, he confounds and confuses all his followers and tells them not to tell anyone about what he does or where he is going and Oh yeah, they are all prostiitutes and tax cheats and lepers and the really lowlifes of society, deny them the chance to follow him, set him at odds with both the government and the church powers of his time, cast doubts on his seexuality and intelligence, make it so he refuses anyone to come to his aid and kill him in the most horrible way imaginable, then hide his body, make it so nothing he does can be historically proven.

As a mama of two it is a mission I am passionate about so I jumped at the chance to create some recipes that I knew my kids loved and other families could would be excited about making.

I don't care about that as long as he scores or create chances.

Picture this, if we had a quick, agile defender alongside kos, our full backs would have the freedom to bombard forward without worrying about covering for a slug at the back.Same if we had a big strong athletic dmf like gustavo, our midfield midgets would be free to move forward and create chances knowing that there is someone reliable protecting the back four.But then again this can only happen in my dreams or on FIFA manager

I do not understand the predictability that people be moaning about... the only predictability I know of is that Arsenal will create more than 4 goal - scoring chances every game... but they won't score.

I wrote about how important he was in their team a while ago, he's the one starting their attacks like Wilshere, rosicky has done for us when they played, he creates many chances with his one - twos and direct dribbling from the center.

I wonder whether some guys here watch other EPL matches apart from Arsenal to see how many chances other teams create in a match.U will rant about Giroud who is not helping the team either but even with a big name like Cavani, Arsenal will still struggle.And bragging about a midfield that is failing to make those through passes and beat defenders also shows a little football brain.

These include his fantastic ratio of converting chances and his creating of chances for other players as well, so do not let any negative thoughts about Arsenal's new forward bother you Gooners.

If we were serious about this competition, we would have played atleast one of Cazorla, Alexis, Ozil in the starting lineup to have some creativity that would create chances.

RKW, you must not have seen the piece about Bellerin being the most creative player in the entire league ahead of Cazorla and Ozil, he created six clear cut chances.

One thing i hate about wenger is the the old man doesn't substitute player at 60 mins or seventy, to create chance for squad rotation and keeping the energy level and also helping other players pick form in other to improve competition in our game, you see, that is where it hurts, man!

«I was not worried about that as I knew that would not last forever with the number of chances we create.»

The problems so far have been about creating chances, finishing them, carelessness in possession, having all our play restricted through the middle (Ramsey on the wing anyone?)

I thought about it for a second and every time I used to have an argument with someone who loves Giroud as much as Wenger does, they always told me that if more chances where created, Giroud would be a hell of a lot more consistent than he his....

i am not too bothered by the manner we won today the most important thing is the 3 pts remember burnley beat liverpool not so long ago, also for the people who thought the title was already lost after just a few games (which by the way was stupid to think) well not only man city got beaten but their team looked jaded / tired and even though they have a very good squad they missed de bruyne terribly, it is not the same team without him they couldn, t create any chances which is good news, it can, t be good for a team to depend so much on one player (we should know a thing or two about this) in case he gets injured hopefully we have moved on from this and can deal with injuries to our players in case it happens to us, we had our fair share and it is time for us and to watch other teams getting depleted, COYG.

If your not an Arsenal fan, you may say Ozil should be happy then, his chances are being converted, but we Gunners know that to be false, in fact our profligacy in front of goal is abysmal, right now roughly 1 out of every 8 chances Ozil creates is converted, now that doesn't make for great reading, but it gets even worse when you think about it deeper.

I was not really worried about Liverpool taking the lead, my only worry was Arsenal converting their chances as I knew before the game that we will create plenty.

Reinforces my statement about us not being up to the mark in terms of goalscoring to be champions, homegame where we barely created a chance.

What chance are they creating, what balance does he keep talking about between attack and defence, because were poor in attack and defence.

Yes the Whole team played like Pants in the Monaco game but it WAS GIROUD that flopped up big time... Its all about scoring goals — he didn't put away decent chances (which was created by who — the rest of the guys)..

I tell you from a footballing point of view scoring 8 goals you got have players that know where the goal posts are it takes energy and creativity to score 8 yes I agree vikings changed their players because their league is starting i think tomorrow so yes they were not a big team team but to say that Arsenal were not strong thats a bit to much and I say it again you need energy and creativity to score 8 I was very happy they did that Arsenal are well known for creating chances yesterday they converted them chances into Goals this should be the norm and I hope this will give them a lesson on how to win a game as they did nt dwell about with the ball it was goal after goal and that tells me that they went for the goals directly and I hope and wish the young guns all the best and to do well in the next season

Very good point also about Ozil, and Arsenal in general, only creating chances, and looking better as a whole, once the pressure is off.

«Welbeck isn't as talented but what you've got to do against a back three is move them about to create chances, while Lacazette is our best finisher and sulky Sanchez doesn't like playing out wide.

If we consider that Benteke is as prolific as Giroud does, then I doubt about Benteke's link up ability to open and create chances to other Arsenal players.

I understand that this is the starting lineup Ospina Debuchy — Per - Calum - Gibbs Arteta — Flamini Ox - Ramsey — Campbell Giroud The thing about this lineup that worries me is, who will create the scoring chances and where will the goals come from?

I thought people here were debating about two or three seasons back why he should be our top striker.When I thought the Monaco match was the icing on the cake to show how average he was it seems just like Wenger we» will never learn our lesson.Now people our okay with him being a super sub which is debatable.Giroud was a super sub in games last season because he wasn't played when he was supposed to.He's not your ideal super sub because he very hardly creates but rather requires people to create for him.Most of the time super subs are the one's who tend to create the chances and open up spaces in the opposition defence.West ham are ready to pay and hence we should demand more from them.We can then use the money from his sale on far better players.Given the same seasons, time and chances a lot of average strikers can do better than what he did.This is because Arsenal create a lot of chances and it just needs someone who can finish.Goodbye!.

Giroud was bought for 10mil, how about you aim a little of the blame / expectation the way of our 42.5 mil «best # 10 on the planet», or our 140k a week ST dynamo who played over half an hour and wasn't spotted, or at our entire midfield dynamic whose job it is to create chances for our ST to finish off.

and please do not go about saying Ozil has 18 assist and he is only there to create chances, in the position he plays he should be contributing at least 15 — 18 goals, i had sanchez getting us at least 20 goals last season but i do not hear anybody on sanchez case, i would not even speak about Walcott and the others.

And it is a quality that Arsenal can not afford to lose, so how about Wenger giving him another Arsenal striker to create chances for?

That is why I think Wenger was so cheesed off about the4 foul because if Arsenal had got the opener, and we did create a fair few chances, things may have been very different.

Theo averages about a goal a game and his movement alone enables arsenal to create the sort of chances that they normally wouldn't with any other player.

I find it so difficult to care about which players we keep which players we should buy if we will be able to qualify for CL football etc because I am truly convinced only a new manager would create a real chance of change at the club.

Everyone goes on about Ozil's amazing assist record, but let's be fair, if our players had converted even a quarter of the other chances he created we would be well clear in the League and Ozil would already have smashed Henry's assist record.

While a lot of Arsenal fans, myself included, have been a bit concerned of late about the lack of chances that the Gunners have been creating, the fact that we still have not lost in the Premier League since the first game of the season and that we got our title challenge back on track with the win over Bournemouth on Sunday should be some comfort.

pretty please, its true stats don't lie but it could be manipulated to tell different stories, the simple fact and bottoml line is Ozil created over 190 chances and ONLY 19 was put away by our misfiring duo of Giroud and Walcott, and the fact he had half of the season to match and eclipse the assist record and failed says more about Giroud's and Walcott woeful woeful finishing abilities and nought whatsoever to do with Ozil, am can only do so much, what's next, blame him for number of goals we conceded?

There aren't many reliable objective facts when it comes to Ozil — but knock out the emotional stuff and the diversionary fluff about body language etc and the bare numbers tell us he isn't lazy, he touches the ball more than any other Arsenal player, re-cycles and passes it better than any, is surer in possession and creates more chances.

We as the Arsenal need to do our part in becoming a place where the highest dreams of players are realized, even if we don't always win trophies, we need to at least always have a «Genuine» fighting chance, Real Madrid went a number of seasons chasing La Decima, spent loads of cash, played second fiddle to Barca for a few seasons even but still players still dreamed of playing for them in that period, we as fans need to grow up too and stop bitching and whining especially about our players, we create a toxic atmosphere for these guys when we do so and it doesn't help nobody, little wonder our players perform better away than they do at home.