Not exact matches
Now revered leaders of the community are accused of protecting
child predators and punishing the victims who dare to speak out
about what was done to them, all to avoid outside involvement.
Bob complains
about name calling after repeatedly calling gay folk
child predators, Nazis, and chumps.
He also talks
about his more - than - decade - long fight for the
Child Victims Act to protect
children by forcing
predators into the open.
However in a zoo, even though it is a small area, the bear has protection against any natural
predators, he's being fed everyday, he has his «own space» (like you and I in our houses), he isn't only there for our entertainment, but he also teaches
children about the world.
I think most parents worry when their
children venture onto social media, especially with all the cyber bullying and online
predators you read
about.
Moreover, it's
about a state of emergency, specifically the threats posed to indigenous
children, sometimes by
predators in their own communities, though the condescension and indifference of white society remain implacable factors within these crimes.
But I don't quite see how all this rhetoric
about «pervert [ing] justice,» «maximum protection to
children 16 and under,» and «the greatest attainment of protection of society against
child sexual
predators» fits with the case in which the debate is
about one day.