Sentences with phrase «about climate scientists»

To Jae or whoever said something about climate scientists not asking for money to do this, there are incredible efforts undertaking by administrators from NCAR, NOAA, NASA and DOE to try to get more funding for this, not to mention from our professional societies, and many individual scientists.

That may be true UNLESS he is talking about climate scientists.

Consider that those who are wont to rant seem to rant more often about climate scientists than the IPCC itself.

I hope the «Russian server» will turn out to be some trap set for the hackers; but when I see the brazen disinformation called an FBI white paper, I feel scared.The FBI should consult scientists and historians of science who have researched the history of nuclear winter research; instead, their expert is a KGB defector who makes up a vague conspiracy theory about climate scientists and the history of nuclear winter when many facts are known and published.

He also shows that he considers entertaining about him the hypothesis that he entertains about climate scientists is, in his opinion, ad hominen.

Instead of letting your opinions get politicalized by things you hear about climate scientists just being liars attempting to raise taxes and stuff, listen seriously to the people who are dedicating their lives to tracking climate change.

Which tells a lot about those climate scientists who are dismissing this from the start.

In contrast, science comprehension should polarize opinions about climate scientists along ideological lines.

peoples attempt to make climategate about the temperature series or about all climate scientists is part of the reason why the investigations were botched

Furthermore, you complain about climate scientists not going «back and check the input data» when you yourself failed to do so with regard to the tidal gauges you were touting.

I find, however, that your focus on such trivial inconsequentialities rather than the campaign of abuse and misinformation about climate scientists speaks volumes about your priorities.

So his statement about climate scientists contradicting themselves is completely bogus.

How many times, in how many threads, have you expressed your beliefs about «warmers,» about AGW, about climate scientists, etc.?

May was clearly using the word to mean «the most important» (in relation to the global warming that is taking place at present, the subject of his article)-- something with which just about all climate scientists would agree.

Going back to your always amusing extrapolation from your own views about climate scientists to your ill - founded and unsupported views on public opinions about climate scientists:

Meanwhile, Columbia University's Silencing Science Tracker documents news stories about climate scientists who have been discouraged from conducting, publishing or otherwise communicating scientific research.

In his defense, Ball argued that the article was obviously opinion and was mostly about climate scientists as a whole rather than Weaver, specifically.

According to just about all climate scientists, most of the heat from global warming is going into the oceans.

I have not read Goodwin's piece in detail, but from the excerpts I read here I judge that she assumes the scientific evidence is primarily correct for the scientist / advocate to argue their AGW cases and what she recommends is some generalized strategy to regain or gain «trust» from some «misunderstandings» of the public about climate scientists.

I'll tell you someone else who you can be sure knows what farmers really think about climate scientists: their representatives in Congress.

Because Monsanto knows how farmers really feel about climate scientists, it also recently acquired a firm that specializes in synthesizing government and university climate - science data for the purpose of issuing made - to - order forecasts tailored to users» locations.

In fact, the difference would be that Perry is even more vocally opposed to climate science than Bush was — at least Bush didn't have the gall to make ridiculous statements about climate scientists perpetrating a hoax on the American people.

Rabbeting on about climate scientists should do this and they should not put up with data of dubious quality is completely missing the point that they are not in charge of the data.

«Statistical analysis of our data revealed that this decline is attributable to perceptions of recent weather changes by the minority of Americans who have been skeptical about climate scientists.

Remember, the # 1 objective of most media outlets (ie the ones that are corporate > is to maximize the wealth of the stockholders, not make editorial decision about climate scientists» credibility.

Spencer is a climate scientist and he wrote a paper directly about climate scientist.

Not exact matches

There are climate - change deniers, and there climate change debaters, but there is really only one CEO who has made doing something decisive about what many scientist argue is an existential threat the collective mission of his companies.

It describes how Exxon conducted cutting - edge climate research decades ago and then, without revealing all that it had learned, worked at the forefront of climate denial, manufacturing doubt about the scientific consensus that its own scientists had confirmed.

David had also come across a speech by former BP chief executive, Lord Browne, in which he spoke of the warnings company scientists had sounded about climate change, and how their arguments convinced him that it was wrong to side with climate denial.

I think my question to those of you who couple atheism with evolution and climate change is: how can we as scientists even start trying to inform you about the details of what you are arguing against if you automatically presume everything we say is a blasphemous lie?

Understanding the climate is a fantastically complicated problem, about which I know only as much as the average scientist, which is to say: not....

I think my question to those of you who couple evil atheism with evolution, the big bang, and climate change is: how can we as scientists even start trying to inform you about the details of what you are arguing against if you automatically presume everything we say is a blasphemous lie?

There are many honest, hardworking climate scientists who are trying to understand the effects of CO2 on climate, but their work has fallen under suspicion because of the hockey - stick scandal and many other exaggerations about the dangers of increasing CO2.

Francis's encyclical joins a number of documents, including the 2006 Evangelical Climate Initiative, a 2011 National Association of Evangelicals report, and a 2013 letter from 200 evangelical scientists to Congress, that «all state in clear and unmistakable terms that caring about climate change is caring for «the least of these,»» wrote evangelical climate scientist Katharine Climate Initiative, a 2011 National Association of Evangelicals report, and a 2013 letter from 200 evangelical scientists to Congress, that «all state in clear and unmistakable terms that caring about climate change is caring for «the least of these,»» wrote evangelical climate scientist Katharine climate change is caring for «the least of these,»» wrote evangelical climate scientist Katharine climate scientist Katharine Hayhoe.

Frankly, if I wanted to worry about climate change, I would worry about global cooling again, since the sun is behaving very weakly just now, and sun - watching scientists have even dared to suggest that a reprise of the Little Ice Age is in the offing.

Scientists deliver the results about climate change.

For some time now many scientists, even and perhaps especially those connected to the climate alarmism movement, have worried about the exaggerations and downright apocalyptic scenarios which have come out of the writings of some of their scientific colleagues like James Hansen or James Lovelock,....

They claim that thousands of respectable scientists aren't sure about climate change.

As he explained to the Financial Times: «[Granata and I] were both very concerned by climate change and we wanted to do something about it, so we started meeting scientists at the Polytechnic University of Milan and started research to develop that technology.»

The deafening silence around climate change in the US presidential campaign has left leading climate scientists baffled by the absence of debate about the «greatest issue of our time».

The co-chair of the working group responsible for the report, climate scientist Chris Field, spoke repeatedly and eloquently about the need, in the face of uncertainty, to weigh up the risks of possible outcomes.

This is about Brown's ego and a whimsical an irrational urge on the part of scientists, who have painted themselves into a corner prematurely, for climate stasis.

Others have become more sceptical after reading the work of scientists who refuse to accept the broad consensus in their community about climate change.

An Ipsos Mori poll found many do not think climate change is as big a threat as scientists and politicians warn and are more concerned about terrorism, crime, graffiti and even dog mess.

AAAS leads intersociety letter expressing «grave concern» about congressional inquiry that unfoundedly called into question federal climate scientists» integrity [November 24, 2015]

Leading U.S. scientists have complained about threatening communications and abusive e-mails as a result of their research on the climate impact of heat - trapping gases from human activity.

The surprise findings tell scientists something about past extinctions and Earth's future prospects as climate change, habitat destruction and pollution set us up for Earth's sixth mass extinction.

Rustad, a scientist with USDA Forest Service, is concerned about evidence suggesting climate change will bring severe ice storms more often.

At the end of 2016, Selin and several colleagues wrote about the need for «policy literacy» education for climate scientists in WIREs Climate climate scientists in WIREs Climate Climate Change.

Astrid Caldas told the audience about her transition from ecologist and professor to climate scientist.