Lt. Gov. Kathy Hochul speaks
about child marriage laws during a cabinet meeting in the Red Room at the Capitol on Tuesday, Feb. 28, 2017 in Albany, N.Y. (AP Photo / Hans Pennink)
The ranking was compiled by the international charity Save the Children (STC), which released the index as part of a new report
about child marriage.
Not exact matches
Unless you're living in a society with arranged
marriages, however, this is much more
about your
children's choices than anything you can do for them as a parent.
But when it comes to non-autonomous
children, policy protects their rights to pursue happiness by promoting the truth
about marriage» encouraging a man and a woman to commit to each other permanently and exclusively so that any
children that their union produces will have access to the love and care of their mother and father.
This is not
about marriage, it is
about having as MANY Morman
children as possible.
What
about other, shall I call them «soft issues» or non-core issues like, family counseling, youth ministry,
childrens's ministry, community upliftment,
marriage support, involvement in local cahllenges facing our community, being the moral compass in our city, etc etc..
Is there a legal or practical purpose for the law to concern itself with a union like
marriage if it is not
about having
children / family life?
I don't know what God thinks, but to me if gay
marriage is
about family life and the possibility of raising
children (in other words a desire on the part of gays to be accepted into married life as it exists) then I think it is a good thing for the same reasons that I think hetero families are good and necessary.
To hold that same - sex
marriage is part of the fundamental right to marry, or necessary for giving LGBT people the equal protection of the laws, the Court implicitly made a number of other assumptions: that one - flesh union has no distinct value in itself, only the feelings fostered by any kind of consensual sex; that there is nothing special
about knowing the love of the two people whose union gave you life, whose bodies gave you yours, so long as you have two sources of care and support; that what
children need is parenting in some disembodied sense, and not mothering and fathering.
God is Redeeming Theology Bible & Theology Topics: All
About Eve,
children, control, Discipleship, faith, fear, life,
marriage, parenting
Indeed, I had a number of citations in my library
about the extreme damage caused to the
children of second
marriages (blended families, as I recall the term).
Perhaps there's a difference between teaching a
child (boy or girl) that sex can cause babies and disease, and should be reserved for committed, adult relationships, and telling them that sex outside of
marriage is «bad» without explaining what is bad
about it.
It is commonly argued that
marriage is no longer principally
about the procreation and the rearing of
children but that it centers instead on the companionship of the couple and the building of a household.
Information
about the training of professionals in private practice who treat
children, youth, and families can usually be obtained by writing the national, state or local office of the appropriate professional association of the particular counseling discipline: pastoral counseling, social work, clinical psychology, psychiatry,
marriage counseling.
Through his suffering he conquers sin and dispels our misery.12 In his mercy, Jesus frees us from sin and enables us to live in the freedom of God's
children.13 But it is important to understand that the freedom of God's
children is lived in harmony with the truth; it does not seek to subordinate truth to itself.14 This truth includes, obviously, the truth
about marriage revealed in Christ.
So the next time you hear a religious leader talk
about marriage,
children or abortion.
It is far more interested in speaking
about fossil fuels than the importance of traditional
marriage and the procreation of
children.
My own statements
about the way in which the decline of
marriage contributes to the difficulties facing the working class were singled out as suggesting that unmarried women with
children were somehow responsible — blaming the victim.
It is
about how you can continue (or start anew) to enhance the
marriage relationship even when the
children are grown and gone and you think you know all there is to know
about your spouse.
In Gall's case, this juxtaposition not only reduces philosophy and theology to mere «bluster,» thereby liberating us to act without thinking seriously; it suggests that none of the consequences that follow from, for example, the codification of same - sex
marriage — the redefinition of kinship, the irrevocable technologizing of human «reproduction,» further expansion of the «new eugenics,» deliberate creation of three - parent households, and least of all, the fate of
children conceived in this brave new world — even provoke questions of human import worth thinking seriously
about.
You allow them to simply talk
about the passages of life: divorce,
children leaving home, alternative
marriages, and the simple joy of finding a job.
Her images are of pregnancy, labor and delivery; she writes
about mothering both the infant and her daughter from a previous
marriage,
about taking a sick
child to the doctor.
We've become aware of how the workplace cuts into the parent -
child relationship, but we haven't thought enough
about what it does to
marriage.
How
about the more pragmatic factor that the law with regard to
marriage is for the sole purpose of addressing the special circu - mstances of the family unit which includes raising of
children.
Surely you know what, say, James Q. Wilson has written
about how strong
marriages help
children succeed in life, and how good
marriages are becoming less common among the poor.
Finally, how can I expect my
children to believe what I say
about God and
marriage if I do not believe or submit to what the Church teaches
about God and
marriage?
Believers need to learn
about the ways in which
marriage advances the emotional, social, and economic welfare of
children.
And it will remain, at bottom, a moral struggle:
about the dignity and value of human beings,
about the rights and responsibilities of women and men,
about the relationship between
marriage, sexuality, and the rearing of
children.
2/3 of African American babies are born out of wedlock, African - American men are absent while
children are slaughtering each other on the streets, and and some African - American Pastors are concerned
about Gay
Marriage?
Again,
marriage may be thought the ideal but there will be a strong motivation to ensure that young people have all the necessary information
about contraception because they may end up, fairly naturally, doing the «loving» bit first before they are ready to have
children.
We now live in a culture in which
about half of all
marriages end in divorce; in which nearly half of all
children spend part of their childhood in fatherless homes; in which women and men who put their families first are falling behind economically and professionally; in which many of the nation's youngest citizens are starving for parental time and attention, and often for basic material necessities.
But please, for the love, don't leave a
child and a community that was depending on you in a bind so you can make a point
about gay
marriage.
Give their
children clear moral direction, exercise control over sexual content in the media in the home, be honest and truthful
about the consequences of extra-marital sexual activity, uphold
marriage and emphasise the benefits of saving sexual activity for
marriage.
Jesus answered evenly, speaking important truth
about the earthbound nature of
marriage which will give way to the greater life promised to the
children of» the resurrection (that beautiful phrase, lost on those with no ears to hear).
For those of us with convictions
about waiting for the ideal situation of
child - rearing in the context of a
marriage, the options of passing our noses or tempers on to the next generation or participating in the beauty of adoption are, at least for now, off the table.
When
children do not share the values and attitudes of parents
about sexuality,
marriage, or family, parents feel they have failed.
We've lived for the last 3 - 4000 years with everything being
about the straights, their
children, their
marriage ceremonies, there problems living the married life in the suburbs, and on and on ad nauseum.
And if it is objected that
marriage is
about children, well lots of «straight»
marriages do not result in progeny, for various reasons, and those
marriages are not invalid, are they?
Hey black pastors how
about you focus on black on black violence, or blacks low graduation rates and low education, or the drug epidemic, or the fact that black men abandon their
children at a higher rate than other races... yeah ga. y
marriage should be a big issue... what a fvcking joke...
Oh, he'll post lies
about gay
marriages producing gay
children, but he can't cite a single credible, peer - reviewed study that shows any such thing.
While there surely is an economic dimension to
marriage,
marriage historically has primarily been
about bringing
children and parents together.
«Is the Minister aware that the recent guidelines of the House of Bishops state clearly that those who enter a same - sex
marriage, together with
children in their care, should be welcomed into the life of worshiping communities, and also that the Church of England is
about to begin a two - year process of structured conversations to explore the changing attitudes to human sexuality and their implications for the life of the church and its disciplines?»
(d) Supplying the couple with whatever information they may desire related to achieving a strong, satisfying
marriage relationship, including information
about sex, finances, in - laws,
children, planned parenthood, religion, and so forth.
Priests supposedly know more
about s * e * x,
marriage and raising
children.
Jennifer Roback Morse (chapter four) shows why the Church is right
about marriage: sociological data confirms that married people are happier, healthier and better off financially; the «outcomes» for their
children are also «far better».
When I was explaining to my
children recently that I was going to give a talk
about marriage, my six year old said «Great \ We're going to a wedding!»
When lapsed parents approach us to have their
child baptised, or lapsed couples for
marriage, it is very rare that this is done merely for social reasons — that they just want a party (I think on these occasions a priest may well have to make a stand — but only after he has ascertained that they would not be open to some teaching
about the Faith).
Parents may be worried
about a
child in another city whose
marriage is going through difficult times.
Do you ever get random thoughts
about life, God, theology, the Bible,
marriage,
child rearing, and monkeys?
Although there is ample evidence that married mothers and fathers play an irreplaceable role in the lives of their
children, the positive message
about marriage was not — and still is not — being told to those who need to hear it most.