Continuing a recurrent theme in these posts, I'll describe yet another idealized framework for
thinking about the climatology of tropical cyclone (TC) formation.
His opinions are not scientific, they are mostly narrowly scoped, poorly researched perspectives from a weatherman that apparently knows
little about climatology.
Readers might wish to click the link to discover that this David Evans clearly knows (essentially)
nothing about climatology.
Then ask yourself, do you want to believe a meteorologist that apparently knows very
little about climatology and all those that «believe» with him based on limited knowledge understanding and their apparent choice to ignore the relevant science?