Sentences with phrase «about changes to the benefits»

Shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper tells the BBC's Andrew Marr Show that Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby was right to speak out about changes to the benefits system, describing the proposals as «immoral».

Not exact matches

The campaign undertaken to drive in more attention towards the company's website was a fairly local one with a slogan called «changing lives» and needed people to participate by messaging or emailing friends and letting them know about the campaign and its benefits.

These forward - looking statements include, among other things, statements about full - year 2018 guidance, project milestones, increased opportunities in the market, backlog, bids and change orders outstanding, target projects and revenue opportunity pipeline, to the extent these may be viewed as indicators of future revenues or profitability, the expected impacts of the F2G program and progress toward completing the proposed combination with CB&I and the anticipated benefits of that transaction.

Delta has changed its policy about bumping passengers off of flighs, and its customers stand to benefit.

The survey also reveals that millennials are just as concerned about their retirement support, with 77 % reporting that retirement benefits might prompt them to change jobs.

The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (Public Law 114 - 74; November 2, 2015), made some changes to Social Security's laws about claiming retirement and spousal benefits.

While no changes may ever be made — and most certainly none before 2017's tax deadline in a few weeks — it's a good time to review what might change with MID, who benefits from the measure at the moment, and a few basics about this tax cornerstone.

We believe that it will truly benefit the individual to continue learning about the ever - changing landscape of business cycles, trends, technology, domestic / foreign industries, and government policies.

However as time progressed and France began to understand what Bitcoin was all about, including the benefits it could give to the economy, they somewhat changed their stance on the currency.

Because the survey has been conducted over several years, researchers from the Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI) and Greenwald & Associates are able to trend results to gain an understanding of employees» changing perspective about their benefits over time.

The growing sector isn't known for its workplace benefits, but the industry says that's about to change.

These states would need to think hard about how to implement the change in a way that ensures those families still get the benefits they receive under the current income tax regime.

She should speak out against the climate change denial rampant in opposition circles and talk about the benefits of the carbon tax, the transition to renewable energy and her government's investments in public services and infrastructure.

If Canada wants to benefit from Asia's development and growth, and remain a relevant and important energy partner in Asia, we must «think big» about exporting to multiple countries within the Asia Pacific, and «think beyond» oil and natural gas to include all of Canada's energy related assets, particularly the renewable and clean technologies that will help Asia mitigate its own climate - change challenges.

Financials are likely to benefit as rising Bund yields should favor European Banks starting to lift from very oversold conditions, so much of what has been written about in the last few days remains key to focus on, and has not changed.

The introduction of a tax reform bill in late 2017 continues uncertainty about tax policy changes that, if implemented, could reduce the tax benefits of giving to a donor - advised fund.

Most Likely To Change Lives: Alise Wright with «The 24/7 Project» (While I was out of town, I missed Alis Write's big announcement about the 24/7 Project to benefit Nuru InternationaTo Change Lives: Alise Wright with «The 24/7 Project» (While I was out of town, I missed Alis Write's big announcement about the 24/7 Project to benefit Nuru Internationato benefit Nuru International.

While I'm not inclined to ascribe motive in this case and prefer to give Ham the benefit of the doubt that he holds his position because his conscience demands it, I think these folks bring up a good point about how we can become so heavily invested in a certain ideology that change comes at enormous cost.

Mention of that great saint brings to mind what he said about change: he sharply cautioned against changing law — any law — even when some improvement is possible, unless there is some «urgent necessity or substantial and obvious benefit», since «the mere fact of change in law itself can be adverse to the public welfare and lessen the restraining power of the law».

He observed «everything Benedict XVI said does not... change the fact that... the deviation of Western civilization from human values is on the verge of destroying it, and that Islamic civilization is about to re-emerge — to the benefit of the whole of humanity.

Rahn... Do i really need to back up what i think online... and you being the expert... why do nt you fully explain to me the state that the country is in... enlighten me... but you already know how far that will go... just as my attempt to change others mind's fell short... so will any others opinion... i have my mind made up for my own well founded reasons... all im saying is that spending all day protesting and postulating is of no benefit to anyone... going about your life and making things best for yourself is in the best interest of this country as a whole... I believe Adam Smith said it best... the best results come from one person doing whats best for himself and the team... not throwing a hissy fit

I could write a book about the benefits of leafy greens, but all I'll say now is that if you start adding 1 - 2 pounds (500g to 1 kg) of leafy greens to your diet every day, you'll see your life change for the better.

IBWSS UK promises to bring about a change in the industry by helping the on - premise and off - premise sector better understand the opportunities and benefits of private label, bulk and bottled in market wine and spirits.

IBWSS promises to bring about a change in the industry by helping the on - trade sector better understand the opportunities and benefits of bulk and bottled in market wine and spirits.

He has been a revelation; he said it would take him 6 months to change Arsenal's fitness regime / habits / psychology towards fitness and that the benefits wouldn't be seen until this happened, a couple of weeks ago we hit 4 injuries which is the lowest I have seen for 5 + years and now we are about to hit 0 (hopefully no injuries against liverpool) which I would have thought impossible last season.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

I know a lot of people have been hammering on about this change, and while it's true that some of this only comes with the benefit of hindsight, I'd like to point out I tweeted this before Barcelona ever scored:

the strange thing about that was he was the one player that seemed to benefit most from the formation change last season but arsenal sold him.

In this case, Barcelona benefitted from the stretching of the game brought about by the change in the offside law that effectively made an offside trap impossible to employ as a consistent tactic.

«Ridiculous» because other teams wanted it to benefit this rule change, and Mercedes objected to this change about the exact same reason they used it for!

then think about how that approach will work with your new, male, customers o STEP THREE: re-format your role in your own mind, by getting clear why it is very important that you sell these services to men (i.e. how this benefits the men, their children, the men's partners, the community, your agency) o STEP FOUR: change your «internal dialogue».

OK, it makes sense to think about changes to child benefit as having a negative affect on women's support for the Government.

Feedback from dads suggests the benefits of the course include: • increased confidence in their role as a dad • increased knowledge about how to look after their baby • learning how to support their partner during pregnancy and labour • learning how to improve their relationship after pregnancy • learning how to cope with a huge change in their lives.

And the promotion of «traditional» marriage will continue to make people unhappy, first because there is no such thing as «traditional» marriage — marriage has been changing since humans created the concept — and second because the model doesn't work for about half of us, probably more as many people stay married in name only just to get health benefits, etc..

These are the changes envisaged: • comprehensive new information about the changes produced and given to both parents • midwives encouraged to inform parents about registration — and the benefits of both parents» signing • the opportunity for fathers to register ante-natally in the health service records alongside the mother • training for registrars in the new way of engaging with both parents • community outreach to reach fathers as well as mothers • an «acknowledgement of paternity» event at the birth where father and mother could jointly sign a form.

These benefits include but are not limited to the power of the human touch and presence, of being surrounded by supportive people of a family's own choosing, security in birthing in a familiar and comfortable environment of home, feeling less inhibited in expressing unique responses to labor (such as making sounds, moving freely, adopting positions of comfort, being intimate with her partner, nursing a toddler, eating and drinking as needed and desired, expressing or practicing individual cultural, value and faith based rituals that enhance coping)-- all of which can lead to easier labors and births, not having to make a decision about when to go to the hospital during labor (going too early can slow progress and increase use of the cascade of risky interventions, while going too late can be intensely uncomfortable or even lead to a risky unplanned birth en route), being able to choose how and when to include children (who are making their own adjustments and are less challenged by a lengthy absence of their parents and excessive interruptions of family routines), enabling uninterrupted family boding and breastfeeding, huge cost savings for insurance companies and those without insurance, and increasing the likelihood of having a deeply empowering and profoundly positive, life changing pregnancy and birth experience.

We ended up getting together for lunch a couple of times so far, and we have used our combined might to make many great changes to our little room including a bulletin board to put up pictures of our babies and information about the benefits of breastfeeding to keep us motivated!

We've all heard about the benefits breastfeeding has for both mom and baby, but did you know breast milk is constantly changing to meet the needs of our children?

Think about one change you can make that will benefit your children or bring you closer to them, and then let Father's Day be a time when you make a strong resolution to be that dad going forward.

There are risks and they shouldn't be downplayed, but there are also benefits and to me an empowering birth would be one where you make the call after receiving the best information possible about each method of delivery and have ongoing good information and care as the situation changes.

You can help by educating mothers about how to succeed at balancing breastfeeding and work responsibilities, by educating employers about the needs of their working - mom employees and the benefits of offering a mother - friendly worksite, and by generating a change in culture and organizational policy and environments among employers, within workforces, and in child - care settings.

All the main parties have been guilty in recent years of negative mythologising about benefit claimants so let's hope all of Westminster wakes up to the fact that a change may be occurring.

The Government must give better and fuller guidance to tax credit and other benefit claimants about the circumstances in which they may still claim the child element of child tax credit or universal credit for a third or subsequent child born on or after 6 April 2017, says the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG).1 Previously announced changes to tax credits, universal credit and some other benefits which limit payment of the child element to no more than two children come into effect today (6 April).

But one senior lobbyist said while Private Member's Bills had their benefits, there were better ways to go about getting the law changed.

On the NHS, some were aware that proposed reforms were amended following a listening exercise, but there was continued confusion about how the changes were intended to benefit patients.

But there is nothing fair about Child Benefit changes that leave a single earner on # 45,000 losing thousands of pounds, while a family on # 80,000 gets to keep every penny.

They could change the eligibility rules for the Medicaid program, kicking about one million people off the roles, and increasing the uninsured rate from roughly 7 percent to 30 percent, or they could drastically cut benefits, eliminating covered items such as prescription drugs.

I am against the changes that the government is making to child benefit... The way they have gone about them has caused huge anxiety, particularly for mums who are staying at home while maybe their husbands are going out to work.»

Rules about entitlement to benefits such as income support, housing benefit and job seekers allowance may variously change at 16, 18, 22 or 25.

Labour is calling for the cut in capital gains tax (CGT) to be scrapped, saying it would give investors already making money about the same, on average, as the government had planned to take from disabled people under changes to benefits.