Sentences with phrase «about changes in the law»

Writing to Culture Secretary Maria Miller, who unveiled the planned legislation on Tuesday, Lady Warsi raises a series of questions about the change in the law.

Ask your attorney about the changes in the law that affect you.

The Ministry of Energy and Mines claims that reducing the environmental requirements — weakening the country's environmental framework - will promote investment in the country, but environmental campaigners point out that key stakeholders such as civil society, indigenous peoples, and academics should be consulted about changes in laws that would affect forests and community lands - such as the proposed elimination of environmental impact assessments.

That means clients will call, people will come up to you at conferences, in court or even at the grocery store and tell you that they liked your blog post, or that they appreciated your Twitter posts about a change in the law that affected their business.

One of the important ways we serve British Columbia lawyers here at CLEBC is by keeping them informed about changes in the law, both large and small.

Naomi has always combined her case work with involvement with family policy, working to bring about changes in law and practice that she can see from her cases are necessary.

You might want to educate them about changes in the law, alert them to news that might affect them, or let them know about events your firm is hosting.

Speak out about changes in laws and policies that impact children and families.

We're also going to have our internal counsels addressing a number of boards and associations and have started providing courses in Competition Law, about changes in that law.

Not exact matches

University of Toronto «s Colleen Flood, the Canada Research Chair in Health Law and Policy, explains what's standing in the way of health care reform, and why the business community may be our best bet for bringing about change.

Related: What Entrepreneurs Need to Know About the Historic Change in General Solicitation Law That Goes Into Effect Sept. 23

«The good thing about laws is if they don't exist and you want one — or if they exist and you don't like them — you can change them,» Levandowski told students at the University of California, Berkeley in December.

As a business how we get money from our customers says a lot about us and I have no doubt that in time the laws will change around auto - renewal because they need to.

If the financial connection to China, a country whose government typically opposes transparency and political dissent, seems problematic, Hwang isn't concerned: «If anything, we are informing the public about upcoming changes in laws as well as the decision makers behind it, emboldening affected parties to act up and speak up if necessary,» he said.

However, CBO estimates much of that increase is due to expectations about future changes in law.

Access free resources to help you learn about the changes taking place in mortgage laws and regulations that will become part of Ellie Mae solutions and services.

About 20 students have launched «Never Again MSD,» a group that will push for changes in gun laws.

Expected to be more politically active and socially conscious, this new generation of young people are fired up about changing laws, ending violence and prejudice, and screaming loudly in the name of social justice.

There is much that could be said about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at about the 2 minute mark: When atheists insist that atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf of atheism, ridicule religion and religious believers in the name of atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination of religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of atheism, they prove that their atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is false, disingenuous, and (as far as I can tell) useless for anything but giving atheism rhetorical cover from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.

So far Rush has been wrong about everything from womans reproductive rights, endangered species, climate change, how laws and bills are actually passed in congress, drugs, alcohol, gay marriage, marriage (what is he on now his 5th?)

How do you feel about the recent changes in law that makes every Canadian an organ donor unless they specifically state otherwise?

There are a few main explanations: 1) long term failure in leadership by the Irish Catholic church, and connected with this, the awful Jansenist culture; 2) Europe — or rather, political interference from European Community institutions; 3) American money; 4) the claim of the «Yes» campaign that the Referendum was won by «the stories,» that is, the constant appeal to emotion and the complete refusal actually to think about the legal consequences of passing such a change not merely into law, but also into the Irish Constitution, the foundation of that law.

People refusing medical treatment because they think they can pray disease away, The demoralizing way religion makes you feel about yourself (I am a wretch, a sinner, a bad person by nature), the religious wars that have been fought for millenia, the self righteous passing laws based on THEIR beliefs (change to the pledge of allegience which now excludes anyone who does not believe in a fairy godfather, the change to the national motto that turned it into the lie «in god we trust», the bigotry that «my religion is the right one and you are wrong so I'll pray for you» kind of crap... don't you realize that it is insulting to me when someone says they will pray for me... its the same as saying I'm going to do something for you but there won't be any effect, so it is just a waste of time.

Mention of that great saint brings to mind what he said about change: he sharply cautioned against changing law — any law — even when some improvement is possible, unless there is some «urgent necessity or substantial and obvious benefit», since «the mere fact of change in law itself can be adverse to the public welfare and lessen the restraining power of the law».

With the change of scientific vision in the present century there has come about a very radical change in the method of science, its being less a description of phenomena and the formulation of universal laws, and more a statistical formulation of probabilities and a venture in determining which of the many probabilities might be taken to be true to fact in this situation.

Dr Peter Saunders, the campaign director explained the decision: «The judges» ruling was really pretty emphatic... there's been over ten attempts to change the law in British parliament in the last 15 years but all have failed because of concerns about public safety and the ramifications for vulnerable people».

There may also be a reference to the Jewish leaders, whether in Jesus» time or later, who viewed their function only as preserving the law rather than bringing about change.

It's time to think about what the change in the law means: what are the implications for churches?

Many among the Founders had fled the oppressive monarchies of Europe precisely because they were not given the religious freedom to worship as they pleased, and more importantly, to bring about social change in accordance with God's law.

Also, what was that about that verse the jesus dude said about not changing a word in the law till heaven and earth pass or whatever?

When believers stop saying stupid things in public and stop trying to change laws because of their books - of - stupidity, atheists won't have much to talk about.

see what you have to understand about living in a real world — a world where god is just a story and not real — its a world based on scientific and physical laws that are proven to exist and their effects are measurable... us as humans, mere animals, hold no real power or control aside thru ingenuity which allows us to change our environment to suit us... stay with me here... at this point in human history we ceased to change to suit our environment and started changing it to suit us — thats destruction of the earth to suit one species — that should go over well...

Cindi, There is also much that has to be discerned about the book of remembrance, the so called OT, and this NT, that I call the (Not True), book, for it does not fulfilled the OT book, it changes the laws of life, as prophesied in Isaiah 24:1 - 5, and YHWH says He changes not in Malachi 3:6, and He also teaches us in this book that He does nothing without His servants the prophets, in Amos 3:7, so that we are not consumed, (lied to).

It seems that when teams of doorstep canvassers are sent out to chat with thousands of residents about same - sex marriage, swift and durable change occurs in the opinions on that issue held by subjects who chatted with a gay canvasser whose script told him to say that he'd really like to get married but the law won't allow it.

People, there is also much that has to be discerned about the book of remembrance, the so called OT, and this NT, that I call the (Not True), book, for it does not fulfilled the OT book, it changes the laws of life, and is why we today have so much confusion of what is right, and of what is wrong, as prophesied in Isaiah 24:1 - 5, and YHWH says, He changes not in Malachi 3:6.

The tithe has changed a little bit in the New Testament, but notice that Abram is tithing long before any law about tithing was giving.

According the author, there is a lack of discussion about Whitehead's view that scientific laws state principles which are immanent in nature but which evolve concurrently with novel changes in the entities actually constituting the universe.

PDX — It doesn't take a Genius to realize from my statements that i have read things other than the Bible you moron i have spent many hours reading and listening to scientists about their theories on the big bang, i have listened to ideas from the most revered scientists including Hawking and others, and they all admit that there are holes in their theories, that nothing fully explains their big bang theory, the physics doesn't add up let alone the concept, there are plenty of scientists hard at work trying to make the numbers fit and the theory hold weight but if you ask any of them they can not give you the answers and the reason being... there are none, the theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws of Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will be judged.

Debates about this will easily generate much more heat than light unless the energy of both sides is focused on the right question, which is: «Given that 200,000 abortions a year is far too many, how can a deliverable change in the law most effectively reduce that number?»

We are extremely blessed in this country to have such a reputable and highly acclaimed organisation who are proactive in bringing about change in the labelling laws and ensuring consumers get what they pay for when it comes to certified organic in all aspects.

In this case, Barcelona benefitted from the stretching of the game brought about by the change in the offside law that effectively made an offside trap impossible to employ as a consistent tactiIn this case, Barcelona benefitted from the stretching of the game brought about by the change in the offside law that effectively made an offside trap impossible to employ as a consistent tactiin the offside law that effectively made an offside trap impossible to employ as a consistent tactic.

[Note: Because every person's situation is different, and because the law frequently changes, is not clearly established, or is interpreted in different ways by different courts, you should not rely on the information presented herein for legal advice about your specific situation.

Entitled «Healthy Food Fuels Hungry Minds: Serving Change in Public School Food,» the conference is cosponsored by Let's Talk About Food, the Massachusetts State Office of Nutrition and Health, the Harvard Food Law & Policy Clinic and the Harvard University Dining Services» Food Literacy Project.

I also wrote for the Times about: a frozen pizza that sneaks veggies into unsuspecting kids; changes ahead for junk food in school classrooms; why President Trump's eating habits are fair game for commentators; and a groundbreaking New Mexico law banning lunch shaming.

You must be talking about my brother - in - law - he's never changed a diaper in his life and doesn't plan to!

A blog about in - car safety, car seats, tips, reviews & advice from a mum on a mission to change the law and ra...

No, you don't have to do whatever your mother - in - law says, but what has changed about potty training in the last 40 years is that parents have been convinced it's something to be freaked out about, not that people used to beat their children until they were potty trained and now they don't.

McDonnell lobbied law makers in 2010 to change the rules for public schools, and she thinks it's about time the same happens for rec leagues.

The problem is that your in - laws, your friend, or your neighbor is telling you that something in the way you are doing things is wrong and must be changed... Here's the bottom line: if your child is getting enough sleep, you all are sleeping well, and the people who live in the home are happy with the way things are working out, then nothing needs to be fixed, regardless of what anyone else has to say about your family's sleeping situation (p. 14).

She uses empirical research conducted in Bolivia, Sweden, the US, India, and Canada to explore and theorize shifting conditions and strategies of social change, including the criminalization of dissent, new approaches to law by social movements, and broader theoretical questions about the transformative potential of law.