Sentences with phrase «about claim trends»

These companies are also very knowledgeable about claim trends and the issues that are driving litigation within the industry you are in.

Not exact matches

Like several other investors that have sued Facebook, Jones claims that the social network knew about its weak revenue trends before its IPO but failed to disclose this information.

We make no claims or guarantees about future house values or other housing - related trends.

The Home Buying Institute makes no claims about future interest rates or mortgage trends.

We make no claims or assertions about mortgage trends in 2017.

The publishers of this website make no claims or guarantees about future interest rates or trends within the mortgage market.

HBI makes no claims or assertions about future mortgage trends.

As a general rule, the Home Buying Institute (HBI) makes no claims or assertions about future trends within the housing industry.

The publishers of this website make no claims or assertions about future interest rate trends.

The publishers of this website make no claims about future home prices or other housing - related trends.

Red corn, too, is about to claim a corner of the ancient grain trend.

We were pretty skeptical about a wellness trend called earthing (or grounding) when we first heard about it, but it turns out that biophysics can back up the claims.

For example, there is a global trend at the moment towards adding probiotics to formula and for many years here companies have made claims about prebiotics in formula, which scientific authorities say have no benefit in formula.

The couple's appetite for dessert owed its ambivalence to the unusual nature of their dining experience: The Scheibehennes had visited a «dark restaurant,» where sight - impaired waiters serve customers their meals in a total blackout — a trend that claims to enhance the sensory experience of eating, and which has gained popularity in Europe and Asia, with some inroads into the U.S. Scheibehenne, a psychologist at the University of Basel in Switzerland, realized that dark restaurants could provide a great setting for an experiment about how visual cues influence the way people estimate portion size and evaluate hunger.

Kirp ends his critique with a caution about schools» soaring technology spending, as part of a trend that ignores teaching and learning and instead draws reformers to «hyped claims.»

Analytic O'Donnell who has over 14 years of experience tracking the tech segment too is backing the above trend with some hardcore figures, claiming sale of phablets could peak to a healthy 175 million in 2014, outstripping that of small tablets by about 10 million.

We make no claims, guarantees or assertions about future trends within the mortgage industry or the broader economy.

The Home Buying Institute makes no claims about future interest rates or mortgage trends.

As a general rule, the Home Buying Institute (HBI) makes no claims or assertions about future trends within the housing industry.

The publishers of this website make no claims or assertions about future interest rate trends.

We make no claims or assertions about mortgage trends in 2017.

The publishers of this website make no claims or guarantees about future interest rates or trends within the mortgage market.

The trend towards devaluing the significance of early retirement savings is only growing; right now, about half of new graduates claim to shift their attention to student loans instead of retirement.

Lagging indicators claim to help traders make money by spotting trending markets, however, the problem is that they are «late» to the ball, meaning they fire off a buy or sell signal into a trending market after the market has already started to trend, and just as it is probably about ready for a counter-trend retracement.

We make no claims or guarantees about mortgage rate trends in 2014, or housing and economic conditions in general.

[Response: the claim about a trend towards lower predictions is a common skeptic claim, but its not true — William]

There's a long history of concerns about the validity of the MSU2 / AMSU5 data (aka: the MT), going back to Spencer and Christy's work published in 1992 in which they introduced the TLT (or LT) as a correction for the MT.. It was their claim at the time that the MT is contaminated by emissions from the stratosphere, which has a well known cooling trend.

likewise your claim about the recently decelerating altimeter trend — yes if you end your analysis with the stunning recent downward spike due to La Niña.

Neil confronted them with the claim that the Antarctic ice is getting thicker, and asked them to explain how this was compatible with global warming; he also talked about mean temperatures and the trend in the same since 1998 (see the programme from about 7 minutes in, and also from about 9m 15s in).

The main basis for the claim that there has been «unusual» global warming since the late 19th century is that the global temperature estimates constructed from weather station records suggest a warming trend of about 0.8 - 1.0 °C since about 1880.

There is compelling evidence that the atmosphere's rising CO2 content - which alarmists consider to be the chief culprit behind all of their concerns about the future of the biosphere (via the indirect threats they claim it poses as a result of CO2 - induced climate change)- is most likely the primary cause of the observed greening trends.

The authors claim «The sea levels have been oscillating about a nearly perfectly linear trend since the start of the twentieth century with no sign of acceleration.»

And you are still hung up on saying that you can claim there is slight cooling for the past 15 years when that is not statistically significant, try 30 year trends which are statistically significant and in line with the IPCC's about 0.2 C per decade trend.

Marcott paper Basically the folks at RC have probably made poor ol Marcott respond that the uptick did not matter anyway its not important, significant, robust etc don't rely on it just forget about it please etc but unfortunately for them as Ross MC on Realclimate reply, at CA says «But that is precisely what they do in Figure 3 of their paper, and it is the basis of their claim that «Global temperature, therefore, has risen from near the coldest to the warmest levels of the Holocene within the past century, reversing the long - term cooling trend that began ~ 5000 yr B.P.» Without the uptick in their proxy reconstruction this kind of statement could never have been made.

There remain disagreements about quantitation, but there is little evidence to support claims that the effects of CO2 are insubstantial, either in contributing to recent trends or in modifying past trends.

A trend line from 1975 is offered to refute claims about the trend from 1997.

There is nothing more that needs to be said about this graph, except to have a good laugh at those who claim it does not show a significant warming trend.

EMH, since you appear to be one of the subjects of our agnatological inquiry, I'd be interested in your response to the claim about «No significant trend in temperatures since 1995».

He made the point well that much of the argument about climate consists of the scientists having to refute claims made by sceptics based on minutiae without regard for the bigger picture (2008 being colder than 1998 despite the general warming trend, or corrections upwards to the temperature of a single Tasmanian weather station despite the fact overall there was no bias).

However, the relocation of Stevenson Screen recording stations around Perth, coinciding with different temperature plateaux, raises questions about the validity of trends since 1897 and claims of record hot years that precede 1994.

The implication is clear, that if Richard Muller makes a claim about temperature trend you insist he have a scientific basis for it.

Either stick to trend lines with some semblence of an above 50 % confidence interval on a timespan that itself covers at least a 95 % CI (this isn't so hard; it's only 17 years), or compare enough trend lines of the length you choose to establish a 95 % CI for the whole (for 5 years, you'll need about 60 years) and then apply Bayesian analysis to determine how likely it is you've found the pause you claim given the downward trends you see.

I have been pondering this thread with regards to the claims of temperature anomaly trends for the periods 1979 - 2007 and 1998 - 2007 (or there about) and decided to do my own simple minded calculations.

While a recent report tells us current droughts in the western USA hardly make the top ten, we have this from Stanford University, a claim about drought related crop insurance claims that doesn't seem to match data on national yields and trend.

This Catallaxy thread has it all, if you can stomach it — bogus statistical claims from fools too ignorant to estimate a trend line and too lazy to learn how, silly IPCC and BOM conspiracy theories, absurd economic alarmism about the allegedly catastrophic effects of the carbon price, CO2 as plant food, and so on.

If you want to learn rather than pontificate, begin by admitting (without any qualifiers) that your claims about trends in satellite data are just plain wrong.

We often hear the claim that the science of climate change is settled, that there is general agreement that humans have been causing most of the recent warming trend, and that it will all end in global disaster unless we «do something about it».

Yet, while claiming increased certainty about manmade global warming, both reports essentially ignore the absence of any surface warming trend since about 1998.

Yes, that's the series to 2008, but you are making claims about data up to the present and the ENSO component and its trend will depend on the period.

What I find most fantastical about the zeal of the climate modelers is how they will compose such contorted arguments to justify their claim of a scientifically significant warming trend of about 1 degree C over the last century.