Indeed, the discussions
about climate policy among economists have begun to take on a similar surreal quality to those that have characterized policy discussions at the U.N.'s climate confabs.
Not exact matches
With energy part of his remit, it might please
climate change activists to know that
among the achievements he boasts
about on his personal website are «landmark
policy papers» connected to Britain in the low carbon economy.
Among those who care
about cutting the chances that humans will propel sustained and disruptive changes in the
climate and oceans, this reality still tends to result in two mindsets: Raise public will to accelerate deployment of today's relatively costly non-polluting energy choices (both renewable and nuclear) or press for intensified and sustained investments and
policies that can spur energy innovation.
They were also asked
about three specific
climate - change mitigation
policies that have been proposed or implemented in many cities: regulating coastal properties, so their bottom floor is «elevated
among the highest estimated flood level»; limiting outdoor water usage, such as lawn sprinklers; and setting aside at least 25 percent of residential lots for land that allows water to filter into the ground.
There is much angst
among the
climate activists and scientist advocates
about the Trump presidency, his public statements, and his Cabinet appointees — it doesn't look good for their preferred energy
policies and funding for their preferred research topics.
Chief
among those is what
policy makers will actually do with a document that voices concern over
climate change with even stronger language than before, and with greater resolution on predictions
about global sea - level rise.
The site could be improved if it included a reference to the IPCC discussion in Chapters 3 and 4 of Working Group III's recent report which,
among other things, identifies ethical limitations of economic arguments
about climate policies and only a limited number of considerations that should be considered in determining what equity means.
Even
among the researchers who find CE a
policy option worth thinking
about, the great majority analyzes those technologies not as a full - blown solution to
climate change in their own right, but rather a necessary evil to supplement (neglected) mitigation and adaptation efforts.
Tony Abbott is facing growing discontent
among his colleagues
about his $ 3.2 billion Direct Action plan to combat
climate change, a
policy once described by Malcolm Turnbull as rubbish.
With the American Clean Energy & Security Act just passed in the House, let's look at what WWF has to say
about how well the G8 countries, plus five developing nations are doing in terms of
climate change policy: The 2009 G8 Climate Scorecards rank the members of the G8 on a range of issues — emission trends since 1990, growth of renewable energy and renewable energy policy, emissions per capita and per unit of GDP, CO2 per kWh of electricity, industrial energy efficiency, transport policy, among
climate change
policy: The 2009 G8
Climate Scorecards rank the members of the G8 on a range of issues — emission trends since 1990, growth of renewable energy and renewable energy policy, emissions per capita and per unit of GDP, CO2 per kWh of electricity, industrial energy efficiency, transport policy, among
Climate Scorecards rank the members of the G8 on a range of issues — emission trends since 1990, growth of renewable energy and renewable energy
policy, emissions per capita and per unit of GDP, CO2 per kWh of electricity, industrial energy efficiency, transport
policy,
among others.